|
Please register now to read all responses and to join this discussion yourself. It's easy and 100% free.
|
|
Comparison Competing Values Framework versus Balanced Scorecard?
Jay
|
How does the Competing Values framework compare to the balanced scorecard approach? (...) Read more? Sign up for free
|
|
Please register now to read all responses and to join this discussion yourself. It's easy and 100% free.
Sign up for free Log in
|
| |
|
Competing Values Compared with Balanced Scorecard
R. Meijer
|
|
My first answer could be:
- Rational Goal = financial perspective
- Internal Process = business process perspective
- Human Relations = learning perspective
- Open Systems Model = customer perspective.
This is one way they compare. However, given the focus on facts, goals and measurements it is a rational goal perspective on the four quadrants as identified by Quinn. I think it is best compared on the business effectivenes paradigm; not the leadership or cultural paradigm of Quinn. This is just a first thought on how the models could compare.
|
| |
|
Competing Values Compared with Balanced Scorecard
Roman Walley, Management Consultant, United States, Member
|
|
At a more elementary level, the Balanced Scorecard approach is a way for business to communicate strategic planning by focusing on customers, financial, learning and business processes. The competing values framework is a method for analyzing a businesses culture to see what you have and where you want to go.
If I was a consultant tasked with helping a turnaround, I wouldn't hesitate to start wtih the competing values framework and then use the BSC to help craft and communicate a business strategy for moving forward.
|
|
|
|
|
Special Interest Group Leader
|
|
|
Competing Values Framework
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
