All about Theory of Mechanistic and Organic Systems
Learn from colleagues and experts
Join now. Completely free.
Log in
X
Why register?
Welcome to the world's #1 website about management.
- Discover 1000s of knowledge centers.
- Learn from colleagues and experts.
- Share best practices with 1,000,000 members.
- Accelerate your management career.
- Completely free.
Log in
|
Obvious or not true after all?
Hein
I was reading over this summary of the organic-mechanistic typology of Burns and Stalker, and at first sight it seems simple and logical: the best way to organize a company is contingent upon its environment in the following way:
If the environment of the firms is stable, go for the mechanistic organization type.
If the environment is changing (quickly), the organic organization form is preferable.
HOWEVER, assuming we all live in a fast-changing world (who would disagree with that), how come that we still find so many mechanistic organizations??? Maybe there's more to it than Burns and Stalker thought... I wonder what?
|
|
| |
Do you wish to study further? You can learn more from the summary, forum, discussions, lessons, courses, training, instructions, expert tips, best practices and education sources. Register.
|
|
|
|
|
Special Interest Group Leader
|
|
|
More on Theory of Mechanistic and Organic Systems
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
