Taking Advantage of Conflicts in Group Decision Making

Six Thinking Hats
Knowledge Center

Best Practices

Sign up

Anneke Zwart
Student (University), Netherlands

Taking Advantage of Conflicts in Group Decision Making

In past research it was often argued that group decision making (GDM) improves if task-conflicts are present.
Task-conflicts are different opinions about the content and outcomes of the task being
Why this positive effect? Because task-conflicts prevent premature consensus and encourage critical thinking. It seems obvious. But other studies found no such relationship or even a negative one. The relationship between tasks conflicts and good GDM is thus ambiguous.

De Wit, Jehn and Scheepers have recently discovered that another factor is playing an important role when we're analyzing the extent to which task-conflicts are beneficial for GDM: the presence (or absence) of a relationship conflict.
According to the authors, task conflicts are more likely to have a positive effect on GDM if relationship conflicts are absent in the company.

They suggest 2 possibilities in which a relationship conflict negatively affects the relationship between task conflict and GDM:
1. A relationship conflict causes rigidity: Frictions, negative emotions, or antipathy towards others leads to certain reactions in a debate that are likely to spill over to other group members. The flexible, open-minded attitude in debates becomes more rigid and closed as a result and the willingness to accord to opinions of other group members is reduced. Rather people will rigidly hold their initial opinions.
2. A relationship conflict creates processing information biases: In healthy decision-making processes, group members use their own information as well as information they can obtain from other team members. However, if relationship conflicts are present group members often decide to only use their own information when making decisions.
Both of these possibilities are hard to measure. However, the study of de Wit argues that in assessing the relationship between task conflicts and GDM it is important to take other factors into account that indirectly affect this relationship.
Source: de Wit, F. R., Jehn, K. A., and Scheepers, D. (2013). Task conflict, information processing, and decision-making: The damaging effect of relationship conflict. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 122(2), 177-189.

  Jaap de Jonge
Editor, Netherlands

How to Benefit from Conflicts in Group Decision Making?

I believe Bono's 6 Thinking Hats (6TH) might be qu (...)

Lecturer, India

Quality of Decision Making Depends on the Intent of the Individuals in the Group

I believe the quality of the decision making depen (...)

  Ben Smith
Manager, United Kingdom

How to Measure Relationship Conflict?

It must be difficult to measure the presence/absen (...)

  Ruwan Bandara
Manager, Sri Lanka

Conflict can be a Source of Inspiration

Conflicts motivate us to think in an extraordinary (...)

  Leena Bissoonauth
Student (University), Mauritius

How Relationship Conflict can Be Reduced for Better Decision Making

Low levels of conflict in a group may improve the (...)

Accountant, Zambia

Group Bonding and Tenure is Important

Relationship conflicts may help enhance GDM. Howev (...)

  Purna Chandra
Business Consultant, India

The 3rd Alternative in Conflicts: 'Our Way'

The topic reminds me of the concept in the book "T (...)

  Victor Manuel Monteiro Seco
Entrepreneur, Portugal

Our Way, Because we are not Alone

@Purna Chandra: Indeed. we have no conflicts alone (...)

  Willie Odemwingie
Lecturer, Nigeria

Conflicts in GDM

People that make up a group are usually from diffe (...)

  Satya Narayan
Strategy Consultant, India

How to Benefit from Group Decision Making?

1. First the organisation needs to ensure conflict (...)

Consultant, India

Selfless Group Decision Making

Group Decision Making with cross functional team m (...)

  Gary Wong
Consultant, Canada

Applying the Six Thinking Hats Method to Group Conflict

As this is the 6TH forum, has any contributor appl (...)

  Gary Wong
Consultant, Canada

Six Thinking Hats and the Covey's 3rd Alternative: 'Our Way'

@Purna Chandra: Great observation! As a Franklin C (...)

  Ken Sylvester

Most Important in GDM: Dealing with Self-Interest. What Conflict Models can Resolve that?

I remain a constant learner as regards conflict. M (...)

Lecturer, India

GDM Outcome Depends on 23 Aspects of Human System

There is a relationship between the outcome (and e (...)

Professor, India

Group Conflict Management

Group conflicts on matters of importance is a welc (...)

  Tan Poh Lip

The Emotional Bank Account (EBA) versus Conflicts

For me, conflict is happening everywhere in our pe (...)

  Ruwan Bandara
Manager, Sri Lanka

How to Benefit from Conflicts in a Group

I was delighted the different perspective post of (...)

Accountant, Zambia

23 Aspects of the Human System

@srinivas: I find the reference to the 23 aspects (...)

Lecturer, India


Please find here the requested list of human aspec (...)

  Gary Wong
Consultant, Canada

The Emotional Bank Account and 6TH

@Tan Poh Lip: The Emotional Bank Account (EBA) is (...)

Consultant, India

The Purpose of Group Decision Making

The very purpose of group decision making is to ma (...)

Lecturer, India

Role of Impressions in Subconscious Mind in Decision Making

I agree @Emotion Bank Account deposits have a role (...)

  melchiorre calabrese
Manager, Italy

Avoiding Emotional Conflicts in Group Decision Making

The problem of relationship conflicts must be solv (...)

Lecturer, India

Preconceived Notions in Group Decision Making

@melchiorre calabrese: I completely agree with you (...)

  melchiorre calabrese
Manager, Italy

Preconceived Notions in Group Decision Making

@Srinivas: Thanks for your consideration! Please, (...)

  Gary Wong
Consultant, Canada

Revisiting the Purpose of the Six Thinking Hats

@Melchiorre calabrese, srinivas: I appreciate you (...)

  Ruwan Bandara
Manager, Sri Lanka

Black & White Hat Together

@Gary Wong: This idea is not wrong. Using Six Hats (...)

  Gary Wong
Consultant, Canada

Colours Can Have Different Meanings

Hi, everyone. Ruwan and I have been messaging each (...)

Lecturer, India

Conflict Resolution at the Level of Consciousness in Decision Making in Groups

I'd like to enhance and clarify my earlier @reacti (...)

Start a new forum topic


More on Six Thinking Hats
Techniques for Real Dialogue in Organisations
Six Thinking Hats is Parallel Thinking
Instilling Constructive Participation: 15-minute Soliloquy
Everybody Should Wear More Than 1 Hat
Switching Hats by Top Managers
Business Conflict Resolution
Seventh Thinking Hat: Grey for Wisdom
Tools to Consider Multiple Perspectives
Avoiding Groupthink with 6 Thinking Hats Process
Distorted Western Adversarial Thinking
Six Hats really great
Can Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Improve Thinking?
Current Status of Six Thinking Hats? Hot News
Conditions for 6 Thinking Hats. Assumptions
Six Thinking Hats for Instructional Design
The Role of the Group Facilitator in Six Thinking Hats
Additional 7th Thinking Hat?
🔥Edward de Bono Obituary
How to Facilitate Mutual Understanding and Conflict Resolution
Six Hats Certification
Six Thinking Hats for Software Testing at Google
Six Thinking Hats is Great for Exploring All Points of View
Best Practices
Clarification: Team Process
Resolving a Business Argument
Situational Thinking Hats?
Examples of Using Six Hats Thinking
Telecom Example of Six Thinking Hats
Wearing the Blue Hat
Challenging Plans or Ideas: The Ritual Dissent Approach
6 Thinking Hats are Rubbish
Systematic, Deliberate Thinking is not Easy to Do
Six Hats Great for Teaching at University
Six Hats is Universally Applicable
Taking Advantage of Conflicts in Group Decision Making
Special Interest Group
Gary Wong

Six Thinking Hats
Knowledge Center

About 12manage | Advertising | Link to us / Cite us | Privacy | Suggestions | Terms of Service
2021 12manage - The Executive Fast Track. V15.8 - Last updated: 28-7-2021. All names of their owners.