|
|
Competitive Advantage
|
|
The basis of performing above-average within an industry. Explanation of Competitive Advantage of Michael Porter. |
|
2 basic types of Competitive Advantage
Both can be more broadly approached or narrow, which results in the third viable competitive strategy:
Competitive Advantage type 1: Cost Leadership
Competitive Advantage type 2: Differentiation
Competitive Advantage type 3: Focus
Stuck in the middle
Overview of the Book "Competitive Strategy"
Book: Michael E.
Porter - Competitive Strategy -
Book: Michael E.
Porter - Competitive Advantage -
Competitive Advantage Forum
Competitive Advantage Special Interest Group
Competitive Advantage Education & Events
Add a link to this pageCopy and paste this code to your web page:
Compare with Competitive Advantage: Value Disciplines | Parenting Advantage | Positioning | Core Competence | Rule of Three | Strategic Types | Delta Model | BCG Matrix | Growth Phases | Distinctive Capabilities | Acquisition Integration Approaches | Diamond Model | Relative Value of Growth | Experience Curve | Twelve Principles of the Network Economy | Blue Ocean Strategy
Return to Management Hub: Marketing | Strategy | Supply Chain & Quality
|
12manage for:
|
|
|
|
|
Enter a new Tip, Idea, Comment or Question |
Enter your Reaction. |
| § Brian (USA) | Hypercompetition | "competition is good. Kill the weak, eat the slow, and may the best idea and execution win. it got us from horse and buggy to Prius. from Kitty Hawk to Airbus. The more competition, the better the products, the greater the value creation, the better the worldwide standard of living. Competition has driven white collar jobs to India, China, Brazil, mexico, Eastern Europe and Africa. those economies are now burgeoning. Fight for your share!" |
Enter your Reaction. |
| § Gary Hawkins (UK) | Mixed strategy = unprofitable | "If a firm does not dedicate itself to one of the 3 strategies by Porter, it will almost certainly suffer from poor profitability. Why? Because it will loose both the (many) customers who demand the lowest possible prices and the (fewer but very profitable) customers who are prepared to pay a premium price for the best offering in the market. Furthermore, the corporate structure, culture, reputation, marketing efforts, motivation systems, etc of firms with a mixed strategy are likely to be unfocused and ineffective." | |
| § Magnus (Sweden) | Multiple business units | "Porter mentioned that is is possible that firms create multiple seperate business units and can then realize multiple strategies." | |
| § Jane (USA) | Three-circle analysis | "As it happens I am just reading an interesting short article in the HBR (Nov 2007) from professors Urbany and Davis on competitive advantage. They developed a tool they call the "Three-circle analysis". It is an exercise being conducted by the executive team. Draw three overlapping circles. The first circle represents the consensus of the team about the CUSTOMER NEEDS. The second circle represents the team's view of how the customers perceive the COMPANY'S OFFERINGS. The third circle represents how the customers view the COMPETITOR'S OFFERINGS. Now the team can discuss all the various sections of the drawing. If the overlap between what the firm is offering and what are the customer's needs and what is not being offered by the competition is small, the firm might be stuck in the middle. Urbany and Davis found that this section is often miniscule in the eyes of the customer. Thus lots of firms are stuck in the middle." | |
| § David (New Zealand) | Stuck in the middle is not so bad | "From experience I think that practically 'stuck in the middle' is not nearly as bad in reality as it may seem from a scholarship angle. Lots of customers may opt for the 'middle quote' but there again service and attention to customer may need to be a competitive advantage." | |
| § C J Jacobs (Netherlands) | Stuck in the middle and environment | "A common theme of current strategic thinking is the relationship between an organisation’s resources and capabilities as well as the way these are positioned to interact with its environment. So essentially, this ‘fit’ between the organisation and its environment plays an important role and is relative to its success. However, both the environment and the organisation are dynamic and in order to sustain a ‘fit’ the organisation needs to adopt an iterative approach. The process of determining a ‘fit’ does not imply an averaging process, whereby organisations employ the same models and frameworks suggested by the management guru’s. ‘Sameness’ in thinking and analysis tend to produce the same conclusions and result in homogenised strategies which have a short horizon. The two issues mentioned may explain why organisations tend to end up ‘stuck in the middle’. Quote by Henderson, 1989, pp 139 – 143) “Your most dangerous competitors are those that are most like you”." |
Enter your Reaction. |
Enter your Reaction. |
Enter your Reaction. |
| § John Chamberlin (England) | Competitive Advantage Quote | "How about Ries & Trout's, 'The Law of Leadership' - 'It's better to be first than it is to be better'. (Ries, A. & Trout, J., (1994) The 22 Immutable Laws of Marketing, London, Harper Collins, p. 2)"" | |
| § Thomas Gilsfeldt (Denmark) | Quotes Competitive Advantage | "If you don't have a competitive advantage, don't compete - Jack Welch" |
Enter your Reaction. |