|
Chloe Xu Management Consultant, Australia
|
Abuse of Delegation | Misuse of Delegating
Delegation is a core part of leadership and management, according to what we have learnt from numerous management works. It is often described positively as an effectiveness method or management technique that helps both superiors (managers) and subordinates (employees), with managers being able to focus on important areas while employees having an opportunity to build their abilities and skills.
However, recent research looks at the circumstances under which managers choose to delegate and reveals that when entrusting tasks to others, managers’ real intentions are often not that positive. The study discovered that managers interviewed tended to delegate decisions when the consequences would affect other people, in particular when all the options were not appealing.
The researchers believe this pattern was driven by 2 factors:
1. A desire to avoid criticism or blame and
2. A desire not to feel responsible if something bad happened to other people.
In other words, the willingness (or reluctance) to delegate had little to do with how important, difficult, and/or complex the decision is.
Moreover, the researchers found that people didn’t delegate to just anyone. Their choice of delegatee is based on someone’s level of authority rather than his or her expertise, which means someone who would clearly be responsible for whatever happened.
Understanding these dynamics can obviously be helpful for delegatees (to avoid being assigned an unfair assignment), and for emerging managers when their decisions will affect others, and for companies looking to help their managers delegate appropriately.
Source: Steffel, M., Williams, E. and Perrmann-Graham, J. (2016). Passing the Buck: Delegating Choices to Others to Avoid Responsibility and Blame. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, Volume 135, July 2016, pp.32-44. Available at Science Direct.
X
Join 12manage
It's free
Welcome to the forums of 12manage. In this discussion we exchange ideas about Abuse of Delegation | Misuse of Delegating.
Sign up and discover more than 900 centers about management and business administration.
Log in
X
Join 12manage
It's free
Welcome to the forums of 12manage. In this discussion we exchange ideas about Abuse of Delegation | Misuse of Delegating.
Sign up and discover more than 900 centers about management and business administration.
Log in
| |
|
|
| |
|
Paramathmuni srinivas Kumar India
|
|
Wrong Use of Delegation Caused by Lack of Equanimity Avoiding responsibility and blame while delegating may be a result of not attaining a state of equanimity (Editor: ~ a state of psychological stability and composure) while making decisions. A state of equanimity is an essential characteristic to attain in order to be in authoritative position and yet remain happy.
|
| |
|
Steven Cooke, Philippines
|
|
Proper and Wrong Reasons for Delegation A) I'm not sure that those who need to correct these practices engage in these forums 😃.
B) Note that this discussion is not about (good) delegation itself, but about the reasons people have for delegation, why some people hand off tasks.
C) Even properly delegated tasks should be reviewed by the delegate. The best book/advise for doing that at any level of the organization was about getting/keeping "the Monkey" off your back. I forgot the actual title, but another discussion of the principle is here. This is neither a recent nor a resolved issue in business….
|
| |
|
Ioannis Stathakopoulos Manager, Greece
|
|
Delegation is Powerful for Managers But Must Be Just Delegation is a very powerful tool for any manager. You delegate tasks because you trust the other person that he/she will deliver. You control and you coach and you expect a decent and courageous effort.
But you always make sure that the delegee gets all the credit for his/her work and you take the blame for any poor results. If you are not ready for doing this, then sooner or later people will start dreading every time you ask them to do something. And you will lose their trust in you and thus their best intentions.
|
| |
|
David Harland Consultant, United Kingdom
|
|
Nefarious Use of Delegation Delegation is a powerful tool, I've used it myself to with positive effect. However, it can be used nefariously (Editor: ~in a shameful, evil way). In the last few months, I've witnessed an individual be dismissed. The lowest person in the hierarchy delegated activities way outside their scope of competence because the delegators were clueless and needed a sacrificial lamb.
Where there's one, there are usually others. This was not the first case of abusive practices at this particular firm.
Recent independent article on staff appraisals: “Employees that do best in performance management systems tend to be the employees that are the most narcissistic and self-promoting,” said an HR practice leader. “Those aren’t necessarily the employees you need to be the best organization going forward.”
It seems to be recognized that HR practices are inadequate to ensure psychologically suspect individuals are not getting promoted into a position where they can do significant harm.
|
| |
|
Collins, New Zealand
|
|
Role of Popular Leadership Models in Delegation Current models of leadership tend to ensure that narcissists are promoted over others. Ideas such as 'heroic leadership' and the 'transformational leader' are based on character traits such as extroversion, charisma and fearlessness. More thoughtful styles of leadership are simply not appreciated in many organizations.
|
| |
|
Gregory Johnson Coach, United States
|
|
Evil Delegation Should be Punished @Collins: Systems of accountability are more evident based and not based on the subjective properties mentioned in your response.
In building effective teams, delegation is required when executing, in a positive way, toward some clearly defined outcome. With this, there are or should be measurable outcomes and timelines.
Anyone intentionally employing strategies and tactics consistent with the study discussed here by Steffel, Williams, and Perrmann-Graham should be terminated IMMEDIATELY. This is behavior-based and should be crushed at its core, no matter what level one sits in the organization.
|
| |
|
Andrew Blaine Business Consultant, South Africa
|
|
Delegation and 'Passing the Buck' What is described in the introduction is not really delegation, but more "passing the buck" (moving responsibility downwards to protect oneself from impending failure).
I think it was Napoleon who co (...)
|
| |
|
Paramathmuni srinivas Kumar India
|
|
Factors to Avoid Wrong Use of Delegation In my view, in order to have a good delegation by empowerment, following factors can be kept in mind by the manager (delegator) to achieve the proper mental state and cohesive bonding I described @abo (...)
|
| |
|
Norman Dragt Netherlands
|
|
Why Women are Held Back @Collins: This kind of popular leadership ideas / styles are also a reason why women have less chance of rising through the ranks. As most women are thoughtful, risk averse, cooperative and self doubt (...)
|
| |
|
judith aldaba Philippines
|
|
When Abuse of Delegation is Wrong Delegation is an important aspect of management because it enables one to share certain responsibilities with other people and at the same time "empower" those members of the organization.
However, c (...)
|
|
Comments by date▼