Execution Hurdles in Blue Ocean Strategy

Comments by rating▼

Comments by date

Rating

Anonymous

BOS Execution Hurdles
Indeed the 4 (overlapping) implementation hurdles mentioned by Kim and Mauborgne are:

THE COGNITIVE HURDLE: This involves waking employees up to the need for a strategic shift. Organizations can be almost "wedded" to the status quo. Employees or the culture of the company may believe that red oceans have served the organization well historically, so why rock the boat and try something else as risky as a BOS?
THE MOTIVATIONAL HURDLE: It's hard to motivate key executives and the entire organization to move fast and tenaciously to carry out a break from the current status quo.
THE RESOURCE(S) HURDLE: A major shift in strategy typically requires massive resources for successful execution. Resources are always limited, scarce.
THE POLITICAL HURDLE: Dissenting opinions are often not appreciated in organizations as they threaten vested interests. Messengers of bad news are often identified with the bad news itself. See the whistle blower center for more.

Jaap de Jonge
Editor, Netherlands

Psychological Hurdles to Deciding for a BOS
Adopting a Blue Ocean Strategy (BOS) can be appealing in theory, but in practice, there are several psychological hurdles that leaders and organizations face when deciding to actually embrace and implement this strategy. In addition to the excellent division by Kim and Mauborgne, one can also distinguish these more specific psychological challenges:

1. Fear of the Unknown (Loss Aversion)
Many leaders and organizations are risk-averse, particularly in industries that are already stable or profitable. Or call it lack of courage. The idea of leaving a safe, established market and venturing into unknown or untapped areas can be daunting. Humans have an inherent fear of uncertainty, and Blue Ocean Strategy often involves stepping into unfamiliar territory, where the rules aren't set, and the path to success isn't guaranteed.

2. Attachment to Current Business Model (Status Quo Bias)
Companies may be attached to their current business model and ways of doing things, leading to a strong bias toward the status quo. This psychological barrier prevents them from challenging industry norms and innovating. Employees and leadership may feel comfortable with existing revenue streams and processes. The thought of disrupting what has been successful in the past can trigger resistance, especially if it's tied to organizational culture.

3. Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive dissonance occurs when there is a conflict between what leaders believe (e.g., "we should create new market spaces") and what they have invested in (e.g., "we've built our reputation around traditional markets"). Leaders and employees may feel uneasy about pursuing a Blue Ocean Strategy if it feels like a betrayal of the company's legacy or past successes. This internal conflict can create doubt and hesitation.

4. Short-Term Focus (Fear of Immediate Losses)
Blue Ocean Strategy often involves a significant investment of time, money, and resources upfront. This can be psychologically challenging for companies focused on short-term profits and immediate results. Shareholder pressure, performance reviews, and quarterly targets can create a mindset that favors incremental improvements over the long-term vision required for a successful blue ocean. Leaders may fear that pursuing BOS could result in losses or missed targets in the short term.

5. Overconfidence in Existing Capabilities
Companies may feel overconfident in their existing product offerings or core competencies, and believe they don't need to change or innovate. This overconfidence can prevent them from seeing the need for a blue ocean. Success in an existing market can reinforce the belief that what's working today will work tomorrow, causing companies to underestimate or ignore the threats of disruption and competition from new entrants.

6. Fear of Cannibalization
Companies often worry that by venturing into new markets, they might cannibalize their existing products and hurt their established revenue streams. This fear can discourage them from pursuing a Blue Ocean Strategy. Leaders may feel that if they create a new, innovative product, they will dilute their existing business model or products, which could negatively impact the bottom line in the short term.

7. Inertia from Organizational Culture (Resistance to Change)
Organizational culture can be a powerful force, and many companies have ingrained ways of operating that resist major shifts. Employees, especially in larger organizations, may have deep-rooted routines that make them hesitant to embrace new approaches. Change requires altering mindsets, behaviors, and often organizational structures. For large organizations, this may feel overwhelming, as it requires breaking away from long-established traditions.

8. Overwhelming Complexity
The complexity of implementing a Blue Ocean Strategy can be intimidating, especially for smaller companies or those with limited resources. There's the challenge of aligning the entire organization, creating new value propositions, and executing strategic initiatives. BOS often requires a rethink of the entire value chain, from production to marketing to customer experience, which can feel overwhelming. Many leaders may feel that the effort required is too great relative to the potential reward.

9. Lack of Immediate Payoff (Delayed Gratification)
Blue Ocean Strategy often requires delayed gratification, with results taking time to materialize. Leaders who are used to immediate feedback and rewards may struggle with the uncertainty of whether their efforts will pay off in the long term. For many organizations, the immediacy of results is a key driver, and Blue Ocean Strategy requires the ability to invest heavily in long-term growth and innovation without knowing exactly when—or if—the payoff will come.