Analogical Strategic Reasoning
(Gavetti Rivkin)

Knowledge Center

   

Using analogies to make strategic choices. Explanation of Analogical Strategic Reasoning of Gavetti and Rivkin. ('05)

Contents

Premium

What is Analogical Strategic Reasoning? Description

Analogical strategic reasoning is described by Giovanni Gavetti and Jan W. Rivkin in a fascinating article in HBR, April 2005. Although the authors have certainly not invented analogical reasoning, they deserve credit for explaining how it is used and can best be used within strategic decision-making. According to the authors, managers can benefit if they understand their own reasoning by analogy. Faced with an unfamiliar, novel, problem or opportunity, senior managers often think back to some similar situation they have seen or heard about, draw lessons from it, and then apply, transfer, those lessons to the current situation. Strategic reasoning by analogy can be very powerful if used correctly, but unfortunately also has major pitfalls. Compared to deduction and trial and error, Analogical Strategic Reasoning (according to Gavetti and Rivkin) has the advantage that strategic problems are neither so novel and complex that only trial and error can provide help, nor they are so familiar and modular that they permit deduction. Here's why Analogical Strategic Reasoning is used often by strategy makers:

  • The amount of information available in many strategic situations is similar to the information required to draw analogies.
  • The wealth of managerial experience matches the need for that experience in analogical reasoning.
  • The need for creative strategies can be fulfilled through analogy's ability to spark creativity.

Origin of Analogical Strategic Reasoning. History

Political scientists Ernest May and Richard Neustadt found that analogical reasoning often leads astray policy makers.


Usage of Analogical Strategic Reasoning. Applications

  1. Tool for choosing between possible solutions for strategic problems (but follow the 4 steps below)
  2. Acting as catalyst for generating creative options (out of the box thinking).
  3. Communicating complex messages quickly (people easily understand simple analogies).

Strengths of Analogical Strategic Reasoning. Benefits

  • Compared to deduction and trial and error, Analogical Strategic Reasoning (according to Gavetti and Rivkin) has the advantage that strategic problems are neither so novel and complex that only trial and error can provide help, nor they are so familiar and modular that they permit deduction.
  • The amount of information available in many strategic situations is similar to the information required to draw analogies.
  • The wealth of managerial experience matches the need for that experience in analogical reasoning.
  • The need for creative strategies can be fulfilled through analogy's ability to spark creativity.
     

Limitations of Analogical Strategic Reasoning. Disadvantages

  • Danger exist to draw an analogy on the basis of a too superficial similarity, not deep causal traits.
  • Distinguishing deep similarities from superficial resemblances is difficult. People tend to make little effort to draw such distinctions. This is caused by anchoring (once used, an analogy anchors itself and is hard to dislodge), and caused by confirmation bias (decision makers tend to seek out information confirming their beliefs and to ignore contradicting data).

4 Steps in Analogical Strategic Reasoning. Process

To avoid the limitations or pitfalls of analogical strategic reasoning, Gavetti and Rivkin recommend the following four steps:

  1. Recognize the analogy and identify its purpose. Is analogy being used and how is it being used?
  2. Understand the source. Why did the strategy work in the former setting?
  3. Assess similarity. Is the similarity more than superficial? Where are the differences?
  4. Translate, decide and adapt. Will the properly translated strategy work in the target industry?

Assumptions of Analogical Strategic Reasoning. Conditions

  • Strategic problems are neither so novel and complex that only trial and error can provide help, nor they are so familiar and modular that they permit deduction.
  • Previous experience can be useful in strategy.
  • It is possible to distinguish the good analogies (beforehand) from the superficial ones.
  • The authors only mention deduction and trial and error as alternatives for strategic reasoning by analogy. However many more approaches do exist. Find examples below.

Book: Non yet!


Analogical Strategic Reasoning Special Interest Group


Special Interest Group (260 members)


Analogical Strategic Reasoning Forum  

Recent topics



Best Practices - Analogical Strategic Reasoning

Expert Tips - Analogical Strategic Reasoning
 

How to Avoid Being Misguided by Experience-based Biases

 
 
 

One More Assumption Behind Analogical Strategic Reasoning

 
 
 

How to Design Experiments to Support Decision-making on Strategic Innovations

 
 
 

Learning via the Case Method

 
 
 

Meta-cognition (Meta-thinking) in Strategic Thinking

 
 



Advance yourself in business administration and management



Resources - Analogical Strategic Reasoning

Personal Problem Solving: Process, Principles and Efficiency

 

Analogical Training

 

Analogical Reasoning in Problem Solving

 

Top 5 Strategy Pitfalls

 

Overview of Reasoning Types and Models

 

Analogical R. as Translation

 
 

News about Analogical Reasoning


     
 

News about Strategic Reasoning


     
 

Videos about Analogical Reasoning


     
 

Videos about Strategic Reasoning


     
 

Presentations about Analogical Reasoning


     
 

Presentations about Strategic Reasoning


     
 

Books about Analogical Reasoning


     
 

Books about Strategic Reasoning


     
 

More about Analogical Reasoning


     
 

More about Strategic Reasoning


     



Accelerate your management career



Compare with Gavetti and Rivkin's Analogical Strategic Reasoning: Dialectic Inquiry  |  Root Cause Analysis  |  Cause and Effect Diagram  |  Pyramid Principle  |  Chaos Theory  |  Action Learning  |  Theory of Constraints  |  Brainstorming  |  Six Thinking Hats  |  Mind Mapping  |  System Dynamics  |  Scenario Planning  |  Game Theory  |  Real Options  |  Kepner-Tregoe Matrix  |  Plausibility Theory  |  Groupthink  |  Delphi Method  |  Force Field Analysis  |  Metaplan


Return to Management Hub: Communication & Skills  |  Decision-making & Valuation  |  Strategy


More Management Methods, Models and Theory

Special Interest Group Leader

 


About 12manage | Advertising | Link to us / Cite us | Privacy | Suggestions | Terms of Service
© 2018 12manage - The Executive Fast Track. V15.0 - Last updated: 10-12-2018. All names ™ of their owners.