|
The Experience Curve Effects were first described by BCG consultant Bruce
Henderson in 1960. Henderson found that there is a consistent relationship
between the cost of production and the cumulative production quantity.
Simply put, it states that if a task is performed more often, the cost
of performing the task will decrease. Each time cumulative volume doubles,
the value added costs (including administration, marketing, distribution,
and manufacturing) will fall by a constant and predictable percentage.
Researchers since then have observed experience curve effects for various
industries ranging between 10 to 30 percent.
Cost Leadership Strategy
The Experience Curve is a major enabler for a cost leadership strategy.
If a company can gain a big market share quickly in a new market, it has a
competitive cost advantage because it can produce products cheaper than its
competitors. Provided the cost savings are passed on to the buyers as price
decreases (rather than kept as profit margin increases), this advantage is
sustainable. If a company could accelerate its production experience by increasing
its market share, it could gain a cost advantage in its industry that would
be hard to equal. The result is many companies try to gain a large market
share quickly by investing heavily and aggressively pricing their products
or services in new markets. The investment can be recovered later, once the
company has become a market leader and it has built
Cash Cows.
Limitations of an Experience Curve-based strategy
- There are also other business strategies than Cost Leadership Strategies
(see Competitive Advantage
and Value Disciplines).
- Competitors may also pursue a similar strategy, thus increasing the
necessary investment levels while decreasing the returns for both.
- Competitors that copy manufacturing methods may achieve even lower production
costs by not having to recover R&D investments.
- Technology breakthroughs may enable even bigger Experience Curve Effects.
This is beneficial for companies that enter the market later.
|
|
Reasons for the Experience Curve Effect
Strategy, Cost Reduction, Manufacturing...
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Criticisms on Experience Curve Effects
Strategy, Cost Reduction...
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Experience Curve
Learning by Doing...
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
News about Experience Curve
|
|
|
|
| |
News about Cost Leadership Strategy
|
|
|
|
| |
Videos about Experience Curve
|
|
|
|
| |
Videos about Cost Leadership Strategy
|
|
|
|
| |
Presentations about Experience Curve
|
|
|
|
| |
Presentations about Cost Leadership Strategy
|
|
|
|
| |
Books about Experience Curve
|
|
|
|
| |
Books about Cost Leadership Strategy
|
|
|
|
| |
More about Experience Curve
|
|
|
|
| |
More about Cost Leadership Strategy
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compare with Experience Curve Effects:
BCG Matrix | Return on Investment
| Organizational Learning
| Parenting Advantage
| Core Competence |
Organic Organization
| Rule of Three
| Strategic Types
Return to Management Hub: Change & Organization | Human
Resources | Strategy
| Supply Chain & Quality
More Management Methods, Models and Theory
|
|
|
Special Interest Group Leader
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
