Are Clayton Christensenís Disruptive Innovation Characteristics Useful in Practice?


 
Disruptive Innovation > Forum Log in

Are Clayton Christensenís Disruptive Innovation Characteristics Useful in Practice?
Rick Mueller, Student (University), United States

A recent write up published in MIT Sloan Management Review concludes that Disruptive Innovation theory is "not very useful" for making predictions based on research in which 77 cases from Christensenís first two books (The Innovatorís Dilemma and The Innovator's Solution) were checked for four characteristics deemed to be fundamental to Disruptive Innovation:

  1. Incumbents improving along a trajectory of sustaining innovation.
  2. They overshoot customer needs.
  3. They possess the capability to respond to disruptive threats.
  4. They end up floundering as a result of the disruption.
Professor Andrew A. King and Baljir Baatartogtokh assert that only 7 of the cases contained all 4 of the elements of the theory. The majority of the 77 cases included different motivating forces (such as legacy costs, the effect of numerous competitors, changing economies of scale, and shifting social conditions) or displayed unpredicted outcomes.
Thoughts?
More information: Digital Journal
 

 















 

  Do you wish to study further? You can learn more from the summary, forum, discussions, lessons, courses, training, instructions, expert tips, best practices and education sources. Register.  


Special Interest Group Leader
Rick Mueller
Student (University)

More on Disruptive Innovation
Summary
Forum
Best Practices

Expert Tips

Resources

About 12manage | Advertising | Link to us | Privacy | Terms of Service
Copyright 2017 12manage - The Executive Fast Track. V14.1 - Last updated: 26-9-2017. All names tm by their owners.