Tacit Knowledge

Knowledge Center

• About
• Home
• Dictionary
• Encyclopedia
• Question?
• Views

• Register
• Log in
• Help

• Change & Organization
• Communication & Skills
• Decision-making & Valuation
• Ethics & Responsibility
• Finance & Investing
• HRM
• Knowledge & Intangibles
• Leadership
• Marketing
• Program & Project
• Strategy
• Supply Chain & Quality

Description of Tacit Knowledge in Organizations. Explanation.

Definition Tacit Knowledge. Description.

Tacit Knowledge is one of two categories of knowledge. The other is: Explicit Knowledge. While explicit knowledge is relatively easy to capture and code in organizations, this is much more difficult with tacit knowledge. As a result, most organizations have concentrated their knowledge management efforts on developing explicit knowledge.

However, tacit knowledge is generally the more important category, because it is often a source of the Core Competence and the Competitive Advantage of any corporation. As a competitive advantage, it is sustainable, because it is so hard to copy or imitate. Furthermore it is crucial for making the right business decisions and also for innovation. From a financial perspective it is an important part of the Intangible Assets of any firm.

The term "tacit knowing" was coined by scientist and philosopher Michael Polanyi. It is important to note that he actually described a process (hence: tacit knowing), and not a form of knowledge.

One way of viewing tacit knowledge is to see it as the glue that is binding the explicit knowledge together. Another way to describe it, is as “know-how”, as opposed to: “know-what” (facts), or “know-why” (science). Another way is to make distinction between embodied knowledge and theoretical knowledge. On this account, knowing-how or embodied knowledge is characteristic of the expert, who acts, makes judgments, and so forth without explicitly reflecting on the principles or rules involved. The expert works without having a theory of his or her work; he or she just performs skillfully without deliberation or focused attention. Knowing-what and knowing-why, by contrast, involve consciously accessible knowledge that can be articulated and is characteristic of the person learning a skill through explicit instruction, recitation of rules, attention to his or her movements, etc. While such declarative knowledge may be needed for the acquisition of skills, the argument goes, it no longer becomes necessary for the practice of those skills once the novice becomes an expert in exercising them, and indeed it does seem to be the case that, as Polanyi argued, when we acquire a skill, we acquire a corresponding understanding that defies articulation.

Tacit Knowledge is difficult to codify, document, communicate, describe, replicate or imitate, because it is the result of human experience and human senses. The skills of a master or of a top manager cannot be learned from a textbook or even in a class, but only through years of experience and apprenticeship.

Nonaka and Takeuchi describe tacit knowledge as a non-linguistic, non-numerical form of knowledge that is highly personal and context specific and deeply rooted in individual experiences, ideas, values and emotions. Furthermore, they distinguish between technical tacit knowledge, meaning skills or concrete "know-how", and cognitive tacit knowledge, which refers to ingrained schema, beliefs, and mental models that are taken for granted.

P. Baumard (Tacit Knowledge in Organizations, 1999) has argued that knowledge in general, and tacit knowledge in particular, can be both an attribute of individuals and of groups, collectives or organizations. Although organizational tacit knowledge may be somewhat different from individual tacit knowledge. See also: Bridging Epistemologies

Hildreth and Kimble (The duality of knowledge, 2002) argue that the common approach to try to convert tacit knowledge to explicit knowledge, and then handle it using the 'traditional' approach is flawed. Some knowledge simply cannot be captured. A method is needed which recognizes that knowledge resides in people: not in machines or documents. They argue that knowledge management is essentially about people and the earlier technology driven approaches, which failed to consider this, were bound to be limited in their success. They suggest as practical way forward to use Communities of Practice, which provide an environment for people to develop knowledge through interaction with others in an environment where knowledge is created nurtured and sustained. Other systems via which organizations try to develop or capture tacit knowledge include special portals, search engines, resident experts, and documentation systems for experts.
 

Tacit Knowledge Special Interest Group Special Interest Group (55 members)

Tacit Knowledge Forum   Recent topics   How to Identify and Measure Tacit Knowledge? I want to evaluate the faculty tacit knowledge. Does anybody have empirical or practical knowledge about this subject? Thanks in advance....           Know How, Know What and Know When Tacit knowledge is an essential part of the "profound knowledge" as referred by Deming. It let us manage "know how" with "know what" and "know ...           Indiginious Knowledge This tacit knowledge is lke to indiginious knowledge. It should be nursed with high care. Any country or organization can progress by using its tacit ...           Recording Tacit Knowledge A skill matrix is useful for recording employees knowledge bank on subject matters. When required, it can be like a library to seek out an "exp...           Tacit Knowledge -- Grapevine In an organisation, another useful source of knowledge is the "GRAPEVINE". It is defined as: the informal transmission of information, gossi...           Using Tacit Knowledge for Organogram If we can measure the knowledge of an employee then we can suitably post him in the hierarchy of the organization. Since the           Communities of Practice I noticed an interesting article in the Harvard BR March 2010) providing some interesting thoughts on communities of practice. According to authors Ri...           Has Polanyi Been Misunderstood? Tacit vs. Explicit Knowledge “The ideal of a strictly explicit knowledge is indeed self-contradictory; deprived of their tacit coefficients, all spoken words, all formulae, all ma...           How to Transfer Tacit Experience Globally Along with Chinese companies going global comes the need to reducing ramp-up time and cutting costs during knowledge and experience transfer. Investin...           Tacit Knowledge in Business Management Indeed tacit knowledge has not been given its due (what it deserves) in general management practise. In an environment where there is inadequate...           Performance Contracting for Tertiary Institutions in Kenya - The Death Bed of Innovation While performance contracting has its place in quantifiable tasks, it leaves many questions than answers when introduced in a technical middle level i...

Best Practices - Tacit Knowledge   Reliance on Tacit Knowledge Westerners seem to denigrate the role of tacit knowledge in job performance without objective justification. Thus, without objective justification, I ...

Expert Tips - Tacit Knowledge   How to Identify and Map Knowledge       Positive Effects of Age Diversity on Company Productivity and (Tacit) Knowledge Sharing       Capturing Learned Lessons       Barriers that Hinder Effective Knowledge Sharing       The N-Form Organization (Hedlund)       Knowledge Management Scope       Knowledge Management Focal Point

Resources - Tacit Knowledge People and Latent Knowledge in Organizational Learning   Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning   Revisiting Knowledge Management   How to Improve Knowledge Sharing in Knowledge-intensive Organizations   Overview of Existing Types of Knowledge   Knowledge Management Systems Architecture   Management Accounting of Intangible Assets   Leveraging Cognition for Competitive Advantage:A Knowledge-Based Strategy Process   Knowledge Sharing and Organizational Learning through Communities of Practices   Introduction and Summary of SECI   Introduction and Summary of Intangible Assets (IAS38)   3 Pillars of KM   N-Form Organization     News about Tacit Knowledge         Videos about Tacit Knowledge         Presentations about Tacit Knowledge         Books about Tacit Knowledge         More about Tacit Knowledge

Compare with: SECI model  |  Bridging Epistemologies  |  Johari Window  |  Organizational Learning  |  Organizational Memory  |  Action Learning  |  Knowledge Management (Collison & Parcell)  |  Causal Ambiguity  |  Analogical Strategic Reasoning  |  Bounded Rationality  |  Synectics  |  Storytelling

Return to Management Hub: Communication & Skills  |  Knowledge & Intangibles  |  Strategy

More on Management  |  Return to Management Dictionary  | 

This ends our Tacit Knowledge summary and forum.