Bridging Epistemologies
(Cook Brown)

Knowledge Center

   

The generative dance towards knowledge creation that bridges the epistemologies of possession and action. Explanation of Bridging Epistemologies of Cook and Brown. ('99)

Contributed by: Tom de Geytere

Contents

Premium

Cook Brown Bridging Epistemologies model

What is the Bridging Epistemologies framework? Description

S.D.N. Cook and J.S. Brown argue that much current work on organizational knowledge, intellectual capital, knowledge-creating organizations, knowledge work and the like is based on a single, traditional understanding of the nature of knowledge. In this "epistemology of possession," knowledge is treated like something which people possess. Yet, this vision can not account for the knowing which is found in individual and group practice.


Knowing as action calls for an "epistemology of practice." Moreover, the epistemology of possession tends to privilege explicit over tacit knowledge. Also it tends to privilege individual knowledge over group knowledge.

Current work on organizations is limited by this privileging, and by the scant attention given to knowing. Organizations are better understood if explicit, tacit, individual and group knowledge are treated as four distinct and coequal forms of knowledge. Each is doing work the others can't. Knowledge and knowing should be seen like mutually enabling; not like competing.


Actions by collectives cannot be reduced to only the actions of individuals within them. Cook and Brown identify 4 types of knowledge: explicit and tacit at the individual and collective levels, and consider how they are bridged by the active process of knowing (OUBS,2001). The process by which different knowledge types are used in practice is described as a "generative dance". According to this metaphor, knowledge creation does not simply rely on an inventory of knowledge elements (possession), but on the ability to use those as tools (action).


Cook and Brown hold that knowledge is a tool of knowing, that knowing is an aspect of our interaction with the social and physical world, and that the interplay of knowledge and knowing can generate new knowledge and new ways of knowing.


Origin of the Bridging Epistemologies model. History

The model from Cook and Brown developed from:

  • Polanyi's distinction between tacit and explicit knowledge (1983). Tacit knowledge is what is not easily visible and expressible. Tacit knowledge is personal, context specific and hard to formalize and communicate. Subjective insights, intuitions and hunches fall in this category, which includes cognitive and technical elements. Explicit knowledge can be expressed in words and numbers and can be easily communicated and shared in the form of hard data, scientific formulae, codified procedures and universal principles. (Nonaka and Takeuchi).
  • Spender's epistemological pluralism (1998): (1) objective knowledge is only one way of knowing things, and (2) some aspects of explicit and tacit knowledge are only known collectively (see also Blackler, 1995).

It adds a dynamic element of knowledge and opposes the traditional knowledge-as-assets or resource view of knowledge. This model resembles the view of Nonaka and Takeuchi in their SECI model, which sees knowledge creation as a transformation of the various knowledge elements.
 

Usage of the Bridging Epistemologies framework. Applications

The framework Cook and Brown helps to think of knowledge in an organizational context and understanding why and how we know things collectively. Their model strengthens the link between product and process innovation. In their view, forms of knowledge distributed among individuals and groups are not the only essential for product development; ways of "knowing" reflected in the interaction of the workers with each other and their objects of work are also essential (OUBS,2001).


An example of the Bridging Epistemologies model

The model is illustrated using the simple example of a bakery: Relevant tools are:

  • Knowledge as concepts. Theory known by individuals, like which flour to use, how much salt to use etc.
  • Skills. The ability to make bread
  • Stories. How things were built up
  • Genre. The context of the bakery

An apprentice can learn or be part of all these elements, he or she will need experience in order to make bread: knowledge as action.


Assumptions of the Bridging Epistemologies model. Conditions

  • Knowledge can not be transformed from its various forms (individual/tacit etc.), but exist in distinct forms.

Article: Cook and Brown - Bridging Epistemologies.


Bridging Epistemologies Special Interest Group


Special Interest Group (13 members)


Bridging Epistemologies Forum  

Recent topics

  Communicating Bridging Epistemologies to Superiors
This information is very insightful and should be used in everyday life. We all should find a way to communicate this to our superiors without being i...
     
 
  Tacit Knowledge and Experience Transfer
A large part of a person´s unique expertise is by nature, tacit. Tacit knowledge is also known as personal knowledge, which gradually has become a par...
     
 

Best Practices - Bridging Epistemologies

Expert Tips - Bridging Epistemologies
 

Barriers that Hinder Effective Knowledge Sharing

 
 
 

Positive Effects of Age Diversity on Company Productivity and (Tacit) Knowledge Sharing

 
 
 

How to Identify and Map Knowledge

 
 
 

Critical Activities to Build a Learning Organization

 
 
 

Capturing Learned Lessons

 
 
 

How Culture Levels Explain Failures in Organizational Learning and Innovation

 
 
 

Knowledge Management Scope

 
 
 

Components of Learning Agility

 
 
 

Knowledge Management Focal Point

 
 



Advance yourself in business administration and management



Resources - Bridging Epistemologies

How to Improve Knowledge Sharing in Knowledge-intensive Organizations

 

Overview of Existing Types of Knowledge

 

Knowledge Management Systems Architecture

 

Introduction to Knowledge Management: Foundation Principles and Building Concepts

 

How to Integrate Internal Organizational Knowledge with External Online Communities

 

Three Levels of Knowledge Management

 

Knowledge Sharing and Organizational Learning through Communities of Practices

 

Knowledge Creation: The SECI Model

 

Knowledge Transfer and Knowledge Sharing

 

Professor Evans Explains Why Fast Change Requires New Ways of Learning and Thinking

 

Knowledge Transfer in the E-world

 

Bridging Epistemologies Diagram

 
 

News about Bridging Epistemologies


     
 

News about Knowledge Organization


     
 

Videos about Bridging Epistemologies


     
 

Videos about Knowledge Organization


     
 

Presentations about Bridging Epistemologies


     
 

Presentations about Knowledge Organization


     
 

Books about Bridging Epistemologies


     
 

Books about Knowledge Organization


     
 

More about Bridging Epistemologies


     
 

More about Knowledge Organization


     



Accelerate your management career



Compare with Bridging Epistemologies: SECI model  |  Organizational Learning  |  Organizational Memory  |  Action Learning  |  Knowledge Management (Collison & Parcell)


Return to Management Hub: Change & Organization  |  Human Resources  |  Knowledge & Intangibles


More Management Methods, Models and Theory

Special Interest Group Leader

 


About 12manage | Advertising | Link to us / Cite us | Privacy | Suggestions | Terms of Service
© 2018 12manage - The Executive Fast Track. V15.0 - Last updated: 13-11-2018. All names ™ of their owners.