|
Get access now to all 12manage knowledge centers and discussion forums, including Situational LeadershipⓇ. Completely free.
|
|
Maurice Hogarth
Consultant, United Kingdom
|
🔥 NEW For me Hersey-Blanchard have, badly, mixed the Managerial Grid and the Tannenbaum-Schmidt Continuum.
Some descriptions are illogical:
Coaching is not a management ‘style’ and doesn't correlate with “Telling”. I consider that the 'Manager' role includes leading (management activities are to do with the task aspects [planning, organising &c.] while leading activities are to do with the people aspects [communicating, motivating &c.] These need to be balanced (Blake-Mouton, Adair et al).
Although the SL model does distinguish between "low", "some" and "high" competence, it doesn't distinguish trained workers from experienced workers. The S1 aspect relates to Trained Worker Standard but the S2/3 aspects seem confused over the Experienced Worker Standard.
TRAINED WORKER STANDARD is when the person has been trained and is 'competent' in how to do 'it' while concentrating on and thinking about 'it' but not yet sufficiently practised/experienced to do it "unthinkingly".
EXPERIENCED W (...) Read more? Sign up for free
X
All about Situational LeadershipⓇ and business administration. Completely free.
Log in
| |
|
Michael Horwitz
Professor, United States
|
|
Analyzing Readiness is not a Problem with SL
I’m not sure I understand how you describe a probl (...)
|
| |
|
Jaap de Jonge
Editor, Netherlands
|
|
Competence Subcategories Missing in Situational Leadership?
@Michael Horwitz: The extent to which a person is (...)
|
| |
|
Michael Horwitz
Professor, United States
|
|
Readiness in Situational Leadership is Key
The first step in the SL model is to determine rea (...)
|
| |
|
Maurice Hogarth
Consultant, United Kingdom
|
|
SL Model Dissonances
@Michael Horwitz: Concerns:
1. There are several (...)
|
|
