What is the Abilene Paradox? Meaning.
The Abilene Paradox is a phenomenon in which the limits
of a particular situation seems to force a group of people to act in a way
that is the opposite of what they actually want. This situation can occur
when groups continue with misguided activities which no group member desires
because no member is willing to raise objections, or displease the others.
The term was coined by Jerry B. Harvey in his 1988 book "The Abilene
Paradox and other Meditations on Management". Here is the anecdote in the
book which Harvey uses to elucidate the paradox:
On a hot afternoon visiting in Coleman, Texas, the family is comfortably
playing dominoes on a porch, until the father-in-law suggests that they take
a trip to Abilene (53 miles away) for dinner. The wife says, "Sounds like
a great idea." The husband, despite having reservations because the drive
is long and hot, thinks that his preferences must be out-of-step with the
group and says, "Sounds good to me. I just hope your mother wants to go."
The mother-in-law then says, "Of course I want to go. I haven't been to Abilene
in a long time."
The drive is hot, dusty, and long. When they arrive at
the cafeteria, the food is as bad. They arrive back home four hours later,
exhausted.
One of them dishonestly says, "It was a great trip, wasn't
it." The mother-in-law says that, actually, she would rather have stayed home,
but went along since the other three were so enthusiastic. The husband says,
"I wasn't delighted to be doing what we were doing. I only went to satisfy
the rest of you." The wife says, "I just went along to keep you happy. I would
have had to be crazy to want to go out in the heat like that." The father-in-law
then says that he only suggested it because he thought the others might be
bored.
The group sits back, perplexed that they together decided
to take a trip which none of them wanted. They each would have preferred to
sit comfortably, but did not admit to it when they still had time to enjoy
the afternoon.
Six characteristics emblematic of a group failing to manage
agreement effectively
-
Members individually, but privately, agree about their current
situation.
-
Members agree, again in private, about what it would take
to deal with the situation.
-
Members fail to communicate their desires and/or beliefs
to one another, and, most importantly, sometimes even communicate the very
opposite of their wishes based on what they assume are the desires and opinions
of others. People make incorrect assumptions about consensus.
-
Based on inaccurate perceptions and assumptions, members
make a collective decision that leads to action.
-
Members experience frustration, anger, and dissatisfaction
with the organization.
-
Members are destined to repeat this unsatisfying and dysfunctional
behavior if they do not begin to understand the genesis of mismanaged agreement.
To avoid the Abilene Paradox from occurring in business meetings,
a useful technique is, when the time comes to make decisions, that somebody
should ask: 'Are we going to Abilene here?', to determine the decision is
merely a result of this kind of Groupthink,
Spiral of Silence
or Core Group Theory or is
legitimately desired by the meeting.
Forum about the Abilene Paradox. Below you can ask a question about this topic, share your experiences, report a new development, or explain something.
|
Communicating in Front of Others is Problematic
Communicating with each other in front of others may not work as well as doing it individually to find out how the other person feels about a specific topic or request. Some individuals are more likel...
 15
|
🔥
|
The Bystander Effect: Metoo at Work
Many of us have heard of instances of workplace discrimination or experienced it in person. Also, the number of "MeToo" cases, also at work, continues to grow - globally. Besides the effects on the vi...
 13
 11 comments
|
|
Original Abilene Paradox Audio Tapes
About five years ago, I was privileged to take Dr. Jerry Harvey to lunch in Alexandria, Virginia. A finer gentleman you could not find anywhere. In the course of our lunch, I asked him where I could g...
 12
|
|
Underlying Causes of the Abilene Paradox
One of the underlying causes of the Abilene Paradox is CONFORMITY, which refers to behavioral change resulting from real or imagined group pressures. Indeed, such pressures are likely to move groups o...
 5
 2 comments
|
|
|
The best, top-rated topics about the Abilene Paradox. Here you will find the most valuable ideas and practical suggestions.
|
|
Advanced insights about the Abilene Paradox. Here you will find professional advices by experts.
|
Pluralistic Ignorance and the Abilene Paradox Problems in Group Decision Making Pluralistic Ignorance can be described as a situation in which a certain person has an opinion, but believes that most o...
|
|
Mobilize the Expertise in your Team Early On Team Formation, Expert Power, Group Decision-making, Extroversion, Introversion In a short article, Bonner and Bolinger describe a surprisingly simple process to beef up the problem solving and/or dec...
|
|
Boosting Creativity in Groups Avoiding Groupthink Best Practices, Workshops, Creativity Following 13 golden rules to boost creativity in group and avoid Groupthink to happen:
1. All ideas and information hav...
|
|
Avoiding Groupthink in Brainstorming Private Brainstorming Cardstorming is a creativity tool, similar to Brainstorming, allowing people to share ideas. It can be used as an altern...
|
|
How to Avoid Groupthink? Prevention Mechanisms One method that is particularly well suited to avoid Groupthink is the Six Thinking Hats method by De Bono, because the ...
|
|
PROs and CONs of a Strong Corporate Culture Corporate Culture Change, Change Management, Organizational Change Implementing a significant change is generally easier when the corporate culture is not strong. By strong Corporate Cult...
|
|
|
Various sources of information regarding the Abilene Paradox. Here you will find powerpoints, videos, news, etc. to use in your own lectures and workshops.
|
Individual Decision Making and Group Decision Making Decision Making Process, Groupthink, Decision Making Styles, Vroom-Yetton Method Presentation about Decision Making by groups and individuals. The presentation includes the following sections:
1. Know...
|
|
Avoiding Group Biases: The Pre-Mortem Technique Group Decision Making, Avoiding Group Biases, Group Think, Tunnel Vision Nobel laureate Professor Emeritus Daniel Kahneman explains the Pre-mortum approach by Gary Klein to arrange a special me...
|
|
Social Influence: Conformity Abilene Paradox, Group Decision Making Interesting presentation about conformity and the Abilene paradox. Includes the following sections:
Presentation Overvi...
|
|
Group Influences and Opinion Leadership Groupthink, Group Dynamics, Word of Mouth Marketing, Sales, Opinion Leadership, Convincing People, Persuation Presentation about Group Influences, including various related concepts such as the Social Comparison Theory and Word-of...
|
|
Abilene Paradox and Conflicts Group Decision Making, Managing Conflicts, Managing Agreement, Avoiding Groupthink Presentation about the Abilene Paradox. The presentation clearly explains what kind of conflict is created by the Abilen...
|
|
|
Jump to further research sources regarding the Abilene Paradox.
News
|
Videos
|
Presentations
|
|
Books
|
Academic
|
More
|
|
|
|
Compare with:
Bandwagon Effect Bias
| False Consensus Bias
| Cognitive Bias
| Synectics |
Bounded Rationality
| Active Listening
| Groupthink |
Spiral of Silence
| Core Group Theory
| Team Management
Profile | Six
Thinking Hats |
Delphi Method |
Metaplan |
Contingency Theory |
Framing |
Levels of Culture
|
Changing
Organization Cultures |
Competing Values Framework
| Brainstorming |
Spiral Dynamics |
Whole Brain Model |
Analogical Strategic
Reasoning | Lateral
Thinking |
Analogical Strategic
Reasoning | Gestalt Theory
| TRIZ |
Mind Mapping |
Root Cause Analysis |
Dialectical Inquiry |
Johari Window |
Delphi Method |
Paralysis by Analysis
|
|

Do you know a lot about the Abilene Paradox? Become our SIG Leader and gain worldwide recognition as an expert.
|
|
|
|