Management - 12manage

SERVQUAL
(Zeithaml Parasuraman Berry)

Comparing service quality performance with customer service quality needs. Explanation of SERVQUAL Methodology of Zeithaml, Parasuraman, and Berry. ('88)

Contributed by: Paul Fedoroff

SERVQUAL Gaps ModelWhat is SERVQUAL? Description

The SERVQUAL method from Valarie A. Zeithaml, A. Parasuraman, and Leonard L. Berry is a technique that can be used for performing a gap analysis of an organization's service quality performance against customer service quality needs.

 

SERVQUAL is an empirically derived method that may be used by a services organization to improve service quality. The method involves the development of an understanding of the perceived service needs of target customers. These measured perceptions of service quality for the organization in question, are then compared against an organization that is "excellent". The resulting gap analysis may then be used as a driver for service quality improvement.

SERVQUAL takes into account the perceptions of customers of the relative importance of service attributes. This allows an organization to prioritize. And to use its resources to improve the most critical service attributes.

The data are collected via surveys of a sample of customers. In these surveys, these customers respond to a series of questions based around a number of key service dimensions.

The methodology was originally based around 5 key dimensions:

  1. Tangibles. Appearance of physical facilities, equipment, personnel, and communication materials.
  2. Reliability. Ability to perform the promised service dependably and accurately.
  3. Responsiveness. Willingness to help customers and provide prompt service.
  4. Assurance. Knowledge and courtesy of employees and their ability to convey trust and confidence.
  5. Empathy. The firm provides care and individualized attention to its customers.

This has been adapted later by some to cover:

  1. Tangibles. Appearance of physical facilities, equipment, personnel, and communication materials.
  2. Reliability. Ability to perform the promised service dependably and accurately.
  3. Responsiveness. Willingness to help customers and provide prompt service.
  4. Competence. Possession of required skill and knowledge to perform service.
  5. Courtesy. Politeness, respect, consideration and friendliness of contact personnel.
  6. Credibility. Trustworthiness, believability, honesty of the service provider.
  7. Feel secure. Freedom from danger, risk, or doubt.
  8. Access. Approachable and easy of contact.
  9. Communication. Listens to its customers and acknowledges their comments. Keeps customers informed. In a language which they can understand.
  10. Understanding the customer. Making the effort to know customers and their needs.

Origin of SERVQUAL. History

The authors conducted a qualitative study, from which they concluded that customers ranked the importance of two SERVQUAL dimensions consistently. Regardless of service industry. Reliability is the most important contributing factor to service quality and tangibles is the least important.

 

Usage of SERVQUAL. Applications

  • SERVQUAL is widely used within service industries to understand the perceptions of target customers regarding their service needs. And to provide a measurement of the service quality of the organization.
  • SERVQUAL may also be applied internally to understand employees' perceptions of service quality. With the objective of achieving service improvement.

Steps in SERVQUAL. Process

The method essentially involves conducting a sample survey of customers so that their perceived service needs are understood. And for measuring their perceptions of service quality for the organization in question.

Customers are asked to answer numerous questions within each dimension that determines:

  • The relative importance of each attribute.
  • A measurement of performance expectations that would relate to an "excellent" company.
  • A measurement of performance for the company in question.

This provides an assessment of the gap between desired and actual performance, together with a ranking of the importance of service criteria. This allows an organization to focus its resources. To maximize service quality whilst costs are controlled.
 

Strengths of SERVQUAL. Benefits

Most users would agree that a comprehensive and thorough examination of service needs and service quality provides an invaluable approach to improving service quality. SERVQUAL provides detailed information about:

  • Customer perceptions of service (a benchmark established by your own customers)
  • Performance levels as perceived by customers
  • Customer comments and suggestions
  • Impressions from employees with respect to customers expectations and satisfaction

Limitations of SERVQUAL. Disadvantages

There have been a number of studies that doubt the validity of the 5 dimensions. And of the uniform applicability of the method for all service sectors. According to an analysis by Thomas P. Van Dyke, Victor R. Prybutok, and Leon A. Kappelman, it appears that the use of difference scores in calculating SERVQUAL contributes to problems with the reliability, discriminant validity, convergent validity, and predictive validity of the measurement. These findings suggest that caution should be exercised in the use of SERVQUAL scores and that further work is needed in the development of measures for assessing the quality of information services.

 

Assumptions of SERVQUAL. Conditions

  • The results of market surveys are accurate. The validity of the model is based around the results of empirical studies. A number of academics have since performed further empirical studies that appear to contradict some of the original findings.
  • Customer needs can be documented and captured, and they remain stable during the whole process.

Book: Zeithaml Parasuraman Berry - Delivering Quality Service: Balancing Customer Perceptions and Expectations. -

Journal: Parasuraman, Berry, and Zeithaml (1988) - SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring customer perceptions of service quality - Journal of retailing 64 (1) Spring. 12-40 -

Journal: Parasuraman, Berry, and Zeithaml (1991) - Refinement and reassessment of the SERVQUAL scale - Journal of retailing 67 (4) Winter. 420-450 -

Journal: Parasuraman, Zeithaml, and Berry (1985) - A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research - Journal of marketing 49 (4) Fall. 41-50 -

Journal: Parasuraman, Zeithaml, and Berry (1994) - Alternative scales for measuring service quality: A comparative assessment based on psychometric and diagnostic criteria - Journal of marketing 70 (3) Fall. 201-230 -

 

SERVQUAL Forum

Recent User Comments
Tess - USA Calculating SERVQUAL "I am working on my thesis and I am using the SERVQUAL method to calculate the variations in expectations among hotel personnel. Where can I find more information on how to calculate the results from the surveys?"    7
A. Bhattacharya - India Marketing Models "I believe the dimensions relating to service quality are culture specific. Therefore, the dimensions considered for the Western society may not be relevant for India which is remarkably different from West in respect of culture. In fact, same set of dimensions may not hold good even for all regions in India, the reason being that India is highly heterogeneous in respect of its culture."    -2
M.Yaseen Khan - India Validity in Retail "How SERVQUAL could be authentic in Retail specially in indian market?"    -4
Younes Mazlumi - Iran Product Quality "There is no pure service. The Gaps model is better to include product quality as well."    10
Paul MBA - UK Gap 5 in servqual model "It is relevant to note that the difference between the expected service by the customer and the perceived service by the customer (= gap 5) in the SERVQUAL model equals the sum of the gaps 1 + 2 + 3 + 4. As a result, gap 5 can only be influenced indirectly by management; by changing the gaps 1 to 4."    -1
Best User Comments
Theresa - S-Africa Change in perceptions "Service quality perceptions and expectations may change over time. How can Servqual deal with the dynamics of changing customer expectations?"    15
Dave - UK Acronym "The original attributes (key dimensions) are sometimes rearranged to form the acronym: RATER."    -10

SERVQUAL Special Interest Group



SERVQUAL Education & Events



Add a link to this page

Copy and paste this code to your web page:

 

More information?

12manage Premium may contain the following additional information about (the) SERVQUAL :

        - Expert Tips and Management Papers - More info

        - News and Videos on this method - More info

 

Compare with SERVQUAL: Relationship Marketing  |  Customer Relationship Management  |  Operational CRM  |  Extended Marketing Mix (7-Ps)  |  Customer Satisfaction Model  |  Two Factor Theory  |  Total Quality Management  |  Quality Function Deployment  |  3rd Party Logistics (3PL)  |  Service Profit Chain

 

Return to Management Hub: Knowledge & Intangibles  |  Marketing  |  Supply Chain & Quality

 

More Management Methods, Models and Theory

12manage for:










 

 

Copyright 2008 12manage - E-learning community on management. V10.0 - Last updated: 2008-03-25. All names tm by their owners.

Enter a new Tip, Idea, Comment or Question

Name:*   
Country:*  
Subject:*  
Comment:*  
   9147

Enter the above 4 digits:*

 

 

 

Please comment only on (the) .

Respect other People's Opinions. Spam Comments will be removed automatically.


Enter your Reaction.

Name:*  
Country:*  
Subject:*  
Reaction:*  
   9963

Enter the above 4 digits:*

 

 

 

Respect other People's Opinions. Spam Comments will be removed automatically.



Enter your Reaction.

Name:*  
Country:*  
Subject:*  
Reaction:*  
   8424

Enter the above 4 digits:*

 

 

 

Respect other People's Opinions. Spam Comments will be removed automatically.



Enter your Reaction.

Name:*  
Country:*  
Subject:*  
Reaction:*  
   8620

Enter the above 4 digits:*

 

 

 

Respect other People's Opinions. Spam Comments will be removed automatically.



Enter your Reaction.

Name:*  
Country:*  
Subject:*  
Reaction:*  
   0797

Enter the above 4 digits:*

 

 

 

Respect other People's Opinions. Spam Comments will be removed automatically.


  § Kambagha Abdul (Tanzania) Gap 5 in servqual model ""I agree with the comments from Paul, because if the management of a service organization treats their employees well in terms of pay, job satisfaction, recognizing their role and future advancement and caring, they will definitely serve the company's customers well. The opposite of these will definitely lead to customer dissatisfaction and hence poor performance of the company."
  § John G (USA) Gap scores "Yes, the impact of the first 4 gaps also impact gap 5. The extended SERVQUAL model actually measures the impact of these interactions, however very few use it. Most find it easier to use the Gap 5 model but offers little in the way of actionable information. This is a "bounded rationality" approach to reduce complexity but is ill advised in a complex social context where 1 + 1 does not always = 2 due to synergistic forces which are better assessed using systems-view approaches. One cannot use difference scores of the RATER dimensions for expectations and perceptions batteries unless the extracted factors are the same. It is also better to confirm scales using SEM before using them for decision-making. In addition, SEM analyzes all the endogenous and exogenous variable relationships simultaneously which MVA (a subset of SEM) cannot do. Lastly, many applications of the SERVQUAL model fail to assess rigorous data screening methods for MV applicability which can affect data usefulness. "

Enter your Reaction.

Name:*  
Country:*  
Subject:*  
Reaction:*  
   6100

Enter the above 4 digits:*

 

 

 

Respect other People's Opinions. Spam Comments will be removed automatically.


  § Melvin (South Africa) Change in perceptions "It is absolutely true that perceptions and expectations may change over time - and they should for the better - however the opposite is often true - in dealing with the dynamics look at what the gap analysis is saying - where does the opportunity for improvements reside in a specific gap or gaps - apply the PARETO principle - identify what the 20% is and how it is create 80% of the gap(s) - i'm busy piloting and developing SERVQUAL modified"

Enter your Reaction.

Name:*  
Country:*  
Subject:*  
Reaction:*  
   6661

Enter the above 4 digits:*

 

 

 

Respect other People's Opinions. Spam Comments will be removed automatically.


  § Chris (UK) Acronym "RATER is based on the modified SERVQUAL 1994, Parasuraman et al. Derived from the original 10 overlapping dimensions that were considered essential in the original study in 1985."

Enter your Reaction.

Name:*  
Country:*  
Subject:*  
Reaction:*  
   9370

Enter the above 4 digits:*

 

 

 

Respect other People's Opinions. Spam Comments will be removed automatically.