The Cynefin Framework

Contingency Theory
Knowledge Center

Best Practices
Jaap de Jonge
Editor, Netherlands

The Cynefin Framework

A recent application of contingency thinking on decision-making is the Cynefin framework described by David J. Snowden and Mary E. Boone in the HBR of Nov 2007. They distinguish between 5 decision-making contexts, each requiring its own decision-making style:
I. Simple
- Characteristics of context / How can you recognize it? Clear causes and effect.
- Recommended Decision-making style: Ensure proper processes are in place, delegate. Apply the best practice.
- Decision model: Sense ⇒ Categorize ⇒ Respond.
II. Complicated
- Characteristics of context / How can you recognize it? Cause and effect relationships discoverable, but not apparent to everyone.
- Recommended Decision-making style: Involve (teams of) experts, analyze. Apply a good practice.
- Decision model: Sense ⇒ Analyze ⇒ Respond.
III. Complex
- Characteristics of context / How can you recognize it? No causality, emergence, flux.
- Recommended Decision-making style: Create safe experiments, wait for patterns to emerge. Then amplify or dampen/drop. Apply the emergent practice.
- Decision model: Probe ⇒ Sense ⇒ Respond.
IV. Chaotic
- Characteristics of context / How can you recognize it? Turbulence, crisis
- Recommended Decision-making style: Take immediate action, communicate clear and directly. Apply a novel practice.
- Decision model: Act ⇒ Sense ⇒ Respond
V. Disorder
- Characteristics of context / How can you recognize it? None of the 4 above is prevailing or at least it is not known which one is prevailing.
- Recommended Decision-making style: Break down into the other 4 realms.

Adept decision-makers should learn how to:
1. Identify the context properly
2. Change their behavior and decisions to match that context
3. Prepare their organizations to understand and deal with the different contexts.

See also the Stacey Matrix.

  Gary Wong
Consultant, Canada
 

Cynefin Simple Domain Renamed to 'Obvious Domain'

The Cynefin Framework is a sufficient, but always partial view of reality. As additional information arrives and new ins...

  Jaap de Jonge
Editor, Netherlands
 

3 Approaches to Build Organizational Resilience

Along the same lines, Suarez and Montes mention 3 broad categories and corresponding approaches to getting work done and...

 

More on Contingency Theory:
Summary
Forum
Why Fiedler's Contingency Theory?
🔥Type 1 and Type 2 Decisions (Jeff Bezos)
The Stacey Matrix
Contingency Theory in 2 Countries
Contingencies Affecting Management Development
History of Contingency Theory
Donaldson's Neocontingency Model
Mission and Objectives > Leadership
Individual Unit of Analysis
How to Apply / Implement Contingency Theories in a Context
Best Practices
Discuss Contingency Theory
Effects of Contigency Variables
Right Way In Information Age
Major Weeknesses of Contigency Leadership Approach
👀The Cynefin Framework
Contingency Theory Strengths
What is the Difference between the Contingency Theory versus the Situational Theory of Leadership?
Special Interest Group

Do you have a keen interest in Contingency Theory? Become our SIG Leader

Contingency Theory
Knowledge Center



About 12manage | Advertising | Link to us / Cite us | Privacy | Suggestions | Terms of Service
2022 12manage - The Executive Fast Track. V15.8 - Last updated: 7-7-2022. All names of their owners.