|
The Product Life Cycle model can help to analyze maturity stages of products
and industries.
The term was used for the first time by Theodore Levitt in 1965 in an Harvard
Business Review article: "Exploit the Product Life Cycle" (Vol 43, November-December
1965, pp 81-94). Any company is constantly seeking ways to grow future cash
flows by maximizing revenue from the sale of products and services. Cash Flow
allows a company to maintain its viability, invest in new product development
and improve its workforce. All this in an effort to acquire additional market
share and become a leader in its respective industry.
A constant and sustainable cash flow (revenue) stream from product sales is
key to any long-term investment, and the best way to attain a stable revenue
stream is to have one or more Cash Cows.
Cash Cows are strong products that have achieved a large market share in mature
markets.
Also, the modern Product Life Cycle is becoming shorter and shorter. Many
products in mature industries are revitalized by product differentiation and
market segmentation. Organizations increasingly reassess product life cycle
costs and revenues, because the time available to sell a product and recover
the investment shrinks.
Although the product life cycle shrinks, the operating life of many products
is lengthening. For example, the operating life of some durable goods, such
as automobiles and appliances, has increased substantially. As a result, the
companies that produce these products must take their market life and service
life into account when they are planning. Increasingly, companies are attempting
to optimize revenue and profits over the entire life cycle. They do this through
the consideration of product warranties, spare parts, and the ability to upgrade
existing products.
It
is clear that the Product Life Cycle concept has significant impact upon business
strategy and corporate performance. The Product Life Cycle method identifies
the distinct stages affecting sales of a product. From the product's inception
until its retirement.
The stages in the Product Life Cycle
- Introduction stage. The product is introduced in the market through
a focused and intense marketing effort designed to establish a clear identity
and promote maximum awareness. Many trial or impulse purchases will occur
at this stage.
- Growth stage. Can be recognized by increasing sales and the emergence
of competitors. At the vendor's side, the Growth stage is also characterized
by sustained marketing activities. Some customers make repeat purchases.
- Maturity stage. This phase can be recognized when competitors
beginning to leave the market. Also, sales velocity is dramatically reduced,
and sales volume reaches a steady level. At this point in time, typically
loyal customers purchase the product.
- Decline stage. The lingering effects of competition, unfavorable
economic conditions, new trends, etc, often explain the decline in sales.
Several variations of the Industry Life Cycle model have been developed
to handle the development of the product, market, and/ or industry. Although
the models are similar, they differ as to the number and names of the stages.
Here is a list of some major models:
variations of the life cycle model
1973: Fox: precommercialization - introduction - growth - maturity - decline.
1974: Wasson: market development - rapid growth - competitive turbulence -
saturation/maturity - decline
1984: Anderson & Zeithaml: introduction - growth - maturity - decline
1998: Hill and Jones: embryonic - growth - shakeout - maturity - decline
|
Configuration Management Summary "CM is a process for managing complex (mostly technical) systems by establishing and maintaining consistency of a product’s performance and functional and physical attributes with its requirements, design and operational information throughout its life cycle.
CM verifies that a system performs as intended, and is identified and documented in sufficient detail to support its projected life cycle.
Use of Configuration Mangement. Applications
The CM process enables orderly management of system information and system changes for such beneficial purposes as to revise capability; improve performance, reliability, or maintainability; extend life; reduce cost; reduce risk and liability; or correct defects.
5 Configuration Management Disciplines
The CM process for both hardware and software configuration items comprises five distinct disciplines as established in the MIL–HDBK–61A and ANSI/EIA-649. These disciplines are carried out as policies and procedures for establishing baselines and performing a standard change management process.
1. CM Planning and Management: A formal document and plan to guide the CM program that includes items such as: Personnel; Responsibilities and Resources; Training requirements; Administrative meeting guidelines, including a definition of procedures and tools; baselining processes; Configuration control and Configuration status accounting; Naming conventions; Audits and Reviews; and Subcontractor/Vendor CM requirements.
2. Configuration Identification (CI): Consists of setting and maintaining baselines, which define the system or subsystem architecture, components, and any developments at any point in time. It is the basis by which changes to any part of an information system are identified, documented, and later tracked through design, development, testing, and final delivery. CI incrementally establishes and maintains the definitive current basis for Control and Status Accounting (CSA) of a system and its configuration items (CIs) throughout their lifecycle (development, production, deployment, and operational support) until disposal.
3. Configuration Control: Includes the evaluation of all change requests and change proposals, and their subsequent approval or disapproval. It is the process of controlling modifications to the system’s design, hardware, firmware, software, and documentation.
4. Configuration Status Accounting: Includes the process of recording and reporting configuration item descriptions (e.g., hardware, software, firmware, etc.) and all departures from the baseline during design and production. In case of suspected problems, the verification of baseline configuration and approved modifications can be quickly determined.
5. Configuration Verification and Audit: An independent review of hardware and software for the purpose of assessing compliance with established performance requirements, commercial and appropriate military standards, and functional, allocated, and product baselines. Configuration audits verify the system and subsystem configuration documentation complies with their functional and physical performance characteristics before acceptance into an architectural baseline.
History of Configuration Management
The CM approach evolved from initial US militairy use in the 1950s into other technical applications such as civil engineering and other industrial engineering segments such as roads, bridges, canals, dams, and buildings.
Some organizations have moved away from configuration management, because they want to avoid traceability and accountability.
By knowing what you have at all times and communicating this data organizationwide, it is easier to manage risks, quality, logistics, performance and actually plan.
Lately CM is making a strong comeback as if it were a new thing." |
|
Product Life Cycles are Not Fluent "In reality, product life curves are not so smooth nor bell curve shaped.
There are ditches, then relaunches with an improved product, then steady growth, then decline in hiccups." |
|
The Element of Time in Product Life Cycle "Has anyone researched the "time characteristics" of various markets with the intention to establish early warnings/triggers of the next product life-cycle stage? This would allow time and revenue trends to guide management decisions." |
|
Effect of Moment of Introduction on Product Life Cycle? "Is there a relationship between the introduction time in various parts of the world of a certain product (for example the iPhone which is introduced earlier in the US) and the product life cycle of the iPhone?
Is Apple trying to extend the life cycle or do they skip the first phase in Europe to get a higher profit?" |
|
Pepto Bismol's Long Life "Pepto Bismol is alive and leader of it's category despite its old age (108 years); the product is basically the same... How do you explain that?" |
|
Calculating Product Life Cycle "If we had to determine the life cycle of a product how can it be done. What quantitative variables should we take in consideration for calculating the same and why?" |
|
Real Estate Business, Life Cycle "In the present state, the life cycle of a particular product/project in real estate could have a long flat phase, before it achieves growth as well as maturity.. In such case, the curve shall have horizontal line of longer duratio in stages." |
|
Opportunity for Value Engineering in PD? "Opportunity for VE in terms of areas during the life span of a product. We all know that as product development goes in to maturity stage, the opportunity for VE is limited but still opportunity is there. Can we discuss those areas in brief...." |
|
Avoiding the Decline Stage "Understanding the phases of the product life cycle, are there ways of preventing these products from reaching the decline phase?" |
|
Revitalization from maturity / decline phase "The wave form is not carved in stone. Sometimes a product (or service) that is already in its Maturity or even Decline phase can suddenly re-emerge in a growth phase. Often this is the result of a technology breakthrough or of a crisis.
Example: TVs after the flat screens were invented. Or coal during an oil crisis.
Though some people may argue that in the case of a technology breakthrough it's not the same product anymore." |
|
Product Life Cycle versus Ansoff Model "Can the relationship of Ansoff and the Product Life Cycle model be summarised as follows?
- Product Development - Introduction Stage of PLC.
- Market Development - Growth stage of PLC.
- Market Penetration - Maturity of PLC.
- Diversification - Decline stage?" |
|
PLC at company level? "In MIT Sloan Management Review of Fall 2006, Donald Sull and Dominic Houlder of LBS stress that NOT companies, but chances are going through a life cycle. They recommend that companies manage a portfolio of business opportunities (chances) in various life cycle stages. In this way companies can anticipate future developments and prevent frequent portfolio erros, such as: No Exit, Throwing out the Baby with the Bath Water, Sticking to the Knitting, Letting a Thousand Flowers Bloom, One Size Fits All, and Generation Gap." |
|
|
|
Product Life Cycle Special Interest Group
|
|
|
|
Product Life Cycle Education & Events
|
|
|
Compare with Product Life Cycle:
Bass Diffusion Model
| Stage-Gate |
ADL Matrix |
BCG Matrix |
Relative Value of Growth
| Positioning |
GE Matrix |
Innovation Adoption
Curve | STRATPORT
| Profit Pools |
Marketing Mix |
Four Trajectories
of Industry Change |
Co-Creation |
Disruptive Innovation
Return to Management Hub: Change & Organization | Decision-making & Valuation | Finance & Investing | Marketing
| Strategy |
Supply Chain & Quality
More Management Methods, Models and Theory
|
|
|
Product Life Cycle Sponsor
|
|
|
Special Interest Group Leader
|
|
|
|
|
All you need to know about management
|
|
|
Management Smart Card
|
|
|
|
|