Leadership.

Methods, Models and Theories

Leadership. Methods, Models and Theories (A-Z)

Leadership

Appreciative Inquiry Cooperrider

Attributes of Management Excellence Peters

Attribution Theory Heider

Bases of Social Power French Raven

Beyond Budgeting Fraser

Centralization and Decentralization

Change Approaches Kotter

Change Behavior Ajzen

Change Equation Beckhard

Change Management Iceberg

Change Phases Kotter

Changing Organization Cultures Trice Beyer

Charismatic Leadership Weber

Coaching

Competing Values Framework Quinn

Contingency Theory Vroom

Core Group Theory Art Kleiner

Crisis Management

Cultural Dimensions Hofstede

Cultural Intelligence Early

Culture Levels Schein

Dimensions of Change Pettigrew Whipp

Dimensions of Relational Work Butler

 

Emotional Intelligence Goleman

EPIC ADVISERS Banhegyi

ERG Theory Alderfer

Expectancy Theory Vroom

Five Disciplines Senge

Force Field Analysis Lewin

Forget Borrow Learn Govindarajan Trimble

Framing Tversky

Functional Leadership

Groupthink Janis

Newsletter?

Enter your email address:

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Growth Phases Greiner

Hagberg Model of Personal Power

Hierarchy of Needs Maslow

Inspirational Leadership

Instrumental Approach of Stakeholder Theory

Intrinsic Stakeholder Commitment

Leadership Continuum Tannebaum

Leadership Pipeline Drotter

Leadership Styles Goleman

Leadership Styles House

Level 5 Leadership Collins

Leveraged Buy-out

Levers of Control Simons

Management Buy-out

Management by Objectives Drucker

Managerial Grid Blake Mouton

Managing for Value McTaggart

 

Mentoring

Moral Purpose Mourkogiannis

Normative Approach of Stakeholder Theory

OODA Loop Boyd

Organizational Configurations Mintzberg

Organization Chart

PAEI management roles

Parenting Advantage Goold Campbell

Parenting Styles Goold Campbell

Participative Leadership

Path-Goal Theory House

Performance Prism

Portfolio Analysis

POSDCORB Gulick

Positive Deviance Pascale Sternin

RACI (RASCI)

 

Result Oriented Management

Results-Based Leadership Ulrich

SECI model Nonaka Takeuchi

Servant-Leadership Greenleaf

Seven Habits Covey

Seven Signs Of Ethical Collapse Jennings

Seven Surprises Porter

Situational Leadership Hersey Blanchard

SMART Drucker

Social Intelligence

Spiral Dynamics Graves

Stakeholder Value Perspective

Strategic Intent Hamel Prahalad

Strategic Stakeholder Management

 

Missing a Method?

 

Ten Schools of Thought Mintzberg

Theory of Constraints Goldratt

Theory of Mechanistic and Organic Systems Burns

Theory of Needs McClelland

Theory of Reasoned Action Ajzen Fishbein

Theory X Theory Y McGregor

Theory Z Ouchi

Turnaround Management

Twelve Principles of the Network Economy Kelly

Two Factor Theory Herzberg

Value Based Management

Value Disciplines Treacy Wiersema

Whole Brain Model Herrmann

 

 

Leadership Community of Interest


Visit the Community of Interest

Leadership Forum

Recent User Comments
 - India Can leadership be Generated or is it born gift "hello everybody, can any one tell me that whether a leadership is A god gift which comes naturally with birth, can it be gathered after some age"    7
 - Bulgaria 3 Levels of Leadership "Always keep in mind that organizational leadership has to be taken as executing capabilities at three levels:
- individual capabilities;
- group capabilities;
- organizational capabilities.
These capabilities are different and only the synergy between them is giving the excellence of true leadership."
   3
BENBOUAZZA - Morocco Triadic Leadership "Effective leaders harness three forces: knowledge, trust and power.
The first force in the triad of leadership is knowledge. Effective leaders know or can find out what should be done. In other words,they have vision, and they know wow to fulfill that vision.
The second force in the triad is trust. People trust effective triadic leaders, giving them loyalty and commitment. Triadic leaders earn trust by disclosing relevant information, sharing influence, and competently using knowledge. They earn trust by fairness in their dealings with others-fulfilling the spirit of their agreements, sharing rewards and hard times and not abusing their power.
The third force is power. Effective triadic leaders use their power appropriately. They know when and how to delegate. They know how to review and evaluate constructively. They know how to be consultants, providing guidance rather than issuing commands."
   3
Heena khalid - India Basic Leadership Attributes "I'd like to give some basic attributes on leadership that run on all fields of corporates. In my view, attributes of high quality leadership are:
A. Forming and inspiring a shared vision inspiring people to achieve more
B. Open to learning with mental resilience
C. Mental and emotional strengths energizing the people
D. Guiding as a vital skill."
   6
 - Netherlands New Management Position? Avoid Quick Win Traps "Of course, realizing quick wins is important when you're in a new management job. By doing so you reassure your boss that he made the right promotion / hiring decision, you convince your employees that they can have confidence in you, and you show to your colleagues that an equal has joined their ranks.
But Mark van Buren and Todd Safferstone have found through a large-scale survey that there are 5 frequent traps on the way to a quick win, leading to what they call a "quick-win paradox":
1. Focus too heavily on the details
2. React negatively to criticism
3. Intimidate others
4. Jump to hasty conclusions
5. Micromanage direct reports
In general van Buren and Safferstone recommend to shift your focus from creating individual quick wins to creating collective quick wins. This advise makes sense being a manager. After all your primary job is to make your people successful. Source: The Quick Wins Paradox, HBR Jan 2009, p. 54-61."
   7
Best User Comments
Donald - USA The Incomplete Leader "I noticed a new perspective on leadership methods in HBR Feb 07 by Deborah Ancona c.s. She argues no human being is perfect and no leader can be perfect. So maybe its for the best to stop trying to be a perfect leader. Leaders should find others who can offset their limitations and complement their strenghts. A framework of distributed leadership is provided. This leadership model mentions 4 important capabilities: sensemaking, relating, visioning and inventing. Do you agree we should stop expecting so much of leaders in organizations?"    64
Dr. Hemjith - India Leadership and Ownership "Our research (my co-researcher R. Chandrashekar and myself) shows that " Leadership without Ownership" does not exist. We used to debate as to whether "Leadership is a myth or not". Myth generates false hopes and hope is HOPE, whether false or genuine. We arrived at the notion of "Ownership". When we extend our sense of ownership to our organisation, our reflexes include the organisation's well being - a sense of total belonging. People working with me, their well being becomes my well being. The moment the sense of ownership is infused in a relationship, the reflexes take over. You cease to think and debate. You start to feel and react. Thinking cannot produce spontaneous reaction. There is always latency in thinking. But feeling is spontaneous. It delivers the reaction 100% without transmission loss. But it should orginate from a center of purity without selfish motives and there lies the essence of leadership."    49
Radhakrishnan - India Leadership is context specific "Leadership is context specific. There is no such thing as 'global leadership'. Experience of leaders in different fields has proven this. It is about clarity of purpose in a given context (business, organization building) and achieving the goal, fully involving the team in the process. Study of different leaders & leadership styles will help in gaining insight as to how goals have been achieved and what style has helped, but individuals can innovate styles and still succeed."    42
 - South Africa Management and Leadership "Warren Bennis, the leadership guru has differentiated leadership from management with two simple acronyms. The management acronym POEM means: ‘Plan, Organise, Execute and Monitor and Measure’. This is quite different form the leadership acronym MAST, which signifies that a leader manages ‘Meaning, Attention, Self and Trust’.
Management of Meaning (what does this mean for my company?), and the Management of Attention (if this is important, then we’d better focus on the following activities, and importantly STOP these activities).
The Management of Self is fairly obvious although I’ve seen many leaders transgress this simple principle by contravening their own espoused principles.
Finally the Management of Trust is another key leadership element: True leadership will require a special brand of honesty if trust is to be built – this honesty tempers hype with business sense, and filters everything through the organisation’s strategic intent."
   30
Elaine - US Leadership barries for women "According to a study by catalyst.org, gender stereotyping is one of the key barriers to women’s advancement in corporate leadership. It leaves women with limited, conflicting, and often unfavorable options no matter how they choose to lead. The 2006 Catalyst Census shows that, even though women make up over 50% of the management, professional, and related occupations, only 15.6% of Fortune 500 corporate officers and 14.6% of Fortune 500 board directors are women. They are either considered too soft or too tough, they face higher standards than men leaders and are rewarded with less, and when women exhibit traditionally valued leadership behaviors such as assertiveness, they tend to be seen as competent but not personable or well-liked. Yet those who do adopt a more stereotypically feminine style are liked but not seen as having valued leadership skills."    22
Kamekish - India Unlearning and Leadership "Unlearning is more important than learning for modern leaders. Leaders can have no appreciation of understanding the situations of the 21st century without full control on unlearning. Unlearning has to be made integral part of decision making for successful leaders. Most people have grown in the last few decades through suitable education, good opportunities, hard work and acquiring wisdom. The decisions have to be made from mind and logic rather than heart. And that is the core of the information age. In spite of learning, changing places, new professions, astronomical growth, etc individuals will be able to manage their present, and plan their future, through systematic unlearning only."    13
Antonio - Italia (How) can one recognize a bad CEO upfront? "Is it possible to see upfront if a CEO is likely to perform bad after (s)he is appointed?"    -1

Leadership Education & Events


Copyright 2009 12manage - The Executive Fast Track. V10.3 - Last updated: 7/4/2009. All names tm by their owners.

Enter a new Tip, Idea, Comment or Question 


Name:*    
Country:*  
Subject:*  
Comment:*  
   3315

Enter the above 4 digits:*

 

 

 

Please comment only on (the) .

Respect other People's Opinions. Spam Comments will be removed automatically.

  ● Patrick Patrong (USA) Are Leaders Born or Made? "To say that Leaders are born, would also say that criminals are also born. Leadership like most attributes are learned behavior. True, some have these learning experiences earlier in life and as a result have more practice. Yet, other have been practicing leadership skills, without a formal definition of leadership."
  ●  (India) Are Leaders born or made? "Leaders can certainly be made and one should possess these following faces to become a leader: Charisma, Consideration Intellectual Stimulation Courage Dependability Flexibility Integrity Judgement Respect for others "
  ●  (USA) Leaders: born or made? "A leader is born out of the circumstances surrounding the problem. You can train and groom anyone for anything. If they're unwilling to stand up and take the consequences of their actions however, they won't lead. Leaders are usually those who have the best skill set fit for the given issue that feel the most confident to lead (relatively speaking about those around them). It doesn't matter how they got the confidence to do so, it only matters that they can demonstrate to others that they do."
  ●  (UAE) Can leadership be generated or is it born gift? "I strongly believe that leadership is sure a born gift. One may attempt to develop it but a natural leader only is an effective leader. I would hesitate to recommend learning leadership as a course, one may only refine the skills. During our class projects, sometimes the project leaders were picked up at random. In all such teams where the so called team leaders were not the "leaders", it ended up with a poor output. You can not make somebody to lead. To lead requires certain inbuilt characteristics. How come one may learn to sacrifice? How come one may learn to be visionary? It is not possible. Have you ever noticed when children play the game of teacher and students, why only one or two prefer to become the teacher, not all? There lies the answer. To lead is a passion, and it is better if it is by heart and natural."
  ●  (Canada) Anyone can lead if they have passion "Absolutely anyone can learn to lead... if they really want to. I think 2 things can make a leader out of anyone, and you can easily find examples of unlikely heros and leaders all around. First you need to really care about the cause you are leading (everyone is passionate about something - but you need to find it). Second there are some skills you need to learn, and don't ever let anyone tell you you cannot learn them and learn them well. Don't get stuck on one idea of what a great leader is. There are charismatic motivational leaders, commanding directing leaders, empathetic collaberative leaders and analytical leaders who are followed because of their undeniable proof of results. Randomly chosen leaders for school and work projects fail because they lack passion about the project, not because they are missing the leadership gene."
  ●  (England) Leadership: some are more talented than others... "Like physical skills cognitive skills can be developed to make individuals successful in life including leadership. However some individuals are born with more talent than others. As Woody Allen would say "life is a bitch". There there will be variance in leadership ability which is a mixture of talent and developed skills. A good read is Malcolm Gladwell's "The Outliers" and "Blink" in this aspect. Regards"
  ● Sherry Lambrecht (USA) Leaders are made and born "Good leaders normally have to have a leadership quality or instinct. The rest is old fashion hard knocks, learning from your mistakes, and what is done with that information."
  ●  (India) Leadership "Leadership is not a born gift it is more based on the traits, experience,l earning and the perception. Leadership is an art or a skill to get the things done accurately and timely. Leadership is a style of influencing others and convince them to follow you. It is basically more of an individual approach that means how a person perceives the things and use his/her skills."
  ●  (India) Leaders "Leaders are by birth (Political), but good leaders are by good practice (To lead others towards good). Don't get confused."
  ● Gerard Gielkens (Netherlands) True leaders have the best of both worlds "True leadership is a golden combination of natural skills by birth and a life-long training of these competentions. Everyone has his own conpetences by birth which are nursed and developed in the first period of childhood. That explains why people without these natural competences don't develop true leadership even if they follows all courses on leadership, and some peolple are great leaders without any training. Therefore, in my opinion true leadership is a combination of natural competences regarding cognition and intuition combined with a continuous proces of learning bij experience and reflection."

Enter your Reaction 


Name:*  
Country:*  
Subject:*  
Reaction:*  
   2131

Enter the above 4 digits:*

 

 

 

Respect other People's Opinions. Spam Comments will be removed automatically.



Enter your Reaction 


Name:*  
Country:*  
Subject:*  
Reaction:*  
   9056

Enter the above 4 digits:*

 

 

 

Respect other People's Opinions. Spam Comments will be removed automatically.


  ● William (Botswana) Power Aspect of Triadic Leadership "This is an insightful contribution towards leadership matters. On the power aspect may I add by saying leaders should work hard on learning how not to use power and then that's when the people they lead will see them as human beings something which can bring good relations at work!"

Enter your Reaction 


Name:*  
Country:*  
Subject:*  
Reaction:*  
   9252

Enter the above 4 digits:*

 

 

 

Respect other People's Opinions. Spam Comments will be removed automatically.


  ● ganesh tiwari (India) Leaderships for Ethics or Ethics for Leadership "Leaders don't do different things, but they do things differently ! It's here that one must demarcate the thin lining of self-actualization & self-realization for leaders. Whether (s)he is practicing leadership for ethics or ethics for leadership. In the former case it is self-propelled inner motivation which brings Value Based Development, while in the later case it may be forced or compulsion from external forces where there is every likelihood for deviation & thus imbalanced or unethical development. It is up to the leader to decide which way (s)he goes."
  ● William Gomes (Brazil) Creating and mantaining a culture of continuous improviment "Yes! The new age will not bring any possibility of less organizational pressure. To do the right thing, right, at the right time is not sufficient from now on, so the leadership challenger is directing the organization collaborators focused on clients, improving and innovating their activities. We are seeing that every one should get the importance of perfect understanding of business process management to transform the ambient in a process oriented organization."
  ● Hashem Hamad (Egypt) Inherited or Acquired "Ii guess the question "is leadership inherited or acquired" remains unanswered. If leadership is an attitude, then it tends to be inherited rather than acquired."
  ● Prakash rao (India) Learners are leaders "Learners are leaders. Delearning is also a learning process. Leaders must do "5S" of their mind. It should be kept free for receiving inputs from others. They should constantly change the process."
  ●  (Nigeria) Environment of the Leader "It might necessary to note that the extent to which a leader uses his or her attributes will depend on the dynamic and fluidity nature of these attributes with respect to the local environment of the leader. The issue on ground at each organization is important. Most leaders acquire all sorts of skills but could meet up with resistance with implementation in the organization. Adaptation of learned and acquired skills is important. Another major aspect to address in the issue of staff motivation especially in developing world like Nigeria where I work and every staff is concerned about what goes home with him or her. The level of poverty and the high illiteracy level poses big challenges even to the best of leaders. The best category of people to lead, manage or govern are the uneducated sets. Their motivational needs are not expensive and mainly physiological but the issue is whether they are the type of group to achieve the organizational goal."
  ● Nwene Anthony (Nigeria) Motivate your Subordinates "I think to be a good leader, you should also motivate your subordinates adequately for their positive input into the organization. In so doing it's easier for them to key into your vision and help you achieve it and more with little effort."
  ●  (Netherlands) Trait Leadership Theory page "See also our Trait Leadership Theory page for more on traits of leaders."

Enter your Reaction 


Name:*  
Country:*  
Subject:*  
Reaction:*  
   5020

Enter the above 4 digits:*

 

 

 

Respect other People's Opinions. Spam Comments will be removed automatically.


  ●  (India) Quick Win Paradox "True, no companion will give you a walk over or smooth ride, still those who manage earliest break through, get recognition and followers in the organisation. You can be a winner through optimising the use of your team."
  ● Venkatakrishnan (India) Short to Long Term "Yes, individual to collective is true, at the same time the 5 traps are short lived. Think and act for long term be part of the team. Support, monitor and celebrate the team win."
  ● Frances (USA) New Management Position "I lived that New Management position and I found that listening and asking a few questions to understand those who work for you and those you work for is key in the first 6 months of a new mgmt position. People don't always want you to solve their problems, they want you to listen and let them bounce off ideas to see that they are managing situations correctly or fairly. Being positive, non confrontational and seeing the big picture is key."
  ● Charu (India) Individual vs Collective "I am not fully satisfied with this. Acc to me in order to be successful you need to be situational: it is not always true that only teamwork matters, your individual efforts also matter a lot. If you think that only by motivating your subordinates you will make it, this is not always true. To win something in your life you also have to put your best to get something in life."
  ● Ram (India) Leadership Success depends on Team "Leadership success nowadays is a one way ticket, where the leader talks and talks, sets his goal and gets it done by his team. His ability to get accepted as a leader depends on how his team delivers."

Enter your Reaction 


Name:*  
Country:*  
Subject:*  
Reaction:*  
   1433

Enter the above 4 digits:*

 

 

 

Respect other People's Opinions. Spam Comments will be removed automatically.


  ● Gurmeet (India) The incomplete leader "Very sensible observation. The concept of distributed leadership is practicable and also ensures participation and ownership across the team."
  ● Zdzislaw (USA) Incomplete Leader "The idea presented by Donald is such an important idea. I see too many leadership coaches come in and create expectations that no one could ever satisfy. The idea of building a leadership team to complement strengths is important. Not only does it address limitations of each leader but it also enhances the organizations capability to respond to emerging situatons better. Different situations require different leadership styles, by building a team with complementary strengths dramatically increases an organizations ability to deal with different circumstances."
  ● Debbie Payne (Canada) The Incomplete Leader "The question, should we stop expecting so much of leaders in organizations, as related to being the "perfect leader" strikes me as odd in some ways. My sense is we should be expecting more of leaders, not perfection, but more different leadership and leadership that is holistic, with a stronger focus on development of employees as leaders. We need the the right leaders in the right positions at the right time AND we need them to recognize this, and recognize when they need to move to another place/time to contribute in new ways."
  ● Odukoya S.O.A. (Nigeria) Incomplete Leader "I think what we should be talking about is not a perfect leader but perfect leadership, and I will like to inform you that there is perfect leadership BUT that is something only the Holy Spirit can do in a mortal man."

Enter your Reaction 


Name:*  
Country:*  
Subject:*  
Reaction:*  
   1984

Enter the above 4 digits:*

 

 

 

Respect other People's Opinions. Spam Comments will be removed automatically.


  ● Erik Ottosson (Sweden) Leadership and Ownership "Dr Hemjiths reflection on leadership is truly beautiful. I´m greateful for his contribution. As I understand the essence of "Leadership with Ownership", a leader can make use of the individual energy of the followers, who will react spontaneously as soon as they become "owners". This view on leadership clearly brings the issue of individual responsibility to the surface. A leader can have good or bad intentions, but as soon as the threshold of ownership is past, people will follow their leader, the logical reflections will come later, in the light of the factual events and with second thougt. Often too late, Hitler, Mao et.al have proven this."
  ● Paulo Caius (Spain) Leadership deals with people "Leadership is something related to people and how they are organized in order to achieve goals. During past decades, we could see many theories and all of them can fail or win according to our skills commanding people and generate wealth to be distributed according the culture of each organization. BSC is a fundamental tool as well as Business Intelligence. Many case studies in the world can be analysed and all of them depend on the capability of approaching the social science of the organization. So, before incorporating all of these great practices, please try to understand if you will be able to engage humans on that."
  ● Ahmed Altaf (India) Leadership and Ownership "I truly agree with the concept of non-existance of leadership without Ownership only when we talk in terms of Organisation and Business. But leadership as a whole does exist without Ownership. A good example we have is 'Gandhiji' who was not the owner of anything but he took a step further for Freedom and succeeded."
  ● Al Gates (Canada) Leadership "I think Leadership is 'Emotion in Motion'."
  ● Patric Hohl (Germany) Ownership "last sentence of Dr Hemjith reflection is for me the strongest one. Leader will influence world, companies, but if their behaviour, and use of their powerfull skills, are self oriented and not people or company, it will not help the system in a sustainable way. Ownership is adding value to the whole, not the one."

Enter your Reaction 


Name:*  
Country:*  
Subject:*  
Reaction:*  
   4503

Enter the above 4 digits:*

 

 

 

Respect other People's Opinions. Spam Comments will be removed automatically.


  ● Gerald C. (UK) Universal Leadership Concept "I agree. Interestingly, there is a leadership theory that actually says there is no universal best leadership method or style. The best leadership approach depends on various internal and external constraints (factors) or as you call it: the context. See "Contingency Theory" on this page for more info."
  ● Alex Lowy (Canada) Leadership and Decision Making "There is a view that still prevails in many places that effective leaders are especially capable of making tough decisions, even in the face of time pressures, little data and much ambiguity. The best leaders resist doing this however, recognizing that higher levels of complexity and uncertainty often demand patience, dialogue and sustained attention from a host of affected parties. Great leaders recognize the difference between decisions, problems and dilemmas, and treat them differently. They make decisions, solve problems and manage and exploit dilemmas."
  ● K. Venkatesh (India) Leadership means Influence "Leading is influencing without coercion or authority. Leadership demands an ability to sell a vision and create a consensus and realizing the vision. For people to buy the leader's vision, the leader has to exercise influence over the team. Mahatma Gandhi's leadership is an excellent example of influencing masses to buy his vision of satyagraha struggle for Indian independence. It was unusual to follow such a path. Ernst Shakleton showed resilience and poise in face of adversity to show his mean what grit means. Few would have had Shakleton's strength of mind in his failed attempt to reach South Pole when his ship hit a ice formation. He converted every adversity into opportunity and brought all his men back alive despite harsh conditions. Any leader should show what it means to reach the goal and lead by example. Mahatma Gandhi and Ernst Shakleton showed extraordinary skills of leadership to realize their dream."
  ● Leo1 (NZ) Leadership is what you want it to be "Rely more on our feelings and doing the right thing"
  ● Eddie (UK) Leadership is context specific "The old saying that no one size fits all, truly holds in this case - "no one leadership style fits all situation". This is the essence of the contingency theory!"
  ● Souvik (India) Leadership styles "Leading from the front in different situations applying different styles that suits each situation develops a leader."

Enter your Reaction 


Name:*  
Country:*  
Subject:*  
Reaction:*  
   7858

Enter the above 4 digits:*

 

 

 

Respect other People's Opinions. Spam Comments will be removed automatically.


  ● Barbara (USA) Bennis viewpoint on Leadership "More recently Bennis mentions 4 somewhat different factors that are essential for leaders in an environment of complexity and turbo-change, regardless of culture and context:
1. Adaptive capacity (sense of resilience, hardiness and creativity, seizing opportunities, learning)(~Management of Attention?).
2. Capacity to engage followers in a shared meaning (~Management of Meaning).
3. Finding out who they temselves are (emotional intelligence, ~Management of Self).
4. Rely on a moral compasss (a set of principles, a belief system, a set of convictions).
Depending on the context these 4 factors need to be supplemented with other factors. (Business, The Ult. Resource, 2nd edition, p259)"
  ● Barbara (USA) Background Bennis "To appreciate the leadership thinking of Bennis well, you should know that he grew up during WWII, at the time when iconic figures such as Churchill, Roosevelt, Hitler and Mussolini were dominating the world. Furthermore, Bennis was an admirer of Douglas McGregor (Theory X Y). Bennis' thinking implements Theory Y from the perspective of leadership."
  ● Stan Heard (USA) Management and Leadership "It seems that Leadership has been successfully removed from the work of Management in most everyone's mind. Management was once seen as the blending of four functions - Planning, Organizing, Leading and Auditing. Leadership was seen as the work a manager does to inspire others to pursue the goals of the organization. Since Bennis has a new POEM for management, I wonder if anyone has ever successfully Executed in an organizational environment without Leading. Once you remove Leading as work that a Manager does, you can and must create all sorts of plausible reasons for failure. In the end it is all Leadership Failure. Maybe we should re-unite the concepts of Leadership and Management."
  ● David Arnold (USA) Natures of Managers and Leaders "Maybe a more fundamental viewpoint of management versus leadership perspectives lies within their (which I think Bennis is trying to luminate).
Manager - Tactics, shorter scope, objective based, detail driven (reacts to situations, plans based upon more immediate objectives)
Leader - Strategy, broad based, long range, directional (views threats, opportunities, resource needs, needed compentencies, etc.)"
  ●  (South Africa) Nature of Managers and Leaders "The two must go hand in hand for me and I agree with Stan. For me a Leader is some one who has operational involvement in the acronym Planning Organising and Execution Monitoring. I wouldnt really seperate the two. Thanks"
  ●  (Greece) Managers and Leaders "When the two have ever been separated, the two functions are one. You can't have one without the other, like love and marriage. One needs the other to exist.
It is a simple case of good cop (leader) and bad cop (manager). Hey, even Mr. president elect, is using this."

Enter your Reaction 


Name:*  
Country:*  
Subject:*  
Reaction:*  
   6674

Enter the above 4 digits:*

 

 

 

Respect other People's Opinions. Spam Comments will be removed automatically.


  ● Uma Shashikumar (India) Leadership barries for Women "Women in Leadership role is challenging. Especially when she is at the Core level. She has to face the ego problem with the male in the top. When she proposes the valued views or ideas, she is been pushed down, ignored and criticized. Leadership role as women is challenging."
  ● Ellie M. (USA) Labyrinth instead of glass ceiling "In a HBR article (Sept07) Alice Eagly and Linda Caril say there is no glass ceiling (one reason that women cannot reach top functions), but rather a labyrinth of obstacles (at various management levels). They mention the following leadership obstacles for women:
1. Vestiges of prejudice (men still earn more)
2. Resistance to woman's leadership (due to gender stereotyping as described in the comment by Elaine)
3. Issues of leadership style (women struggle to adopt an appropriate leadershipstyle, because of issue #2)
4. Demands of family life
5. Underinvestment in social capital (lack of time to invest in networking: the core work activities plus issue #4 consume all their time)."
  ● Ellie M. (USA) Women reaching the C-Suite "In another HBR article (June 2008, p.36) , Louann Brizendine adds another reason as to why women don't make it to the C-suite: according to her it's a timing issue.
In many companies, the selection for C-suite candidates takes place when managers are in their forties. For men this is a good time, for women not, because at that moment their stress levels are high and their multitasking capabilities are challenged to the maximum. At this age, their preadoloscent and teenage children require a lot of attention at unpredictable times, and also women are beginning to experience normal hormonal changes leading up to menopause.
Brizendine recommends to open the window of promotability wider - especially for women."
  ● April K (USA) An Observation "Ellie, #5 struck a chord for me. I think part of the problem resides with women and scarcity. I do not see women supporting and networking in the same fashion that men do. Social pressures and messaging has developed a false sense of scarcity at the top which puts women in an adversarial position with each other. The results of this are very destructive. I think women hold part of the power to change this equation."

Enter your Reaction 


Name:*  
Country:*  
Subject:*  
Reaction:*  
   6135

Enter the above 4 digits:*

 

 

 

Respect other People's Opinions. Spam Comments will be removed automatically.


  ● Terry (South Africa) Unlearning "Good idea unlearning. Ever heard the saying that "Old ideas only die, when the people who hold them die"? Unlearning should be replaced with shuffling - move leaders to new areas regularly - maybe their old ideas will die when they move, having no currency in the new environment."
  ● Arun (India) Vision and strategy planning "A CEO selection is also based on the past performance, and what he got and can get to the table a major criteria, his/her past baggage of ideas and practices get carried as a baggage from a different service environment. A change of place or task does not necessarily change the outlook, it acts on most counts as a silent backdrop, and gets splurged in discussions, as past historical data as a benchmark. Hence many CEO's with the change in seat of power have been far from succesfull achievers."

Enter your Reaction 


Name:*  
Country:*  
Subject:*  
Reaction:*  
   6331

Enter the above 4 digits:*

 

 

 

Respect other People's Opinions. Spam Comments will be removed automatically.


  ● Pam Brooks (USA) Bad CEO "Yes you can tell if you know what you are looking for. I am a certified behavior analyst and work with a large executive staffing firm here in the US. I have helped them with all of their top placements and they have been amazingly accurate for the past three years. (Thinking, Behaviors, Motivation) the three keys to understand."

Enter your Reaction 


Name:*  
Country:*  
Subject:*  
Reaction:*  
   1009

Enter the above 4 digits:*

 

 

 

Respect other People's Opinions. Spam Comments will be removed automatically.