|
|
Soft Systems Methodology
|
|
Applying Systems Thinking to non-systemic situations. Explanation of Soft Systems Methodology of Checkland. ('81)Contributed by: Peter Weeks |
What is the Soft Systems Methodology? DescriptionThe Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) from Peter Checkland is a qualitative technique that can be used for applying Systems Thinking to non-systemic situations. It is a way of dealing with problem situations in which there is a high social, political and human activity component. This distinguishes SSM from other methodologies which deal with HARD problems that are often more technology-oriented.
SSM applies Systems Thinking to the real world of human organizations.
But crucially without assuming that the subject of enquiry is itself a simple
system. SSM therefore is a useful way to approach complex situations and corresponding
messy questions. Origin of the Soft Systems Methodology. HistorySSM originated from the understanding that "hard" Systems Thinking, such as Operations Research techniques, is inadequate for enquiring into large, complex organizational issues. Soft Systems Methodology was developed by Peter Checkland for the express purpose of dealing with problems of this type. He had been working in the industry for a number of years and had been working with a number of hard system methodologies. He saw how these were inadequate for the purpose of dealing with extremely complex problems which had a large social component. Therefore in the 1960s he goes to the University of Lancaster in an attempt to research this area, and to deal with these soft problems. He conceives his "Soft Systems Methodology" through a number of research projects in industry and its application and refinement over a number of years. The methodology, which is pretty much how we know it today, was published in 1981. By that time Checkland was firmly entrenched in University life and he had left the industry to pursue a career as a professor and researcher in Software Engineering.
Usage of the Soft Systems Methodology. Applications
Steps in the Soft Systems Methodology. ProcessThe following steps should be taken (often several iterations are needed):
Strengths of the Soft Systems Methodology. Benefits
Limitations of the Soft Systems Methodology. Pitfalls
Assumptions of the Soft Systems Methodology. Conditions
Book: Peter Checkland
- Systems Thinking, Systems Practice -
Soft Systems Methodology Special Interest Group
Soft Systems Methodology Forum
Soft Systems Methodology Education & Events
Compare with Soft Systems Methodology: Systems Thinking | Gestalt Theory | Dialectical Inquiry | Action Research
Return to Management Hub: Change & Organization | Communication & Skills | Knowledge & Intangibles | Strategy
|
12manage for: |
|
|
|
|
| ● Vinod kumar (Australia) | What is the role of rich pictures in SSM | "The rich pictures are easy to show your thinking basically individuals perspective of the problem situation. In different countries where there are language barriers rich pictures are more helpful to communicate between stakeholders and BA ." |
Enter your Reaction |
| ● (Brazil) | SSM | "Support of Identification and Confrontation of Problems-Situations (SIESP). Revista do Serviço Público - RSP, v.59, n.01, jan/mar, 2008, ISSN: 0034/9240." |
Enter your Reaction |
| ● Charles Omeh (Nigeria) | SSM For Energy Policy | "This may be a difficult task to accomplish considering the nuclear, coal and power sectors as specified in the context of Nigeria. The issues here is that it may be difficult to get all stake holders in the industry to agree on the proposed SSM due to what could be diverse and selfish interests in the country. Hard systems if segmented to different sectors, might be a better option." |
Enter your Reaction |
| ● Janeth (Kenya) | SSM versus HSM | "I'm not getting the main difference between SSM and HSM, can you please brief me?" | |
| ● Richardson (UK) | Understanding SSM | "Lee, think of SSM as a way to label an approach you want to take to research a 'messy' subject where you cannot agree to approach the research through any hard and fast methods ie statistics, maths. SSM gives you the freedom to 'wander around' your specific subject and qualify topics as they are uncovered. Using Rich Pictures to justify/qualify your findings. It also gives the reader of your research a quick and precise understanding of your research method. All the semantics about Weltanshauungen I would discard as 'noise' by researchers poorly acquinted with the German language. Think of using what Checkland suggests as reasonable when you wish to formulate a finding from different points of views when describing a sub-topic." |
|
| ● Charlie (UK) | Response to Janeth | "My personal opininion: HSM is applicable to complex systems, but I think assumes things can be measured and therefore managed. It is based on a positivisic attitude that all may be rationalised and explained.
SSM also deals with complex systems - the most complex sytems that probably exist - human or social systems (or systems were human or social form a large part). SSM implies you do not have to rationalise or measure, but that you join with a social system in the problem domain you are trying to work in, and you learn as a group, by mutually exploring the problem domain, and reach accomodations and agreements for new things to do, that improve matters in the problem domain. The description of the SSM steps above do not capture this learning and sharing agreement aspect - it smacks to much of a hard systems approach... I really do recommend Checklands book. Hope you find this useful." |
|
| ● Chris (UK) | SSM | "I used this website and SSM in a University project last year resulting in great success. Thank you for all the information provided I found it all very useful and it helped me to get a great grade in my E-Busines project. Kind Regards Chris" |
Enter your Reaction |