|
Carol
Malaysia
|
#4. Unity of Command-principle (Fayol) in Detail
According to Fayol's 4th Principle, Unity of Command, I should receive instruction from one boss who is my immediate manager.
However I have been instructed by other managers from other department too. And even by my colleagues. These instructions make my work overloaded. Is this not a violation of this principle by Fayol?
X
Join 12manage
It's free
Welcome to the forums of 12manage. In this discussion we exchange ideas about #4. Unity of Command-principle (Fayol) in Detail.
Sign up and discover more than 900 centers about management and business administration.
Log in
X
Join 12manage
It's free
Welcome to the forums of 12manage. In this discussion we exchange ideas about #4. Unity of Command-principle (Fayol) in Detail.
Sign up and discover more than 900 centers about management and business administration.
Log in
| |
|
|
| |
|
Franciscus Koning
Interim Manager, Netherlands
|
|
Multiple Instructions of Multiple Instructors
Maybe Fayol, in his time, would have classified it as the violation of several principles of industrial administration!
It is even more important that the content of the commands given to you is consistent and the direction of actions to be executed is one-dimensional. And the probability that this will be not guaranteed in your workstation is high. The effect is improductivity and waste of capacity and materials (failures).
If the work is overloaded with instructions, the instructed person can avoid overload by following the most productive and effective instructions. Those come from the one who can judge the result of your work, your process, and those before and after your process. Prevoyance, organisation, coordination, control!
|
| |
|
Richard Ngcobo, United Kingdom
|
|
Unity of Command is Aimed at Avoiding Confusion
The main aim of this principle is to avoid confusion. If an employee receives conflicting instructions from a variety of managers or supervisors or colleagues, that is most likely to cause confusion and undermine the principle of prioritization from the point of view of the immediate supervisor.
|
| |
|
Adeyinka Oluwaseun, Nigeria
|
|
More than One Supervisor Chokes the Subordinate
Henry Fayol was quite on point regarding the principle of unity of command. I observed that if a staff or subordinate is reporting to more than a supervisor at a time, such subordinate will be choked and may seem incompetent. The performance of such subordinate will be less effective.
|
| |
|
Marie Florence Dieudonne, Haiti
|
|
Managers Must Realize that Employees have an Immediate Manager
I believe the Unity of Command principle is most significant to make leaders realize that they should not command all people who work for them without considering that this person has an immediate manager as well.
|
| |
|
Mukwana Ronald Samuel, Uganda
|
|
Discuss the Unity of Command Principle with your Immediate Boss
It is indeed a violation of this principle.
It could be the other managers are not aware of the principle, or they are simply not appreciating the principle.
My advise to you is to discuss the instructions you've received from other managers (and colleagues) with your immediate boss; from him/her, you're likely to obtain the best advise on the way forward.
|
| |
|
Sachin Narayan Nagle
Manager, India
|
|
Unity of Command if one has a Line Manager and a Functional Manger
Hi, this really creates confusion about what should be your priorities and even more difficult who will award your performance at the end of the year (appraisal).
Sometimes your line manager and functional manager are different, and you have to perform work for the functional manager, but your appraisal is done by your line manager.
My advice is bring clarity who is responsible for your work appraisal and flow of info, and whose directions you have yo follow to deliver output.
|
| |
|
Suleiman C. Muttani
Consultant, Tanzania
|
|
Confusion, Loss of Focus and Loss of Trust
This situation is confusing; it is like in the saying "many whistles can confuse a dog to obey the correct command".
Despite our capability to handle several tasks as a human being, one may lose focus, creating a loss of trust from the immediate supervisor and this undermines the 4th principle of the unity of command.
Increasingly, it renders not only inefficiency of the immediate supervisor, but also creates an atmosphere of conflicting power among supervisors.
|
| |
|
Thusego Kabo
Botswana
|
|
How a Manager and his Manager should Maintain Unity of Command towards the Employee
My view is that if some higher supervisor wants a particular employee to perform a task, (s)he should inform the immediate supervisor, and that the immediate supervisor passes the instruction to the concerned employee to avoid confusion and overload.
|
| |
|
dhanaraj, India
|
|
Don't Worry
Don't become confused after receiving various instructions given by your boss, and various other people. First of all evaluate all these instructions properly, and implement them as per the requirement of the situation.
Even if there is some violation of Fayol's principle, don't bother about it too much. Observe the situation thoroughly and just implement the proper suggestions.
|
| |
|
Bernard Ngwenya
Analyst, Zimbabwe
|
|
Unity of Command in Case of an Acting Supervisor
Thanks for bringing out the above. Yes, it can be confusing. I have been experiencing yet another variant of a situation which is also confusing.
I'm a personal assistant to my boss and he has been clear on how he wants things done. But he is often away and he delegates his second in charge to act on his behalf when he is away. There comes the problem! This person has his own way of doing things, and when my boss comes back, he fumes and says I shouldn't have listened to the acting boss :-) How to deal with such a situation?
|
|
Log in
Comments by date▼