Weaknesses of Porter's Three Basic Types of Competitive Advantage

Competitive Advantage
Knowledge Center

Best Practices

Sign up

Anneke Zwart
Student (University), Netherlands

Weaknesses of Porter's Three Basic Types of Competitive Advantage

Mouillot (2013) argues that although Porter's three basic types of Competitive Advantage are very useful with regard to research for competitive advantage, there are some limitations or disadvantages:
1. Missing Ethical Guidelines for Sustainability: People have become increasingly aware of the importance of sustainable development. In order to stay competitive in the current global environment, it is no longer enough to follow low-cost strategies. Rather, also sustainable issues and its subsequent ethics need to be considered. Therefore, the fact that Porter’s Competitive Advantage Types do not include any type of ethical guideline makes the framework less useful nowadays.
2. Mix of Portfolio and Positioning Strategy: Porter’s “Focus” is a portfolio strategy while the other basic types of Competitive Advantage have more to do with positioning. A company can follow both a cost-domination and differentiation strategy while being concentrated at the same time (Cost Focus or Differentiation Focus). The fact that these different types of Competitive Advantage are developed out of different perspectives can be very confusing, especially when searching for effective ways to achieve competitive advantages.
3. Little Specific Guidance: Mouillot concludes that Porter’s three types of Competitive Advantage remain important for firms in deciding on their competitive advantage. However, the framework does not help organizations to find out in what way or with what specific strategy these competitive advantages can be achieved.
Does anyone know additional limitations or disadvantages? Please react...
Source: Mouillot, P. (2013) “Asymptotic Effect in Cost Domination: The Way to Differentiation” Journal of Strategic Marketing Vol. 21 Iss. 6 pp. 529-540

  Prasad Chundi
Consultant, India

On Weakness #3 of Porter's Three Basic Types of Competitive Advantage

On "Little Specific Guidance" - The methodology fo (...)

  Andre van Niekerk
Director, South Africa

Tactics to Address Weaknesses of Porter's Three Basic Types of Competitive Advantage

I think Porter's models are often used/critiqued o (...)

  Prasad Chundi
Consultant, India

Little Specific Guidance

@Andre van Niekerk: Thank you for your response. I (...)

Start a new forum topic


More on Competitive Advantage
Focus your Efforts in Building CA
CA in Tough Times
🔥Is Superior Value to Customers a CA?
Knowledge Management is more important than CA
Why are Firms Different? Why Successful Firms Differ?
Cost and Value in Analysis of CA: 2 Sides of the Same Coin?
Successful Companies: Only Three Rules Needed?
The Role of AI in CA
Best Practices
Quotes CA
10 Routes to CA
Case studies in "Cost Leadership"
Stuck in the Middle?
How Can Logistics Help to Achieve a CA?
Changing from a Cost Leadership Strategy Into Differentiation
Competition versus Cooperation
CA or Die?
What is CA?
CA in a Monopolistic Market?
Life Cycle Approach to CA
Health/Fitness Club Industry Analysis
What are the Risks of a Differentiation Strategy?
Weaknesses of Porter's Three Basic Types of Competitive Advantage
4 Stages of Hypercompetition
Special Interest Group

Do you have a keen interest in Competitive Advantage? Become our SIG Leader

Competitive Advantage
Knowledge Center

About 12manage | Advertising | Link to us / Cite us | Privacy | Suggestions | Terms of Service
© 2021 12manage - The Executive Fast Track. V15.8 - Last updated: 5-8-2021. All names ™ of their owners.