The Performance-Values Match Matrix (Jack Welch)




Performance Management (Appraisals)
Knowledge Center

Translate

Forum
13
Tendekai Dzinamarira
Manager, Zimbabwe

The Performance-Values Match Matrix (Jack Welch)

Have you ever wondered how employee performance can be aligned to core values?
Jack Welch, former CEO of General Electric (GE) once introduced the Performance-Values Matrix (also referred to as the Jack Welch Matrix) which aligned employee performance with the core values match or culture fit of the organization (company).

Historical Background

In an attempt to enhance the performance levels and the values embracing among employees of General Electric (GE), Welch developed a simple but useful matrix named the Performance-Values Matrix. He used the matrix to classify and differentiate employees using 2 independent variables namely:
  • Performance level. This refers to how employees achieve important results.
  • Values match/Culture fit. This refers to how well employees embody and embrace the guiding principles which dictate the typical behavior(s) needed to be constantly displayed by them.
The matrix enables an effective employee performance appraisal system while also cultivating a corporate culture that encourages and rewards candor and performance. This matrix was one element helping GE to build a high performance culture that made the company such a successful entity within a relative short period.

The 4 sections of the Jack Welch Matrix

Welch was of the opinion that an effective employee performance appraisal system relies not only on proper employee feedback, but also on employee differentiation in terms of employee performance (results) and values match (behavioral/culture fit).
  • LOW PERFORMANCE / LOW VALUES MATCH (Dysfunctional)
    This quadrant consists of employees who have low performance in terms of delivering results and a low values match. Usually employees in this category do not get their job done. Most of them are complainers, incompetent and they hold the company back and impede its progress. Managers should consider moving them out, for they are not aligned to company expectations and they have the potential to negatively affect the morale of others.
  • LOW PERFORMANCE / HIGH VALUES MATCH (Potential Stars)
    This category comprises of employees who are a strong fit with the company values but they are not performing as per their job requirements. These are good employees who should be given a second chance and developed into stars through coaching and mentorship. Managers should consider giving these employees performance improvement plans, performance benchmarks, regular check-ins and ensure accountability.
  • HIGH PERFORMANCE / LOW VALUES MATCH (Terrorists)
    This is the most difficult group for managers. Although these employees depict behavior which is inconsistent with organizational culture and values, they do produce good/excellent results and they usually possess the right skills. They are giving managers a hard time to decide whether to do away with them or not. These employees are "culture killers", usually with a selfish attitude and not being team players. Most managers are hesitant to confront them in fear of losing them and the cost of replacing them. However regardless of them meeting their KPIs, managers should be willing to discourage their behavior and be courageous to mold them back into the organisational culture and otherwise dismiss them.
  • HIGH PERFORMANCE / HIGH VALUES MATCH (Stars)
    These employees embrace organisational culture and produce good/excellent results. These employees are the Stars and form the backbone of the organization and they the critical talent needed for long-term success of the organization. These people should be nurtured, rewarded and developed into future leaders. Managers should leverage on their ability, power of influence and credibility to foster and sustain a superb organisational culture in the long run.

Applicability of the Performance-Values Matrix

The Jack Welch matrix can also be implemented using a finer scale of 1-10 where 1 refers to low performance or a low values match and 10 as the highest performance or culture fit.
it can be employed in conjunction with Welch's 20-70-10 forced ranking system. Welch used the forced ranking system at GE that divided employees into three segments namely; the top 20% of performers, the middle 70% and the bottom 10% . The forced ranking system systematically manages out the bottom 10% of employees each year, advises the 70% to get into the top 20%, and rewards the successful top 20% of employees.

According to Welch, "People need to know where they stand... failing to differentiate among employees and holding them on to bottom-tier performers is actually the cruelest form of management there is."

⇨ Do you have experiences with the Welch model? Please share your comments on employee performance management…

Sources:
Welch J. and Welch S. (2005), "Winning", Harper Collins
Aguinis A. (2009) "Performance Management" 2nd Ed, Upper Saddle River, NJ Pearson, Prentice Hall
Smither J.W. (2009) "Performance Management: Putting Research into Action", Jessey-bass
 

Rating

 
1
Paramathmuni srinivas Kumar
India
 

Can People from All Quadrants Improve?

It is easy to work with people ranked as stars... But if we were to develop and work with the people... Sign up

 
2
Ahmed Aref
Coach, Saudi Arabia
 

Employ a Strengths Based Approach to Make People Grow

@Paramathmuni srinivas Kumar: I share your view that knowing how to become a star is the highest for... Sign up

 
2
Gary Wong
Consultant, Canada
 

Would it be Fair to Label Jack Welch a “Dysfunctional”?

Let's rank this person: He didn't achieve his targets due to a major disaster that disrupted the mar... Sign up

 
3
Gary Wong
Consultant, Canada
 

Dismiss the System, not the Person

A prejorative name for the Performance-Values Match Matrix is the "Rank or Yank" program. Jack Welch... Sign up

 
2
Gary Wong
Consultant, Canada
 

Can People Reliably Rate Other People?

In their book Nine Lies About Work, Marcus Buckingham and Ashley Goodall write about Lie #6: Peop... Sign up

 
1
Cesar Alexis Viteri Perez
Ecuador
 

People are Perfectly Capable of Rate Other People Behaviour, This is the Basis of the Very Idea of ​​law

@Gary Wong: Nobody is talking about the esence/soul of a human being, but about his/her behaviour an... Sign up

 
3
Gary Wong
Consultant, Canada
 

What the Research Says

@Cesar Alexis Viteri Perez: I'm not sure what "law" you are referring to. Could you please clarify. ... Sign up

 
1
Leigh Cowan
CEO, Australia
 

Jack Welch Matrix

Jack's secret was this… He empowered his people with clarity of purpose and values so they COULD fit... Sign up

 
3
Jaap de Jonge
Editor, Netherlands
 

The Unreliability and Necessity of Employee Rating

Thanks for sharing your excellent ideas. The criticism on the "rank and yank" approach is understan... Sign up

 
2
Claudemir Oribe
Consultant, Brazil
 

It's Always Helpful to Correlate Something with Results

Each moment - zeitgeist - has its own characteristics. One day it was IQ, one day it was Competence ... Sign up

 
3
Ashish Dharap
Director, Netherlands
 

Emphasis on Values.... An Example of the Tata Group

The US$ 100+ billion Tata Group has since its inception 100 years ago always emphasized Values & Cul... Sign up

 
2
Norman Dragt
Netherlands
 

Did Jack Welch Distrust His Managers?

What I see in this simple model by Jack Welch of the complex human world of social interaction is di... Sign up

   

More on Performance Management (Appraisals):
Summary
DIscussion Topics
Checklist of 50+ Common Errors in Performance Appraisals
How to Give Constructive Feedback? Models and Tips
How to Achieve Fair Performance Appraisals?
Avoid Routine Annual Performance Appraisals
Concerns not Previously Discussed During Performance Reviews
How to Deal with Average Performers?
How to Get Employees to Improve? Issues with Feedback
Open Communication? Try Coffee Talks
Wrong Use of Employee Appraisals
Three Types of Performance Appraisals
Obsession with Quantifying Human Performance
Broken Confidentiality of Performance Appraisals
Don't Forget Practical Appraisal Follow-up
How to Deal with Poor Performers and Non Performers?
Conditions for Successful Performance Appraisals
Outcomes of Performance Appraisals
How to Receive Personal Feedback? Tips
🔥What to do if NO Annual Appraisal Interview is Scheduled?
How to React When You are Undervalued?
👀The Performance-Values Match Matrix (Jack Welch)
Appraise the Past, Develop for the Future
How to Prepare for a Performance Appraisal as Appraiser
Tips for Ensuring Performance Appraisals Hold Up in Court
Appraisal for Future Job?
Avoiding Biases in Performance Appraisals
How to Identify and Manage Workplace Favoritism
Consider the Job Situation in Appraisals
Post COVID-19 Performance Evaluations
Decentralized Performance Appraisals
Cascading the Business Objectives to Performance Appraisals
Disparaging Appraisal Terms
Performance Appraisals versus Student Examinations. A Comparison
Bonuses.. what is Fair to All Within Large Corporations
Feedback Should be Like a Mirror: Neutral
How Role Clarity and Employee Performance Management can help with Strategic Focus
Mismatch in Performance Appraisals: Actions from Last Year are Rewarded/Punished This Year
Optimize on the Strengths of your Employees
Use of Of Employee Appraisals to Validate the Remuneration System
Special Interest Group

Do you know a lot about Performance Management (Appraisals)? Become our SIG Leader

Performance Management (Appraisals)
Knowledge Center



About 12manage | Advertising | Link to us / Cite us | Privacy | Suggestions | Terms of Service
© 2023 12manage - The Executive Fast Track. V16.0 - Last updated: 29-1-2023. All names ™ of their owners.