History of the Balanced Scorecard
In 1992, an article by Robert Kaplan and David Norton entitled "The
Balanced Scorecard - Measures that Drive Performance" in the Harvard Business
Review caused a lot of attention for their method, and led to their business
bestseller, "The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action", published
in 1996.
The financial performance of an organization is essential for its success.
Even non-profit organizations must deal in a sensible way with funds they
receive. However, a pure financial approach for managing organizations suffers
from two drawbacks:
- It is historical. Whilst it tells us what has happened to the
organization, it may not tell us what is currently happening. Nor it is
a good indicator of future performance.
- It is too low. It is common for the current market value of an
organization to exceed the market value of its assets. Tobin's-q measures
the ratio of the value of a company's assets to its market value. The excess
value is resulting from intangible assets. This kind of value is not measured
by normal financial reporting.
The 4 perspectives of the Balanced Scorecard
The Balanced Scorecard method of Kaplan and Norton is a strategic approach,
and performance management system, that enables organizations to translate
a company's vision and strategy into implementation, working from 4 perspectives:
- Financial perspective.
- Customer perspective.
- Business process perspective.
- Learning and growth perspective.
This allows the monitoring of present performance, but the method also
tries to capture information about how well the organization is positioned
to perform in the future.
Benefits of the Balanced Scorecard
Kaplan and Norton cite the following benefits of the usage of the Balanced
Scorecard:
- Focusing the whole organization on the few key things needed to create
breakthrough performance.
- Helps to integrate various corporate programs. Such as: quality, re-engineering,
and customer service initiatives.
- Breaking down strategic measures towards lower levels, so that unit
managers, operators, and employees can see what's required at their level
to achieve excellent overall performance.
1. The Financial Perspective
Kaplan and Norton do not disregard the traditional need for financial data.
Timely and accurate funding data will always be a priority, and managers will
make sure to provide it. In fact, there is often more than sufficient handling
and processing of financial data. With the implementation of a corporate database,
it is hoped that more of the processing can be centralized and automated.
But the point is that the current emphasis on financial issues leads to an
unbalanced situation with regard to other perspectives. There is perhaps a
need to include additional financial related data, such as
risk assessment and
cost-benefit data, in this
category.
2. The customer perspective
Recent management philosophy has shown an increasing realization of the
importance of customer focus and customer satisfaction in any company. These
are called leading indicators: if customers are not satisfied, they will eventually
find other suppliers that will meet their needs. Poor performance from this
perspective is thus a leading indicator of future decline. Even though the
current financial picture may seem (still) good. In developing metrics for
satisfaction, customers should be analyzed. In terms of kinds of customers,
and of the kinds of processes for which we are providing a product or service
to those customer groups.
3. The Business Process perspective
 This
perspective refers to internal business processes. Measurements based on this
perspective will show the managers how well their business is running, and
whether its products and services conform to customer requirements. These
metrics have to be carefully designed by those that know these processes most
intimately. In addition to the strategic management processes, two
kinds of business processes may be identified:
- Mission-oriented processes. Many unique problems are encountered
in these processes.
- Support processes. The support processes are more repetitive
in nature, and hence easier to measure and to benchmark. Generic measurement
methods can be used.
4. Learning and Growth perspective
This perspective includes employee training and corporate cultural attitudes
related to both individual and corporate self-improvement. In a knowledge
worker organization, people are the main resource. In the current climate
of rapid technological change, it is becoming necessary for knowledge workers
to learn continuously. Government agencies often find themselves unable to
hire new technical workers and at the same time is showing a decline in training
of existing employees. Kaplan and Norton emphasize that 'learning' is something
more than 'training'; it also includes things like mentors and tutors within
the organization, as well as that ease of communication among workers that
allows them to readily get help on a problem when it is needed. It also includes
technological tools such as an Intranet.
The integration of these four perspectives into a one graphical appealing
picture, has made the Balanced Scorecard method very successful as a management
methodology.
Objectives, Measures, Targets, and Initiatives
For each perspective of the Balanced Scorecard four things are monitored
(scored):
- Objectives: major objectives to be achieved, for example, profitable
growth.
- Measures: the observable parameters that will be used to measure
progress toward reaching the objective. For example, the objective of profitable
growth might be measured by growth in net margin.
- Targets: the specific target values for the measures, for example,
7% annual decline in manufacturing disruptions.
- Initiatives: projects or programs to be initiated in order to
meet the objective.
Double-Loop Feedback
In traditional industrial activity, "quality control" and "zero defects"
were important words. To shield the customer from receiving poor quality products,
aggressive efforts were focused on inspection and testing at the end of the
production line. A problem with these approaches - as pointed out by Deming
- is that the true causes of defects could never be identified, and there
would always be inefficiencies because products with a defect are rejected.
Deming understood that variation is created at every step in a production
process, and the causes of variation need to be identified and repaired. If
this can be done, then there is a way to reduce the defects and improve product
quality indefinitely. To establish such a process, Deming emphasized that
all business processes should be part of a system, with feedback loops. The
feedback data should be examined by managers to determine the causes of variation,
and what are the processes with significant problems. Then they can focus
their attention on repairing that subset of processes.
The balanced scorecard method includes feedbacks around internal business
process outputs. As in
TQM. Additionally, the Balanced Scorecard provides a feedback for the
outcomes of business strategies. This creates a "double-loop feedback" process
in the balanced scorecard.
Outcome Metrics
You can't improve what you can't measure. Therefore metrics must be developed
based on the priorities of the strategic plan, which provides the key business
drivers and criteria for metrics managers most desire to watch. Processes
are then designed to collect information relevant to these metrics and reduce
it to numerical form for storage, display, and analysis. Decision makers examine
the outcomes of various measured processes and strategies and track the results
to guide the company and provide feedback.
So the value of metrics is in their ability to provide a factual basis
for defining:
- Strategic feedback to show the present status of the organization
from many perspectives for decision makers.
- Diagnostic feedback into various processes to guide improvements
on a continuous basis.
- Trends in performance over time.
- Feedback around the measurement methods themselves. Which measurements
should be tracked?
- Quantitative inputs for forecast methods and for decision support
systems.
Management by Fact
The goal of measuring is to permit managers to see their company more clearly
- from many perspectives - and hence to make wiser long-term decisions. A
1997 booklet on the Baldrige Criteria
summarizes this concept of fact-based management:
"Modern businesses depend upon measurement and analysis of performance. Measurements
must derive from the company's strategy and provide critical data and information
about key processes, outputs and results. Data and information needed for
performance measurement and improvement are of many types, including: customer,
product and service performance, operations, market, competitive comparisons,
supplier, employee-related, and cost and financial. Analysis entails using
data to determine trends, projections, and cause and effect - that might not
be evident without analysis. Data and analysis support a variety of company
purposes, such as planning, reviewing company performance, improving operations,
and comparing company performance with competitors' or with 'best practices'
benchmarks."
"A major consideration in performance improvement involves the creation and
use of performance measures or indicators. Performance measures or indicators
are measurable characteristics of products, services, processes, and operations
the company uses to track and improve performance. The measures or indicators
should be selected to best represent the factors that lead to improved customer,
operational, and financial performance. A comprehensive set of measures or
indicators tied to customer and/or company performance requirements represents
a clear basis for aligning all activities with the company's goals. Through
the analysis of data from the tracking processes, the measures or indicators
themselves may be evaluated and changed to better support such goals."
Cautionary note on using the Balanced Scorecard
You tend to get what you measure. People will work to achieve the explicit
targets which are set. For example, emphasizing traditional financial measures
may encourage short-term thinking. The
Core Group Theory by Kleiner
provides further clues on the mechanisms behind this. Kaplan and Norton recognize
this, and urge for a more balanced set of measurements. But still, people
will work to achieve their scorecard goals, and may ignore important things
which have no place on their scorecard.
Evolution of the Balanced Scorecard
In 2002, Cobbold and Lawrie developed a classification of Balanced Scorecard
designs based upon the intended method of use within an organization. They
describe how the Balanced Scorecard can be used to support three distinct
management activities, the first two being management control and
strategic control. They assert that due to differences in the performance
data requirements of these applications, planned use should influence the
type of BSC design adopted. Later that year the same authors reviewed the
evolution of the Balanced Scorecard as shown through the use of
Strategy Maps
as a strategic management tool, recognizing three distinct generations
of Balanced Scorecard design.
Book: Robert S.
Kaplan, David P. Norton - The BSC: Translating Strategy into Action -
Book: Paul R. Niven
- BSC Step-by-Step: Maximizing Performance and Maintaining Results -
Book: Paul R. Niven
- BSC Step-by-Step for Government and Nonprofit Agencies -
|
Balanced Scorecard in Banking Industry
"Anyone has done research about the relationships amongst the balanced sorecard, intellectual capital, organization commitment and organization performance in the banking industry? Thanks for your ideas." |
|
|
Cascading the Balanced Scorecard from Corporate Level to Business Levels to Individual Level
"What I have seen working is linking the organization's score card to the business unit's/divisional/departmental score cards and finally individual score cards.
In some organizations this idea fails when it is left to HR alone. The BSC is then easily perceived as a staff performance appraisal tool only.
BSC is basically a tool to help you track the implementation of your strategy but you can only do this effectively through individuals. Hence the need to cascade the BSC from corporate level to individual level." |
|
|
Make Balanced Scorecard a Regulatory Requirement
"I have the view, that the Balanced Scorecard should be enforced as a regulatory requirement for organizations.
It should be part of corporate governance requirement to regulate the strategies employed by management and the board.
It should be part of SarbOx for USA or corporate governance regulatory requirement, 'comply or explain'.
It is because now the emphasis, is on the customer satisfaction and continuous improvement of process, it has a long term profit maximization and competitiveness." |
|
|
Balanced Scorecard for Supply Chain Processes
"Does anyone have more information, experiences or lessons learned with using a Balanced Scorecard for supply chain processes in their business?
Thanks for your tips, anything is welcome..." |
|
|
What the Balanced Scorecard DOES Address and What NOT
"According to my experience, the balanced scorecard effectively deals with the 'hard side' of the organization, for example the financial performance (such as the turn over), the level of training, the quality and quantity of products.
However if fails to address the 'soft side' of an organization, such as causes of under performance, motivation of employees and organization indigenous factors e.g. internal politics." |
|
|
A New Flow Oriented Scorecard: Bellwox Bureau (Value Turbine)
"If you are interested in other scorecards, please look at my Bellwox Bureau. It is a dynamically flow oriented system, made out of 12 drawers in 4 rows – levels.
The drawers are put up with fluid flow analogies in mind, but it is strictly set up to structure the business information.
In the first level, INDIVIDUALS, we have people, systems and products, who physically contain all business information.
In the next level RELATIONS, we have the organization, communication and culture.
The BUSINESS LEVEL contains the mental picture of the business, i.e. the transactions, processes and economics.
Last level is the SITUATION where follow up, management and occurrences are to be viewed. You can use bureau as a scorecard or simply structure the business information. I would be happy if you can use my tool and try it for business assessments and give me some feedback, regards, erika." |
|
|
Linking Balanced Scorecard and Six Sigma
"Within an enterprise, can I link and combine the methodologies of Balanced Scorecard and Six Sigma?
Do they offer completely different points of view, or can they be used in a complementary way?" |
|
|
3 Types of Performance Measures
"David Parmenter in his extensive research in this area has concluded that there are three types of performance measures:
- Key Result Indicators (KRIs) that tell the board how managers have performed in terms of a critical success factor or perspective of the Balanced Scorecard.
- Performance Indicators (PIs) that tell staff and managers what to do.
- KPIs that tell staff and managers what to do in order to increase performance dramatically.
An organization should have a governance report comprising up to ten measures providing KRIs for the board plus a Balanced Scorecard comprising up to 20 measures – a mix of KPIs and PIs – for the management team." |
|
|
Balanced Scorecard in African Hospitals
"Hello. I am doing an MBA in health care management. It is challenging to find literature on balanced score card on projects done in African health care industry. Is there anyone who can assist me on this issue. Please." |
|
|
Create Strategic Aligment + Line-of-sight
"You must first assess the level of alignment in your organization. Based on this you proceed with tracking performance on the SBU level and then cascade to the individual level or performance contract level.
Having done this for more than 80 companies, the important issue is to get 100% line-of-sight or strategic alignment. This means that everybody must be able to "see" her or his contribution in terms of the strategic objectives." |
|
|
Individual Balanced Scorecard Measurement
"My organization has conducted a BSC project and now faces the problem how to proceed. There are jobs that are not divisible to individual performers. In such cases where cascading is a problem, how can we measure the performances of individual performers?" |
|
|
Balanced Scorecard in a Charity Organisation
"I have just completed a project implementing the Balanced Scorecard in a not for profit organisation. It has successfully assisted in reducing the expectation gap between the serviced users and the service provider as well as reduced the turnaround time for query between operations directorate and its internal customers." |
|
|
Balanced Scorecard for University
"I am intending to develop a balanced scorecard for a university set up, however I have no idea where to start from. Looking for like minds to discuss the same with me." |
|
|
Developing a Balanced Scorecard for Projects
"When managing projects, can a BSC add value to that? Is it possible to get more transparency in the process of projects when using a BSC? Some new research has proved that projects can be managed/controlled by a BSC. Do you agree that a BSC can be a perfect tool to control projects, and in the end, measure the success of a project?" |
|
|
The BSC is Now Being Stretched Beyond its Optimality
"I think the concept behind the Balanced scorecard is an innovative one, and if the BSC is used within the recommended structure which the developers have established, the model will perform well. But the BSC framework is quite broad and does allow some flexibility in its application outside and beyond the four recommended perspectives. It is in these areas of flexibility that the model shows lots of gaps and imprecision. The literature that is seeking to track the model's development seems to be taking the high road that is going way beyond the model's optimality, and in some instances, stretching and promising expectations that are not realistic. This can be dangerous." |
|
|
HR Use of Balance Scorecard
"How can we use the concept of balance scorecard for activities such as potential measurement, career growth etc?" |
|
|
Unit of Measurement of Balanced Scorecard in Public Sector
"The Balanced Scorecard has been proven a success in corporate companies because the unit of measure is based on financial success. However, is it more difficult to identify the unit of measure in the public sector, mainly because the unit of measurement is not always financial, depending on the various levels of government. This is my opinion based on the experience from the public sector in developing countries." |
|
|
Efficiency of Balanced Scorecard
"This gave a clear cut idea about what the Balanced Scorecard really means. But how can we evaluate or judge the efficiency of the Balanced Scorecard, management concept? How can we evaluate the efficiency of using the Balanced Scorecard concept?" |
|
|
Balanced Scorecard in Budget Formulation
"Does anyone have experience or knowledge of using the BSC in a budget formulation process? Has anyone used the BSC as a tool to support, defend or increase/decrease budgets?" |
|
|
Extended Tool of Standard Costing Variance Analysis
"BSC contains many interesting features and serves as an extended tool of standard costing variance analysis in broader perspective, encompassing financial and marketing aspects to shape the company's strategy towards growth and prosperity." |
|
|
Balanced Scorecard Design
"I designed the BSC for a few organisation and they were surprised by the statistics. One firm was appreciated and even awarded also, for that technique. It totally depends how well it is designed." |
|
|
A Balanced Scorecard with 6 Perspectives
"What is important for an enterprise willing to deploy a BSC tool, is to adapt this concept to its strategic management purpose. I am now helping a freight forwarding company to implement a BSC. Due to the specificities in this sector, I find it necessary to add two other perspectives (vendor, socio-regulatory) in the BSC applicable in this company. With these six perspectives, it seems that we can measure the company's performance globally. I'm interested in listening to your fresh ideas about the BSC, thanks." |
|
|
|
Balanced Scorecard Special Interest Group
|
|
|
|
Balanced Scorecard Education & Events
|
|
|
Compare with the Balanced Scorecard:
Strategy Maps
| Office
of Strategy Management |
Performance Prism |
CSFs and KPIs |
Hoshin Kanri - Policy
Deployment | Intangible Assets
Monitor |
People CMM
| MSP |
Beyond Budgeting
| Strategy Dynamics
| IC Rating |
TQM |
Value Profit Chain
| Scientific
Management
Return to Management Hub: Change & Organization | Communication & Skills | Decision-making & Valuation |
Finance & Investing |
Human Resources |
Knowledge & Intangibles |
Strategy
More Management Methods, Models and Theory
|
|
|
Balanced Scorecard Sponsor
|
|
|
|
Special Interest Group Leader
|
|
|
|
|
All you need to know about management
|
|
|
Management Smart Card
|
|
|
|
|
Log in
Would you like to be our