Consequentialist Theories in Business Ethics

Ethics and Responsibility

Forum
Dhiraj Khatri
Student (MBA), Australia

Consequentialist Theories in Business Ethics

Most theories pertaining to Business Ethics, Corporate Governance or Corporate Responsibility are either Consequentialist or Non-consequentialist by nature.
According to this branch of corporate governance, consequences alone determine whether an option is morally correct: "The end justifies the means". Hence, according to consequentialist theories the consequences of one's conduct are the ultimate basis for any judgment about the rightness or wrongness of that conduct. It might be okay to lie or act unethically in order to generate a greater happiness. Hence, the consequences decide how a decision should be made.
Utilitarianism and Egoism are two most prominent consequentialist theories. Here is some more information on the main Theories of Consequentialism:
  • UTILITARIANISM: An action is justified if it is generating greater good for all even at any harm. An example of this might be if the cruise ship is sinking and the captain has the chance of saving a 1000 lives at the cost of two. The act is considered to be justified by Utilitarians, as it is generating greater good at the end.

  • INDIVIDUAL ETHICAL EGOISM: In individual ethical egoism, individuals always act in order to generate an output which is in their best self interest. An example of this would be an athlete taking performance enhancers in order to stay ahead of his or her competitors.

  • UNIVERSAL ETHICAL EGOISM: This theory suggests that everybody ought to act in their best interest. Furthermore, it also states that one should be concerned with others well-being to the extent that it contributes to their self interest. An example of this might be the health and welfare programmes of corporations that also have an agenda to efficiently lower sick leaves at the workplace. Hence, the corporation is serving its employees with the purpose of serving its own interest.
It is prominent from each of the theories and the examples that with consequentialist theories consequences are of paramount importance while taking a moral standpoint.
⇒ Please share you further observations, cases or experiences of consequentialism in business organizations. Thank you.

Source: Hooker, B. (2000). Ideal Code, Real World: A Rule-consequentialist Theory of Morality. Oxford University Press, Chicago.

 

Forum
Why do People / Organizations Act Ethically?
Professional Management Code: The MBA Oath
Female Managers are More Ethical
👀Consequentialist Theories in Business Ethics
Emerging of Ethics After a Chaotic State
Ethics Oath for Public Servants?
The Difference between Ethics and Values
Economics with Spiritualism and Ethical Businesses are Needed
Ethics and the Ego-ridden Individual
Accountancy Ethics
Why are Business People / Managers not Ethical?
Integrity in Business: Definition and Issues
Buying a Problematic Business
Ethics is Universal, Flavor is Regional
Organizational Justice
Ethical Business Requires a Long Time Horizon
Planned Obsolescence: Ethical or Not?
When are Misdeed Committers Accepted as Advisors?
Ethical Issues in Using Social Media Conversation Data for Business
Is the term 'Third World' Ethical?
Success Requires Responsibility
About 'De' (德), an Ancient Chinese Moral and Ethical Virtue
🔥Confidentiality - Importance and Ethics
Ethical Issues in Human Resources Management
Loyalty in Business and Ethics
Personal Ethics and Responsibility Must Come First
The Need for a Global Business Ethics
Ethics in Public Administration
Shan Zhai and the Trickster
Best Practices
What if Superiors Have Different Ethics...
Doughnut Economics: 21st Century Economics

Ethics and Responsibility



About 12manage | Advertising | Link to us / Cite us | Privacy | Suggestions | Terms of Service
2022 12manage - The Executive Fast Track. V15.8 - Last updated: 7-7-2022. All names of their owners.