Facilitation Styles of van Maurik

Interventions
Knowledge Center

Forum
Anneke Zwart
Student (University), Netherlands

Facilitation Styles of van Maurik

J. van Maurik argues good facilitators are those who are able to give accurate and flexible responses to their teams. He develops four styles that can be used in the facilitation process, each of which is useful in different group characteristics. An effective facilitator will be able to draw from each of the approaches depending on the needs of the group being facilitated.
Facilitation Approaches (Styles), van Maurik1: Intellectual Command. High level of facts and data input to the group, combined with a low degree of intervening into the way of interaction of the group. The facilitator needs to guide by providing clear standpoints, answers to questions, but also by challenging the group and inputting knowledge where needed. This approach is especially appropriate in teams that have clear goals but that are still demanding specialist intellect and information.
2: Creative Group Catalyst. Low degree of input of data, opinion and information together with a low intervention level into the group process. This approach is used in groups that want to find solutions to their problems themselves; they know their own strengths and weaknesses themselves. The facilitator is guiding towards accomplishing the objectives and to stimulate group members to be more creative and productive. In other words, the facilitator needs to encourage the group but in a covert way. After some guidance the facilitator need to step back and let the group members take control. This style is often used once teams are developing and becoming mature, since the more groups get used to draw conclusions themselves, the less input and intervention is needed.
3: Incentives Approach. High degree of information and data input combined with a intervention level in the interaction of the group process. This approach will be appropriate in groups where energy and commitment is lacking, where some members are clearly cynic and in groups that disagree with the tasks and goals of the group. . The facilitator is responsible to analyze the situation and after that to move the group to a positive and efficient atmosphere.
4: Supportive Coach. Also a low level of information and data input, but combined with a high degree of intervention into the group process. This style is useful in teams in which confidence is lacking. The facilitator needs to analyze and listen; he or she needs to know how and when to stimulate group members, when to help and when to select those who have difficulties in particular. This approach increases motivation though rising both group and individual confidence.
Source: Maurik, J. van, (1994)."Facilitating Excellence: Styles and Processes of Facilitation". Leadership & Organization Development Journal, Vol. 15 Iss: 8 pp. 30 - 34

  Jolanta
Management Consultant, Poland
 

Supportive Role?? What is the Basis of an Effective Facilitator?

I'm wondering what kind of data/information the faciliator should have as in a SUPPORT role as it is defined as "support...

  Jaap de Jonge
Editor, Netherlands
 

The Support Role in van Maurik's Facilitation Approaches

@Jolanta : I agree that normally a facilitator is not contributing to the content of the problem the group is working o...

 

More on Interventions:
Summary
Forum
👀Facilitation Styles of van Maurik
🔥Corrupt Interventions after Heron
Four Sets of Activities of Donaghue
How to Become an Authority as a Consultant?
Special Interest Group

Do you have a keen interest in Interventions? Become our SIG Leader

Interventions
Knowledge Center



About 12manage | Advertising | Link to us / Cite us | Privacy | Suggestions | Terms of Service
2022 12manage - The Executive Fast Track. V15.8 - Last updated: 29-6-2022. All names of their owners.