Obvious or not true after all?

Theory of Mechanistic and Organic Systems > Best Practices Premium

Obvious or not true after all?
I was reading over this summary of the organic-mechanistic typology of Burns and Stalker, and at first sight it seems simple and logical: the best way to organize a company is contingent upon its environment in the following way:
If the environment of the firms is stable, go for the mechanistic organization type.
If the environment is changing (quickly), the organic organization form is preferable.
HOWEVER, assuming we all live in a fast-changing world (who would disagree with that), how come that we still find so many mechanistic organizations??? Maybe there's more to it than Burns and Stalker thought... I wonder what?

Resistance to Change
Alex Lowy
Countering Burns and Stalker's observation is the ...

Mixture of both
Well in my opinion not many organization are optin...

Mix of organic and mechanistic
Thanks Bwana for your correction, of course in rea...

Fast Changing world?
Brendan Dunphy
The world as a whole may be changing more quickly ...

Creating an organic organization
Many people (employees) have difficulty or dislike...

Mechanistic vs Organic Systems
Why are there so many mechanistic organisations? T...

Burns & Stalkers Typology
ullhas Pagey
Though Burns and Stalker typology provides a compr...

Burns and Stalker right or wrong?
I believe that Hein makes a fair comment. However ...


  Do you wish to study further? You can learn more from the summary, forum, discussions, lessons, courses, training, instructions, expert tips, best practices and education sources. Register.  

Special Interest Group Leader

You here

More on Theory of Mechanistic and Organic Systems

Best Practices
  • Obvious or not true after all?

Expert Tips


About 12manage | Advertising | Link to us / Cite us | Privacy | Suggestions | Terms of Service
2018 12manage - The Executive Fast Track. V14.1 - Last updated: 26-9-2018. All names of their owners.