Criticism of Situational Leadership Model

Criticism of Situational Leadership Model

For me Hersey-Blanchard have, badly, mixed the Managerial Grid and the Tannenbaum-Schmidt Continuum.
Some descriptions are illogical:

1. Coaching is not a management ‘style’ and doesn't correlate with “Telling”. I consider that the 'Manager' role includes leading (management activities are to do with the task aspects [planning, organising &c.] while leading activities are to do with the people aspects [communicating, motivating &c.] These need to be balanced (Blake-Mouton, Adair et al).
2. Although the SL model does distinguish between "low", "some" and "high" competence, it doesn't distinguish trained workers from experienced workers. The S1 aspect relates to Trained Worker Standard but the S2/3 aspects seem confused over the Experienced Worker Standard.
   TRAINED WORKER STANDARD is when the person has been trained and is 'competent' in how to do 'it' while concentrating on and thinking about 'it' but not yet sufficiently practised/experienced to do it "unthinkingly".
   EXPERIENCED WORKER STANDARD. When the person has the full (kinesthetic-'muscle sense) 'feel' of 'it' they are at the Experienced Worker Standard. In this sense it refers to physical activities but the concept is also applicable to thinking (managerial, management, leadership) activities in which routines and processes are carried out as a matter of "second nature". For example sub-consciously adapting ones behaviour to the situation and the experience of the person you are working (managing-leading) with.

		Comments Sort by date Sort by rating Rating
		1 Michael Horwitz Professor, United States
	Analyzing Readiness is not a Problem with SL I’m not sure I understand how you describe a problem with SL. Trained versus experienced only matte... Sign up

		1 Jaap de Jonge Editor, Netherlands
	Competence Subcategories Missing in Situational Leadership? @Michael Horwitz: The extent to which a person is competent (you call this readiness) or not is one ... Sign up

		2 Michael Horwitz Professor, United States
	Readiness in Situational Leadership is Key The first step in the SL model is to determine readiness (not competence) of the follower, which is ... Sign up

		0 Maurice Hogarth Consultant, United Kingdom
	SL Model Dissonances @Michael Horwitz: Concerns: 1. There are several variations on the style label referents. 2. "Is t... Sign up

		3 Steve G
	Blanchard Leadership Theory is Correct Most of the comments on shortcomings of the theory reflect the authors failure to understand the the... Sign up

		0 Maurice Hogarth Consultant, United Kingdom
	Correct Concerns @Steve G: I agree with all of your points. It is because I do not understand the theory, as describ... Sign up

		1 Jaap de Jonge Editor, Netherlands
	Limitations of Situational Leadership Model One more limitation (criticism) of SL is an obvious one, but must not be overlooked. In the SL m... Sign up