Forget Borrow Learn
(Govindarajan Trimble)


12manage reaches 100.000 members

Achieving organizational excellence in innovation. Explanation of Forget Borrow Learn. Govindarajan and Trimble. ('05)



  

Join our management communities

Register a Free Membership


Full Name:*
Company:  
Street + nr:*
City:*
State:  
Postal Code:*
Country:*
E-mail:* (This will be your username)

I agree to the Terms of Service.

What is the forget, borrow and learn framework? Description

Establishing major innovations within the borders of a large corporation is one of the most complex and important challenges for management. A new business (NewCo) with high growth potential rarely coexists harmoniously with established Business Units (CoreCo). Often, innovation managers face considerable head winds, when they move strategic experiments out of the incubator into execution. The Forget, Borrow and Learn challenges from Vijay Govindarajan and Chris Trimble are helpful in dealing with these headwinds. The framework was first introduced in the article "Building Breakthrough Business Within Established Organizations" in the HBR of May 2005. When the model of Govindarajan and Trimble is applied well, the emphasis in innovation can be shifted to organizational excellence. In this way the organization is becoming less dependent on excellent leadership.

 

According to Govindarajan and Trimble, NewCo must forget some of what made CoreCo successful, because NewCo and CoreCo have elemental differences. Furthermore, NewCo must borrow some assets of CoreCo. This is the biggest advantage NewCO has over independent competitors. Finally, NewCo must be prepared to learn some things from the beginning.
 

It is important to notice that the three challenges are complex.

  • They are present throughout NewCo's lifecycle.
  • They are present all at once.
  • They are related.
  • They can be at odds.
  • They need to be balanced.

Origin of the forget, borrow and learn theory. History

The HBR article by Professor Govindarajan and Professor Trimble was adapted from their forthcoming book "Ten Rules for Strategic Innovators - from Idea to Execution".

 

Usage of the forget, borrow and learn method. Applications

  • Guidance on how strategic innovation should be organized within large firms.
  • Decreasing dependence on leadership skills in innovation processes.

Principles of the Forget Borrow Learn framework. Elements

  1. How to Forget?
    • Don't be isolated (insular). Hire outsiders in key management roles for NewCo and strongly consider an outsider to head the business. Outsiders challenge institutional memory and are instrumental in building new competencies.
    • Don't assign status based on size. NewCo should report at least one level above CoreCo in order to reduce the pressures on NewCo for short-term results and to ensure that CoreCo does not hoard resources.
    • Rearrange the moving parts. NewCo should reconsider how major business functions such as marketing and product development interact. Established patterns of interaction within CoreCo are usually incompatible with the new business model.
    • Build a new dashboard. The company should not base NewCo's performance on CoreCo's metrics. Doing this reinforces CoreCo's formula for success, not NewCo's.
    • Dare to make complex judgments. The company should not judge the performance of NewCo's leader too heavily against plans.
    • Promote new thinking about success. NewCo's leader should create a unique set of beliefs about actions that will cause success. And he should regularly reinforce this set of beliefs. CoreCo's beliefs may not apply in NewCo's environment.
  2. How to Borrow?
    • Balance the yin of forgetting with the yang of borrowing. Only create links to lend NewCo a crucial competitive advantage. Avoid links where conflicts are severe. Avoid links to the IT or Human Resources departments.
    • Find common ground. Reinforce values that NewCo and CoreCo share. In most cases, CoreCo will have some values that are inconsistent with NewCo's business model. Still, the senior management team can facilitate cooperation by creating a "metaculture" composed of more general values.
    • Be careful what you ask for. To promote collaboration, reconsider individual targets. Evaluate and reward the managers of CoreCo, in part, according to their willingness to cooperate with NewCo. Avoid strong incentives tied strictly to CoreCo's short-term performance.
    • Co-opt CoreCo. To eliminate resistance from CoreCo's general manager, make borrowing as painless as possible so that he can focus strictly on CoreCo. Replenish CoreCo's resources when NewCo borrows heavily. Set transfer prices high enough to ensure that CoreCo will consider it a priority to help NewCo but not so high that NewCo cannot realistically achieve profitability. NewCo's profitability is a powerful symbol. CoreCo will always be more enthusiastic about helping when there is evidence that NewCo is succeeding.
    • Be alert to problems. Assign a senior executive to anticipate tensions between NewCo and CoreCo and to intervene should those tensions become destructive. The senior executive must be willing to spend a lot of time and energy and must be influential and respected within the corporation. She must continually explain the rationale for the differences between NewCo and CoreCo.
  3. How to Learn?
    • Don't try to mix oil with water. Hold separate meetings for evaluating the business performance of NewCo and CoreCo. These meetings must be handled very differently, and combining them can be impractical, if not destructive.
    • Protect predictions. Ensure that executives involved in NewCo's planning process understand the importance of improving predictions and are aware of how this learning process can go astray when predictions are ignored, are manipulated, or become rigid.
    • Avoid being defensive. Evaluate the leader of NewCo not on results but on his ability to learn and make good decisions. Though accountability to plans is an effective practice in mature businesses, it can be crippling in new high-potential businesses. If NewCo's leader is held accountable to the business plan, he will become defensive once targets are missed. A highly likely outcome in any strategic experiment. It will be difficult for him to be open and candid. He may even hide information, perhaps even taking the senior management team out of the learning process altogether.
    • Perform less, faster. Simplify the plans. But plan more often. Each cycle through the planning process creates an opportunity to learn, therefore more frequent planning increases the speed of learning. To make a higher frequency practical, plans must be simplified. Detailed plans (broken down by region, product line, sales channel, and so forth) are useful for mature businesses, but NewCo should focus on resolving critical unknowns, which can be accomplished at a more aggregate level.
    • Analyze through a new lens. Compare predicted and actual trends. Because strategic experiments are dynamic, the pace of changes is often more valuable information than current results.
    • You should measure what you don't know. Identify metrics that are most useful in resolving critical unknowns. These are usually nonfinancial measures and are rarely the most closely monitored metrics at CoreCo.

Strengths of the Forget, Borrow and Learn method. Benefits

  • Framework provides advice on a very difficult and important challenge within large firms.
  • Helps innovation in organizations, which will result in stimulation of the economy.
  • Provides guidance on how strategic innovation should be organized within large firms.
  • The framework decreases resistance in organizations.
  • It helps to decrease dependence on leadership skills in innovation processes. There is shortage of such skills.

Limitations of the forget, borrow and learn theory. Disadvantages

  • Even when this framework is used to its full capacity, the problem it was designed for will likely remain.
  • The framework helps to decrease, but not to end the need for strong leadership in innovation.
  • The three challenges are sometimes at odds, they are interrelated and they must be balanced.

Assumptions of the forget, borrow and learn framework. Conditions

  • Strategic experiments constitute the highest-risk, highest-return category of innovation and require a unique managerial approach.
  • A new business with high growth potential rarely coexists harmoniously with established Business Units.
  • Through improving the capabilities of the organization surrounding the innovation leader, his work can be made easier.

Book: Govindarajan, Trimble - Ten Rules for Strategic Innovators - from Idea to Execution -

 

Forget Borrow Learn Special Interest Group


Visit the Special Interest Group

Forget Borrow Learn Forum

Recent User Comments
 - South Africa H2 Achieve Strategic Innovation? Pitfalls? "Can anyone share experiences of implementing Strategic Innovation in setting a business strategy. Many companies today apply the emergent strategy model, and simply look to improve the bottom line earning over the previous year. How do you change the thinking of your management team to become more innovative in their thinking? And what are the pitfalls / dangers to Strategic Innovation?"    0
Christopher Bean - UK What is Innovation? "It might be useful to define what is meant by innovation, I like Schumpeter’s trilogy of: invention, innovation and diffusion hence tend to read articles in this context, (cognitive abstract) of innovation being the allocation of commercial resource, capital and labour, to invention which requires exploitation through the scale of diffusion to be successful. The challenge though, as always, is to understand the complexity, the nature of the system you are dealing with."    0
Henry - Canada Ways of Shaping Innovative Companies "Govindarajan's and Trimble's framework focuses on building a (seperate) breakthrough business within an established organization to achieve strategic innovations. I wonder what other ways to encourage innovation within large organizations are known?"    3
Comment on this Page

Forget Borrow Learn Education & Events


 

Compare with the Forget Borrow Learn approach: Stage-Gate  |  Business Process Reengineering  |  Kaizen  |  Change Iceberg  |  Change Model Beckhard  |  Changing Organization Cultures  |  Levels of Culture  |  Change Phases  |  Appreciative Inquiry  |  Positive Deviance  |  RACI  |  Disruptive Innovation  |  Trajectories of Industry Change  |  Blue Ocean Strategy  |  Core Competence  |  ADL Matrix

 

Return to Management Hub: Change & Organization  |  Leadership  |  Program & Project Management  |  Strategy

 

More Management Methods, Models and Theory

12manage for:


 

 

Copyright 2009 12manage - The Executive Fast Track. V10.4 - Last updated: 11/7/2009. All names tm by their owners.

  ● Jeswan Singh (Malaysia) Strategic Innovation (SI) "The terminology on SI is varied but it all means managing the human capital assets differently to yield results in a challenging business environment. Key drivers of this effort are people effectiveness and leadership styles and passion for results orientation. Often this means changing mindsets of line managers & supervisors, emphasis on leadership by example, recognition of the key drivers to institute change management as a strategy to thrive not just survive."
  ●  (Belgium) H2 Achieve Strategic Innovation "No innovative strategy before a business strategy. If the company has no strategic view on the business and the future of the company, all models can stay firmly locked up so, first think vision and purpose, then start to develop supporting strategies. This is the time to dust of the models..."
  ● Mehak Vaswani (India) Change Management Through Innovation and Creativity "Envisioning the future is neccesary. What do we want to achieve and the ways and means of achieving them is quite essential. Try implementing the learning process management. Unfreezing to inducing change and refreezing the change is essential. Innovation is associated with managing change in the best possible way."


  ● Ruud v Houten (Netherlands) Innovating Bottom-up or Top-down "Check out 2 recent articles by professor Deschamps on this question. Deschamps makes a useful distinction between promoting bottum-up innovation and steering top-down innovation to develop an innovative company.
BOTTOM-UP INNOVATION is fuelled by the ideas and initiative of individuals within a company. Companies can stimulate idea generation through hiring creative entrepreneurs and mechanisms such as: innovation performance measures, give “free time” to explore new ideas, network with idea providers, get close to the customer, and use reward systems to recognizing the providers of great ideas. Most important is to establish an innovation culture that encourages creativity and entrepreneurship. Such a culture must be customer-centric by understanding consumers intimately. Oher cultural factors are: encourage organizational creativity, appoint innovation champions, establish an entrepreneuerial culture, and a "can-do"climate and remove or reduce organizational barriers to innovation.
TOP-DOWN INNOVATION is initiated and fuelled by an innovation vision and strategy of a company’s top management. A seamless innovation process is also important (sub-processes: business and technology intelligence, idea management, technology and supply base development and deployment, product and technology strategy and planning, program management, product lifecycle management). Internal and external networking with suppliers and partners and involving them in the innovation process as well as provuiding adequate innovation resources are also important in this form."
  ● Venkatakrishnan (India) Basics of Innovation "While the points expressed by Prof. Govindarajan and Prof. Trimble are valid, it is also imperative to consider the following.
1. Innovations happen most when there is a need in a constrained situation.
2. It is abnormal to have a constrained situation all the time and every time.
3. Even in constrained situations normal solutions might work and solve the issue.
Hence innovations are more driven by: a) the need to be different, b) to stay ahead in market, c) to satisfy stakeholders continuously if not delight them, d) under constrained situations where normal solutions are not feasible, e) time or effort or environment is a constraint, f) a situation that is open to new ideas and experiment, g) a situation that accepts and takes risks.
Finally: there are no inhibitions."