|
Dialectical Enquiry
|
55 items • 524.955 visits
History of Dialectic Inquiry (Dialectics)Dialectic Inquiry or Dialectics has a long history during which the meaning
and understanding of the terminology changed. In Asia, the idea that everything
is made of opposites, yin and yang, goes back to I Ching around 3,000 years
ago, and the Taoist master Lao Tzu around 2,500 years ago. Taoism holds that
change is the only constant. Taoist philosophy also learns that "gradual change
results in a sudden change of form (hua)". Also around 2,500 years ago, in
ancient Greece, Heraclites had the idea that all change comes through the
struggle of opposites. The Aztecs also held the idea of the earth is made
of opposites. The Lakotas in North America shared this belief. In Plato's
dialogues, Socrates typically "argues" by means of cross-examining of someone
else's assertions. In this way he draws out the inherent contradictions within
the position of his opponent. Aristoteles compared Dialectics with Rhetoric
(the art of convincing others), saying that dialectics are dealing with an
upright looking for the truth. For an unknown reason, the idea of everything
being made of opposites died out in the western world, until Kant and Hegel
revitalized the idea of dialectics at the time the industrial revolution was
beginning. Finally Fichte made the implicit triad existing in Hegel's work
explicit, by clearly distinguishing between Thesis, Antithesis and Synthesis,
and this idea was subsequently extended by Marx and Engels. What is dialectics? DefinitionsDialectics is a process for handling (seemingly) opposing forces (paradoxes). Here are some definitions:
Benefits of the Dialectic Inquiry MethodStrategy, Management and Business Ethics are all complex by nature. Dialectics offer a number of advantages to those that must deal with this inherent complexity, and with these seemingly contradicting forces (tensions). De Wit and Meyer (Strategy: Process, Content, Context) mention the following advantages of taking a dialectical approach to strategic paradoxes and complexity (instead of treating the tensions as puzzles, dilemma's or trade-offs or taking the average):
Some further benefits are:
A method resembling Dialectics is the Devil's Advocate Approach. This method is also useful in exposing underlying assumptions, but has a tendency to emphasize the negative, whereas dialectical inquiry is a more balanced and harmonious approach. Book: Bob de With and Ron Meyer - Strategy: Process, Content, Context Book: Alex Lowy and Phil Hood - The Power of the 2x2 Matrix - Using 2x2 Thinking.. Book: Barry Johnson - Polarity Management: Identifying and Managing Unsolvable Problems Book: Charles M. Hampden-Turner, Fons Trompenaars - Building Cross-Cultural Competence..
Compare with: Delphi Method | Root Cause Analysis | Analogical Strategic Reasoning | Pyramid Principle | Theory of Constraints | Brainstorming | Cause and Effect Diagram | Six Thinking Hats | System Dynamics | Scenario Planning | Game Theory | Spiral Dynamics | Real Options | Kepner-Tregoe Matrix | Plausibility Theory | Chaos Theory | Soft Systems Methodology | Mind Mapping Return to Management Hub: Communication & Skills | Ethics & Responsibility | Strategy & Innovation |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
About 12manage | Advertising | Link to us / Cite us | Privacy | Suggestions | Terms of Service
© 2025 12manage - The Executive Fast Track. V17.2 - Last updated: 21-12-2025. All names ™ of their owners.