|
Please register now to read all responses and to join this discussion yourself. It's easy and 100% free.
|
|
S Nair
|
Elimination of measuring the quality, productivity & performance (system + individual) at each and every stage of production or development do not help any business survive long in the market, for sure. Deming's principles are overly people dependent and blame the system when something goes wrong, which might not be true most of the time. This would have probably increased waste, inventory, production/labour costs while significantly lowering the productivity. It probably worked in the 40's and 70's just because nothing else existed.
In modern business environments, TQM/TPS principles might be used as a mere reference while embracing the concepts of Six Sigma and LEAN which are more process/data oriented and proven beyond doubt. (...) Read more? Sign up for free
|
|
Please register now to read all responses and to join this discussion yourself. It's easy and 100% free.
Sign up for free Log in
|
| |
|
Ahmad Altarawneh, Senior Market Adviser,MENA Region, United Arab Emirates
|
|
Measuring Quality or Not?
Based on this view, are we to say that Deming's Pr (...)
|
| |
|
Jagadeesh, Professor, India
|
|
TQM vs Taylorism
Quality basically demands commitment and disciplin (...)
|
| |
|
Jagadeesh, Professor, India
|
|
Concern and Consciousness for Quality are Essential to Improve it
Unless people are really serious and conscious of (...)
|
|
