The Paradox of Deliberate and Emergent Strategy


 
Emergent Strategy > Best Practices Log in

The Paradox of Deliberate and Emergent Strategy
Pat Hannon, Lecturer, Ireland, Member
Mintzberg and Waters (1985) state that few strategies were purely deliberate or emergent, but normally a mix of the two is used. Understanding the internal political dynamics of the organisation and detailed analysis of the external environment is essential in shaping strategy. Strategy should be shaped on what is feasible, attainable and not on what is ideal.
Deliberate strategy gives direction and commitment while emergence allows for opportunism, flexibility and ongoing learning. This would suggest that deliberate and emergent strategies are opposite so managers need to choose one strategy at the expense of the other not so.
Managers would like to forecast the future and design plans to to prepare for it. Yet on the other hand some managers believe that experimentation learning and flexibility are needed to deal with the unpredictability of the future. However while implementing deliberate strategies the uncertainty of the environment may throw up emergent strategies. Even...Sign up
 

 
Ambidexterity in Strategic Management
Iqbal Hussain, Manager, United Kingdom, Member
Ambidexterity is the ability to use both the left and right hand equally.
 

 
Combining Deliberate AND Emergent Strategy
Vivek Joshi
Emergent Strategy certainly has its merits, particularly in (very) dynamic environments.
But a prerequisite is that a well crafted Deliberate Str...Sign up
 

 















 


Special Interest Group Leader

Emergent Strategy
Summary
Forum

Best Practices
Expert Tips

Resources



About 12manage | Advertising | Link to us / Cite us | Privacy | Suggestions | Terms of Service
2018 12manage - The Executive Fast Track. V15.0 - Last updated: 14-12-2018. All names of their owners.