Employee Engagement versus Employee Satisfaction


 
Organizational Commitment > Forum

Employee Engagement versus Employee Satisfaction
Jim Kyte, Manager, Canada, Member
In recent years there was been a strong movement towards measuring Employee Engagement, yet someone who is engaged at work can be a poor performer and conversely, someone who is disengaged can be a good performer.
When someone is disengaged, all it really means is they have a life outside of their jobs. I'd rather have someone who is a strong performer with good work/life balance than a poor performer married to their jobs.
Wouldn't it be better to measure EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION instead? Happy employees generally mean good performance. Job security is an important component of measuring Employee Engagement yet I work in an industry where 50% of the employees are part-time so right of the bat, the Employee Engagement scores are going to be lower.
Again, why the focus on measuring Employee Engagement over simple Employee Satisfaction? Is this the latest fad for organizational consultants to sell? I'm not an HR professional so I'd love to hear from those that are....Sign up
 

 
Can an Employee be Disengaged AND be a Good Performer?
Mark Williams, Management Consultant, United Kingdom, Member
Hi Jim. Not sure I can go along completely with your thought that "When someone is disengaged, all it really means is they have a life outside of thei...Sign up
 

   

Special Interest Group Leader

Interested? Sign up for free.


Organizational Commitment
Summary
Forum
Best Practices

Expert Tips

Resources
 



About 12manage | Advertising | Link to us / Cite us | Privacy | Suggestions | Terms of Service
2019 12manage - The Executive Fast Track. V15.0 - Last updated: 21-2-2019. All names of their owners.