Three Strategic Frameworks (Mulcaster)

Force Field Analysis
Knowledge Center

Forum

New Topic

Anneke Zwart
Student (University), Netherlands

Three Strategic Frameworks (Mulcaster)

Mulcaster (2008) developed 3 strategic frameworks that can be useful both in decision making and in strategy. All three frameworks will be briefly explained below:
1. OPPOSING FORCES APPROACH: This is an approach in which the advantages and disadvantages are seen as forces that can maximize an organization’s added value if managed efficiently (see: Force Field Analysis). This differs from the general approach to an organization's pros and cons, in which the advantages and disadvantages are simply seen as two lists that can be compared so as to determine the net benefits of an organization.
2. MANAGING FORCES: Any strategy is influenced by multiple forces that need to be considered both in decision making and in strategy implementation (see: Stakeholder Analysis). However, because of the large number of forces, some of them are often forgotten or they are not seen as significant. The principal purpose of the managing forces approach is to help assure that managers will consider even those forces in their decision making and in strategy building. Besides this, another purpose of this framework is to support managers in the way that those forces can be managed.
3. PERCEIVED DIFFERENTIAL VALUE: The Differential Value refers to the extent to which an organization’s product or service has more value to their consumers in comparison to their competitors. This is a very important determinant of competitiveness and can be improved in several ways (see: Competitive Advantage). Examples of ways to increase differential value is to improve quality, reliability and to increase a product’s features. The term perceived is also important in this case, since reflects the importance of the fact that managers should focus on customer’s perceived value of a product rather than taking their own opinions reflects customer’s perceptions (see: Unique Selling Proposition (USP).
Source: W. Mulcaster (2008) “Three Strategic Frameworks” Business Strategy Series Vol. 10 Iss.1 pp. 68-75

Start a new forum topic

 

More on Force Field Analysis
Summary
Forum
Organizational Change: How to Increase Driving Forces and How to Decrease Restraining Forces?
Implementation of Change in an Organisation
Force Field Analysis Helps to Consider Barriers Before Embarking Change
Identifying Change Drivers
Dynamism is the Interface to Change Issues
Post-Merger Force Fields
Using Force Field Analysis for Gender Analysis
🔥Measuring Driving and Restraining Forces - Metrics
The Human Factor in Force Field Analysis
Three Strategic Frameworks (Mulcaster)
Be a Change Catalyst
Force Field Diagram Assumptions
MSCS Concept in Force Field Analysis
Best Practices
Quotes by Kurt Lewin
Decreasing Restraining Forces is easier
Unfreeze, Changing and Refreeze
Where does Power Come From?
Origin of Force Field Analysis
Special Interest Group

Are you interested in Force Field Analysis? Sign up for free

Notify your students

Copy this into your study materials:

and add a hyperlink to:

Link to this discussion

Copy this HTML code to your web site:

Force Field Analysis
Knowledge Center



About 12manage | Advertising | Link to us / Cite us | Privacy | Suggestions | Terms of Service
© 2021 12manage - The Executive Fast Track. V15.8 - Last updated: 19-4-2021. All names ™ of their owners.