Theory E and Theory O

Knowledge Center



Summary, forum, best practices, expert tips and information sources.

Contributed by: Jerry Watson

14 items • 84.872 visits


Summary

What are Theory E and Theory O? Meaning.

Theory E and Theory O are two different approaches to deal with organizational change. According to M. Beer and N. Nohria they should be combined.

In their article "Cracking the Code of Change" (Harvard Business Review, May-June 2000: 133-141), the authors describe two theories:

  • Theory E: Theory E change strategies are aimed at realizing Economic value. Hence the E. In this “Hard” approach to change, Shareholder Value is the only legitimate concern. Change usually involves heavy use of economic incentives, drastic layoffs, Downsizing, and Restructuring.

  • Theory O: Theory O change strategies are aimed at improving the Organization. Hence the O. Managers using Theory O believe if they focus exclusively on the price of their stock, they might harm their organizations. In this “Soft” approach to change, the goal is to develop Corporate Culture and human capability through individual and Organizational Learning. This theory is the process of changing, obtaining feedback, reflecting, and making further changes. Companies that follow this approach have a strong, long-held, commitment-based psychological contract with their employees.

The key differences between Theory E and Theory O are:
 

Dimension of Change Theory E Theory O Theories E and O Combined
Goals Maximize shareholder value Develop organizational capabilities Explicitly embrace the paradox between economic value and organizational capability.
Leadership Manage from the top down Encourage participation from the bottom up Set direction from the top and engage the people below
Focus Emphasize structure and systems Build up corporate culture; employees’ behavior and attitudes Focus simultaneously on the hard (structures and systems) and the soft (corporate culture)
Process Plan and establish programs Experiment and evolve Plan for spontaneity
Reward system Motivate through financial incentives Motivate through commitment – use pay as fair exchange Use incentives to reinforce change but not to drive it
Use of Consultants Consultants analyze problems and shape solutions Consultants support management in shaping their own solutions Consultants are expert resources who empower employees


Instead of using only one theory or sequencing both theories, a company should implement both Theory E and Theory O at the same time. The simultaneous use of both theories is more likely to be the source of Sustainable Competitive Advantage. The company should explicitly confront the tension between E and O goals and embrace the paradox between the two theories. This should become a balancing act between initiating actions that follow one theory and then contradict that theory.

The company should be lead by a leader at the top who clearly sets and organizes company changes. At the same time, this leader should listen and look for input from the lower levels of the company by shifting power from the company’s headquarters to where the company does business.

Special Interest Group

Join

Theory E and Theory O Special Interest Group.



Special Interest Group (167 members)

Forum

New Topic

Forum about Theory E and Theory O.


🔥 NEW Theory E in Extreme Hurts the Human Capital
In a mid-sized organization (450 employees) where I worked earlier for 7 years, the management staff are "penny pinchers (...)
4
 
1 comments
Examples of Current Theory E Companies
Who can suggest companies that still practice Theory E in today's economy? How do they do it? (...)
4
 

Start a new forum topic about Theory E and Theory O. More info.

 

Best Practices

Sign up

The top-rated topics about Theory E and Theory O. Here you will find the most valuable ideas and practical suggestions.


Expert Tips

Sign up

Advanced insights about Theory E and Theory O. Here you will find professional advices by experts.


The Relationship between Organizational Learning and Performance

Tensions and Remedies
In a paper by Sara J. Singer and Amy C. Edmondson of HBS, the complexities of the relationship between learning and perf (...)

How to Measure Intangible Assets?

Measuring Intangible Assets, Best Practices, Intangible Assets Indicators
Karl-Erik Sveiby suggests following indicators to measure intangible assets with the help of the IAM: 1. EXTERNAL STRUC (...)

Measuring the Immeasurable: Finding the Value of Intangibles

Measuring Intangible Assets, Best Practices, Intangible Assets Indicators
In his book "How to Measure Anything: Finding the Value of Intangibles in Business", Douglas W. Hubbard argues that what (...)
Information Sources

Sign up

Various sources of information regarding Theory E and Theory O. Here you will find powerpoints, videos, news, etc. to use in your own lectures and workshops.


Theory E and O Holding Hands

Combined Economic and Organizational Strategy
Picture from Beer and Nohria in which Theory O and E are joined. Note that the O really likes the 'marriage', while the (...)

Research Links

Sign up

Automatically jump to further useful sources regarding Theory E and Theory O.


News Videos Presentations Books More

News

Videos

Presentations

Books

More


Compare with: Dialectical Enquiry  |  Delphi Method  |  Systems Thinking  |  Gestalt Theory

Special Interest Group

Do you have a keen interest in Theory E and Theory O? Become our SIG Leader

 
 

Return to Management Hub: Change & Organization  |  Human Resources  |  Knowledge & Intangibles  |  Leadership  |  Strategy


More on Management  |  Return to Management Dictionary

 

This ends our Theory E and Theory O summary and forum.



About 12manage | Advertising | Link to us / Cite us | Privacy | Suggestions | Terms of Service
© 2021 12manage - The Executive Fast Track. V15.8 - Last updated: 4-8-2021. All names ™ of their owners.