Stakeholder Mapping

Knowledge Center

Summary, forum, best practices, expert tips and information sources.

69 items • 1.025.947 visits



What is Stakeholder Mapping? Description

Following or during a Stakeholder Analysis process, it is often useful to categorize the various stakeholders by drawing further pictures of what the stakeholder groups are, which interests they represent, the amount of power they possess, whether they represent inhibiting or supporting factors for the organization to realize its objectives, or methods in which they should be dealt with. Stakeholder Mapping is the process of creating such pictures to clarify the position of the stakeholders of the organization.

Amongst the generic methods that can be used to analyze stakeholders are: Internal / External Stakeholder Analysis, Primary / Secondary Stakeholder AnalysisForce Field Analysis, SWOT Analysis and Actor Influence Diagrams. Actor Influence Diagrams help to picture the formal and, more importantly, informal relationships that exist: the networks. These relationships are captured as a directed graph of arrows linking one stakeholder to another. Formal and informal relationships are captured using different arrow types.

Below you can find some more, specialized stakeholder mapping methods.

Stakeholder Mapping - Power / Dynamism Matrix

One example of such maps is called the Power / Dynamism Matrix. This stakeholder map classifies stakeholders in relation to the power that they hold and the dynamism of their stance. The Power / Dynamism Map can be used to ascertain where political efforts should be focused during the development of new strategies.

  • The stakeholders in group A and B are the easiest to deal with.

  • The stakeholders in group C are important, because they are powerful. However their dynamism is low, so their stance is predictable and their expectations can often be met in a relatively easy manner..

  • Stakeholders in group D should have the most management attention, because they are powerful and their stance is difficult to predict. They can sometimes be dealt with by testing out new strategies with them before final decisions are made.

Stakeholder Mapping - Power / Interest Grid

Another example is the Power / Interest Matrix. This stakeholder map classifies stakeholders in relation to the power that they hold and the extent to which they are likely to show interest in the strategies of the organization. The Power / Interest Map can be used to indicate what type of relationship the organization should have with each of  the groups.

  • The stakeholders in group A require only minimal effort and monitoring.

  • The stakeholders in group B should be kept informed. They can be important to influence the more powerful stakeholders.

  • Stakeholders in group C are powerful, but their level of interest in the strategies of the organization is low. They are generally relatively passively, but may suddenly emerge as a result of certain events, moving to group D on that issue. They should be kept satisfied.

  • The stakeholders in group D are both powerful and highly interested in the strategies of the organization. The acceptability of strategies to these key players should be an important consideration in the evaluation of new strategies.

Stakeholder Mapping - Power, Legitimacy, Urgency

A more recent Stakeholder Mapping model is the Power, Legitimacy and Urgency Model described by Mitchell, Agle and Wood (1997, 1999). This model maps stakeholder behavior into 7 types, depending on the combination of three characteristics:

  • POWER of the stakeholder to influence the organization.

  • LEGITIMACY of the relationship and actions of the stakeholder with the organization in terms of desirability, properness or appropriateness.

  • URGENCY of the requirements being set for the organization by a stakeholder in terms of criticality and time-sensitivity for the stakeholder.

The stakeholders who show only one of the 3 characteristics (number 1, 2 and 3 in the picture) are defined as the Latent Stakeholders. They are sub-classified further as dormant, discretionary or demanding stakeholders.

The stakeholders who show two out of  3 of the characteristics (number 4, 5 and 6 in the picture) are defined as Expectant Stakeholders. They are sub-classified further as dominant, dangerous or dependent stakeholders.

The stakeholders showing all 3 characteristics are called Definitive Stakeholders.

Note that the management of an organization has to assess the position of each stakeholder. It is the subjective perception of management that will ultimately decide the way in which the organization will act towards its stakeholders.


Book: Gardner, J.R., Rachlin, R. and Sweeny, H.W.A. - Handbook of Strategic Planning (1986)

Book: Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B.R., Sonnenfeld, J.A. - Who Matters to CEOs? An Investigation of Stakeholders Attributes and Salience, Corporate Performance and CEO Values (1999)

Special Interest Group

Stakeholder Mapping Special Interest Group.

Special Interest Group
Special Interest Group (211 members)


Forum discussions about Stakeholder Mapping. Below you can ask a question about this topic, share your experiences, report a new development, or explain something.

topic Stakeholder Map for Pharma Company
I am wondering if you have a framework that could describe stakeholder mapping for the pharma company (physicians, patients, payors)? Power is definitely one dimension but not sure what is the other. ...
Comments2 comments
topic Stakeholder Mapping Should Focus More on Relationships between Stakeholders and Their Interplay
In my opinion we should increasingly focus stakeholder mapping on the relationships and dynamics between various stakeholders, rather than the individual significance and influential ability of each s...
Comments4 comments
topic Other Mapping Approaches
I'm a bit surprised the way "mapping" is interpreted... Here it's equated with matrices and what is more commonly called "conceptual mapping" which are useful but really on the the tip of the iceberg....
topic Actor Network Theory by Bruno Latour
Who can provide some more info / reference about this model?...
Comments2 comments
topic Employees as a Stakeholder
When referring to stakeholders, enhancement of shareholder value seemed to take center stage for a longtime. Lately, the realization that stakeholders are more than shareholders is stronger. One key...
topic Political Influence Map
When preparing for corporate change and adoption programs, you can use a political influence map. This significant input into implementation plans, reduces the risk of cultural rejection of the chang...
Comments1 comments
topic Conceptual Stakeholder References
Hello, everyone, I have recently joined this forum, interested in sharing and getting more references on stakeholder mapping and stakeholder analysis. I read the MAW article referenced in this page w...
topic Stakeholder Mapping: Is the "Management" also a Stakeholder?
I have a question to ask: when developing a crisis plan and mapping the stakeholders for this, is the management part of the key stakeholders? If yes, how should the power/ interest matrix be analyze...
topic Stakeholder Mapping in a University
Can anyone share how do you go about using stakeholder mapping to a public sector like universities in a practical way?...
Comments1 comments

Start a new topic

Start a new topic about Stakeholder Mapping

Best Practices

The best, top-rated topics about Stakeholder Mapping. Here you will find the most valuable ideas and practical suggestions.

🥇 How to Create a Stakeholder Map? Steps
What are the main steps in constructing a stakeholder map?...
Comments5 comments

🥈 Stakeholder Mapping for Insurance Company
Does anyone have a model for external stakeholder mapping for an insurance company. Need it for a comprehensive strategy alignment....
🥉 Stakeholder Salience (Mitchell, Agle and Wood)
Mitchell, Agle and Wood expressed the importance of stakeholders’ needs and wishes to the company with the term 'salience'. Stakeholders’ salience is defined as 'the degree to which managers give prio...
Comments13 comments

Expert Tips

Advanced insights about Stakeholder Mapping. Here you will find professional advices by experts.


7 Perspectives of Looking at Stakeholders

Clustering Stakeholders
Ian Mitroff, Emeritus Professor from the University of Southern California, identified seven categories of stakeholder p...

Multiple Perspectives of Analyzing Stakeholders

Clustering Stakeholders
Ian Mitroff, Emeritus Professor from the University of Southern California, identified seven categories of stakeholder p...

How to Reduce Stakeholder Complexity

Stakeholder Analysis Tool
A useful tool to understand what is happening in a complex situation is the Black Box. It is a strategy for investigati...

Categories of Stakeholder Perspectives

Clustering Stakeholders
Ian Mitroff, Emeritus Professor from the University of Southern California, identified seven categories of stakeholder p...

Concerns Against Change and their Remedies

Change Management, Organizational Change
According to Ken Blanchard in the article “Mastering the Art of Change” (Training Journal, January 2010), it is importan...

How to Effectively Conduct a Stakeholders Meeting?

Stakeholder Meetings, Best Practices
Here are a few tips to effectively manage a stakeholders meeting: 1. Try to avoid getting into details and drawn into...

The Role of the CEO in Strategic Change Initiation

Communicating Strategic Change
In management literature the role of the CEO in formulating and implementing strategic change has often been emphasized....

Describing and Analyzing Driving Forces

FFA Implementation
When analyzing potential trends or driving forces, for them to be relevant they must have at least one effect on the ter...
Information Sources

Various sources of information regarding Stakeholder Mapping. Here you will find powerpoints, videos, news, etc. to use in your own lectures and workshops.


Stakeholder Mapping Methods

Seeing Complexity Clearly
Paper by Steve Waddell explains the usage of Web Crawl Mapping, Social Network Mapping, Value Networks Mapping and Strat...

Stakeholder Mapping Diagrams

Stakeholder Analysis
Download and edit these 12manage PowerPoint graphics for limited personal, educational and business use. Republishing i...

Stakeholder versus Shareholder Satisfaction in Corporate Risk Management

Corporate Risk Management
Inherent in corporate governance is the conflict between satisfying stakeholders in general versus satisfying shareholde...

Introduction to Stakeholder Management

Introduction to Stakeholder Management
David Butter explains what stakeholders are and their importance for organizations, distinguishing internal from externa...

Stephen Covey on the Speed of Trust

Corporate Strategy, Global Economy, Banking System, Leadership Development, Stakeholder Management
Steven Covey hints at some of the reasons why trust is so fundamental for corporations, the banking system, financial in...

Research Links

Jump to further research sources regarding Stakeholder Mapping.













Compare with Stakeholder Mapping: Stakeholder Analysis  |  Force Field Analysis  |  Stakeholder Value Perspective  |  Shareholder Value Perspective  |  Ashridge Mission Model  |  Clarkson Principles  |  Intrinsic Stakeholder Commitment  |  Strategic Stakeholder Management  |  PEST Analysis  |  Crisis Management  |  Scenario Planning

Return to Management Hub: Communication & Skills  |  Decision-making & Valuation  |  Ethics & Responsibility  |  Program & Project Management  |  Strategy & Innovation

More Management Methods, Models and Theory

Special Interest Group

Special Interest Group

Do you know a lot about Stakeholder Mapping? Become our SIG Leader and gain worldwide recognition as an expert.

About 12manage | Advertising | Link to us / Cite us | Privacy | Suggestions | Terms of Service
© 2023 12manage - The Executive Fast Track. V16.3 - Last updated: 1-10-2023. All names ™ of their owners.

12manage is looking for BA/MBA students. More info.