|
rafita, Indonesia
|
In a crisis situation, which one is better: centralized or decentralized? On one hand in a crisis condition urgent decisions regarding actions have to be made. On the other hand, the need of a democratic decision is also bigger. How can we manage this situation? (...) Read more? Sign up for free
|
Please register now to read all responses and to join this discussion yourself. It's easy and 100% free.
Sign up for free Log in
|
| |
|
Siyat Gaye
|
|
Centralization or Decentralization in Crisis?
Decentralization is more democratic in terms of decision making as it allows for initiatives and the use of talents.However, decentralization is not suitable in times of crisis.This is because a crisis is fluid and delicate situation which requires urgent, decisive and firm action. In times of crisis unity of command and direction is central.
|
| |
|
Shweta S Awasthi, India
|
|
Don't Agree
A visionary and a leader is much more important to a large org as compared to a smaller one. This is because in smaller organisations, people are generally much more self-motivated. This makes me believe that decentralisation should be prevail more in larger ones; however, that's an ideal set-up anywhere!
|
| |
|
Edwin Eka, HR Consultant, Indonesia
|
|
Wrong Question...
Centralized & Decentralized is about organizing th (...)
|
| |
|
Samrat, India
|
|
Crisis Situation: Select an Efficient Leader
I believe during a crisis situation, power should (...)
|
| |
|
AMIT ANAND, Manager, India
|
|
During Crisis, Decentralization is More Effective
In case of crisis, decentralization is more effect (...)
|
|
