ABC or TOC? The Differences between Activity Based Costing and the Theory of Constraints

Activity Based Costing
Knowledge Center

 

Next Topic

Activity Based Costing > Forum > ABC or TOC? The Differences between Activity Based Costing and the Theory of Constraints

ABC or TOC? The Differences between Activity Based Costing and the Theory of Constraints
Anneke Zwart, Student (University), Netherlands, Member

In past literature, the Theory of Constraints (TOC) has been seen as more or less contradicting the concept of ABC-costing and its assumptions. The main contradictions between ABC and TOC mentioned in those studies are: 1. Variable costs: While the assumes that there exist few variable costs in an organization, ABC-costing assumes the largest part of a companies’ resources are variable ones. It is for this reasons that the TOC is seen by some as a short-term technique, and ABC-costing as a long-term one. 2. Bottlenecks Resources: - The TOC argues that constraining resources or the outputs with the lowest capacity should be improved. In other words, the bottleneck resources that cause the highest costs in a company should be improved so as to maximize efficiency. - ABC-costing, however, implicitly assumes no bottleneck resources to be present in an organization, but rather certain activities are seen as barriers. In ABC-costing, total resources purchased should be equivalent to co (...) Read more? Sign up for free
 

Please register now to read all responses and to join this discussion yourself. It's easy and 100% free.

Sign up for free     Log in


         
Special Interest Group Leader

Interested? Sign up for free.


Activity Based Costing
Summary
Forum
Best Practices


Activity Based Costing
Knowledge Center

 

Next Topic



About 12manage | Advertising | Link to us / Cite us | Privacy | Suggestions | Terms of Service
© 2020 12manage - The Executive Fast Track. V15.4 - Last updated: 28-3-2020. All names ™ of their owners.