Are Clayton Christensenís Disruptive Innovation Characteristics Useful in Practice?

Disruptive Innovation
Knowledge Center

 

Next Topic

Disruptive Innovation > Forum > Are Clayton Christensenís Disruptive Innovation Characteristics Useful in Practice?

Are Clayton Christensenís Disruptive Innovation Characteristics Useful in Practice?
Rick Mueller, Professor, United States, SIG Leader
A recent write up published in MIT Sloan Management Review concludes that Disruptive Innovation theory is "not very useful" for making predictions based on research in which 77 cases from Christensenís first two books (The Innovatorís Dilemma and The Innovator's Solution) were checked for four characteristics deemed to be fundamental to Disruptive Innovation:

  1. Incumbents improving along a trajectory of sustaining innovation.
  2. They overshoot customer needs.
  3. They possess the capability to respond to disruptive threats.
  4. They end up floundering as a result of the disruption.
Professor Andrew A. King and Baljir Baatartogtokh assert that only 7 of the cases contained all 4 of the elements of the theory. The majority of the 77 cases included different motivating forces (such as legacy costs, the ef... Read more? Sign up for free
 

     

Read all responses and join this discussion yourself.
Support your career and personal development with 12manage, the management platform.

    Log in


Special Interest Group Leader
Rick Mueller
Professor

Disruptive Innovation
Summary
Forum
Best Practices


Disruptive Innovation
Knowledge Center

 

Next Topic



About 12manage | Advertising | Link to us / Cite us | Privacy | Suggestions | Terms of Service
© 2019 12manage - The Executive Fast Track. V15.2 - Last updated: 20-11-2019. All names ô of their owners.