Dimensions of Change
(Pettigrew and Whipp)


12manage reaches 100.000 members

Content, Process and Context. Explanation of Dimensions of Change of Pettigrew and Whipp. ('91)



  

Join our management communities

Register a Free Membership


Full Name:*
Company:  
Street + nr:*
City:*
State:  
Postal Code:*
Country:*
E-mail:* (This will be your username)

I agree to the Terms of Service.

In their book 'Managing Change for Competitive Success' (1991) Andrew Pettigrew and Richard Whipp distinguish between three dimensions of strategic change.

 

What are the three Dimensions of Strategic Change? Explanation

  1. Content (objectives, purpose and goals) - WHAT
  2. Process (implementation) - HOW
  3. Context (the internal and external environment) - WHERE

Pettigrew and Whipp emphasize the continuous interplay between these change dimensions. The implementation of change is an "iterative, cumulative and reformulation-in-use process." Successful change is a result of the interaction between the content or what of change (objectives, purpose and goals); the process or how of change (implementation); and the organizational context or where of change (the internal and external environment).
 

Based on substantial empirical research, they also present five central interrelated factors, belonging to successfully managing strategic change.
 

Five change factors of Pettigrew and Whipp

  1. Environmental assessment. Continuous monitoring of both the internal and external environment [competition] of the organization through open learning systems.
  2. Human resources as assets and liabilities. Employees should know that they are seen as valuable, and they should feel that the organization trusts them.
  3. Linking strategic and operational change. Intentions are implemented through time. Bundling of operational activities is powerful and can lead to new strategic changes.
  4. Leading the change. Move the organization ahead. Creating the right climate for change. Coordinating activities. Steering. Set the agenda not only for the direction of the change, but also for the right vision and values.
  5. Overall coherence. A change strategy should be consistent (clear goals), consonant (with its environment), provide a competitive edge and be feasible.

 

Dimensions of Change Special Interest Group


Visit the Special Interest Group

Dimensions of Change Forum

Recent User Comments
Christopher Bean - UK Strategic Change "The change concept by Pettigrew and Whipp represents a traditional reflection on the problem of strategic change, the constructivist systematic approach of cause and effect. However, the reality is that change is acausal and subject to equifinality.
The what, where, when, how therefore relates to data and information, whereas the need is to grasp the ‘why,’ which delivers understanding. Information in the context provided reflects a reductionist, linear approach to contemporary strategy, exemplified still by approaches such as Taylorism & Fordism applied to strategic thinking, scenario planning and policy tests.
What seems to be required, yet is invariably ignored, is the requirement for a systemic approach which embraces ‘complexity’ (the increasing non-linearity requirements of today’s decision makers. "
   11
Jim Eckels - USA Star Model Galbraith "A related / similar organizational design concept is the Star Model by Galbraith. The star has 5 points:
1. Strategy - determines direction
2. Structure - determines the location of decision-making power
3. People - selection and development of the right people
4. Process - determines the flow of information
5. Rewards - provide motivation and incentives for desired behavior
Jay Galbraith argues that in any organizational change approach, one must take a systemic view and make sure that all 5 areas above are addressed.....when strategy is changes, the other 4 are impacted.....etc."
   17
Jim - China Not easy to achieve "Usually, in China we make strategic changes step by step. For example a human resource strategy would be implemented by the employee as a daily job. "    6
Comment on this Page

Dimensions of Change Education & Events


 

Compare with: Causal Model of Organizational Performance and Change  |  Change Management Iceberg  |  DICE Framework  |  Organic Organization  |  Force Field Analysis  |  RACI  |  Change Model Beckhard  |  Change Phases  |  Six Change Approaches  |  Core Group Theory  |  Planned Behavior  |  Business Process Reengineering  |  Kaizen  |  Office of Strategy Management

 

Return to Management Hub: Change & Organization  |  Communication & Skills  |  Human Resources  |  Knowledge & Intangibles  |  Leadership  |  Program & Project Management  |  Strategy

 

More Management Methods, Models and Theory

12manage for:


 

 

Copyright 2009 12manage - The Executive Fast Track. V10.4 - Last updated: 11/7/2009. All names tm by their owners.


  ● Jack Van Den Heerik (Belgium) Change "In principle I agree with Jim as it is well known that Change is never an isolated exercise.If you change something it always effects other things."
  ● Stefan Schnitzer (USA) The Star Model "Driving a change process can be a very unpredictable and messy process. I have found that two tools are invaluable for me in this, firstly you need a very strong vision where you want to end up, secondly I frequently revisit the Star Model to break down the challenges at hand along the 5 points to get a workable structure and to drive my own thinking."

  ● zhenzhiwang (UK) change management "i don't think so"