|
|
Activity Based Costing
|
|
Analyzing product and customer profitability. Explanation of Activity Based Costing. |
|
Activity Based Costing (ABC) is an alternative to the traditional way of accounting. Traditionally it is assumed that high volume customers are profitable customers. A loyal customer is also a profitable customer. And profits will follow a happy customer. Studies about customer profitability have unveiled that the above ideas are not necessarily true. ABC is a costing model that identifies the cost pools, or activity centers, in an organization. It assigns costs to products and services (cost drivers), based on the number of events or transactions that are taking place in the process of providing a product or service. As a result, Activity Based Management can support managers to see how shareholder value can be maximized and how corporate performance can be improved.
Historically, cost accounting models related indirect costs on the basis of volume.
Typical benefits of Activity-Based Costing:
With the costing now based on activities, the cost of serving a customer can be ascertained individually. Deducting the product cost and the cost to serve each customer, one can arrive at customer's profitability. This method of dealing separately with the customer costs and the product costs, enables the identification of the profitability of each customer. And Positioning the products and services accordingly.
|
| - Russia | measures | "How can the process of measurement look like?" |
|
-2 |
| Jay - Singapore | Limitations ABC monitoring operations | "What are the limitations with regard to monitoring and controlling operations?" |
|
61 |
| XY - Singapore | Limitations and Advantages of ABC | "What are the limitations and advantages of ABC in the context of preparing plans and budgets?" |
|
80 |
| Reyn - Phil | Non-value-added activities | "Why do non-value activities cause costs to increase unnecessarily?" |
|
19 |
Copy and paste this code to your web page:
More information?12manage Premium may contain the following additional information about (the) ABC : - Expert Tips and Management Papers - More info - News and Videos on this method - More info |
Compare with ABC: Enterprise Architecture | Total Cost of Ownership | Balanced Scorecard | Kaizen | Marketing Mix | Business Intelligence | Performance Management | CSFs and KPIs | Beyond Budgeting
Return to Management Hub: Decision-making & Valuation | Finance & Investing | Marketing | Supply Chain & Quality
12manage for:
|
|
|
|
Enter a new Tip, Idea, Comment or Question |
| § Enzo (Argentine) | ABC-Planning | "This depends on: 1) For one special sector it is very few probable to summarize the information.. I explain: in one sector in South America it is impossible to work with a lot of dates the one activity or reverse position more activities, few and less dates. 2) It is very interesting to applicate the ABC system when the firm has experience and the possibilities to create competitive advantages." |
|
| § jC (Singapore) | Why ABC? | "As a management tool, ABC is useful to certain organizations only. It depends on the type of management style the organization is adopting. The cost of implementation is high and the neccessity of having so much activities are questionable too. An effective and efficient ABC implementation depends highly on how it fits to the organization culture and management methods. A good ABC implementation should include only adequate activities and ignore immaterial activities - focus on systematic way of generating data from the activities - the costs vs benefits analysis must conducted." |
Enter your Reaction. |
Enter your Reaction. |
Enter your Reaction. |
| § KTK (India) | ABC limitations and benefits | "This is a very good query. When we look at ABC for the estimation of plans/budgets, the major limitation is not having a proper estimation of the costs for some critical activities such as R&D. The second limitation in using ABC for plans/budgets is a result of the first, i.e. when we miss out proper estimation of the costs for one activity that results in breakdown in the whole chain of activities. Though there are many advantages, by which we can always overcome the limitations, I would like to mention the following two: Adv 1: When we carry out planning/budgeting based on ABC we can always have more accurate estimations being done. Adv 2: We can always figure-out where our estimations went wrong, since we know what each activity contributed in our planning/budgeting. ABC is the basis for Zero Based Budgeting(ZBB) and ZBB has yielded good results in many big organizations." | |
| § Rajendra (India) | ABC Limitations | "KTK,XY the use of ABC for planning and budgeting is supposed to be for the activities that are related to the volume of the products sold. For other parts the planning and the budgeting should be based on the projects that are to be taken in that function. Like in R&D function." |
Enter your Reaction. |
| § Youri (UK) | Identifying Value in Activities | "You need to look more towards VSM if you want to identify value in activities. ABC even if it is time based is no more then creating an insight in where costs are derived." | |
| § Kooshraj (Mauritius) | Value added output of ABC | "Indeed ABC, will enable any organisatin to have a better view of all processes and procedures which enables the following: - Streamlining of processes - Identification of expensive cost drivers -" |
Enter your Reaction. |
Enter your Reaction. |
Enter your Reaction. |
Enter your Reaction. |
| § vijay (india) | activity based costing | "The product should not be discontinued. To produce that particular product (in spite of loss) could be a strategic decision. For example, you get order for say 5 products which includes the 'loss making' product. The order says you supply all or nothing. Now, if the order, taking in to account all 5 products, is profitable then it makes sense to produce and supply the 'loss making' product. Same logic can be extended to a profitable customer also. In order to retain him and earn profit on sales to him at the end of the year, you might have to sell the 'loss making' product along with other profitable products." | |
| § Jake (USA) | Loss-making products | "Agree with Vijay: there can be strategic or other valid reasons to continue the product, even if a correct ABC analysis shows it is causing losses. Of course we should investigate if there are other (more profitable) ways to manufacture the product or to keep the customer." | |
| § Simon (Australia) | Loss-making products | "Firstly one should never make the fatal mistake and discontinue unprofitable products and customers without thorough investigation. There are valid reasons, why one should continue unprofitable products some mentioned above: 1. All products, even unprofitable ones absorbe fixed costs. Even if such a product was discontinued, these fixed costs would remain within the business and depending on the fixed vs variable cost split to supply this product, overall profit could suffer. 2. It is a strategic "loss-leader" product that is sold in combination with profitable products. Once one has determined that an unprofitable product needs to be continued the following profit optimising steps should follow: 1. Assess if a price increase is possible to make the product more profitable. 2. Investigate if the product can be sold in bulk to reduce transaction costs. 3. Investigate if the product can be manufactured / sourced at lower costs." |
|
| § Kostadin Nedyalkov Krastev (Bulgaria) | Analysis | "Conversion costs are constraining the product mix. Product and customer sustaining activities can be reorganized to make a better branding. Customer repetitive actions on the profitable products,v95% of the costs for the unprofitable products must come from the unit and batch costs,vthen the goal must be minimizing the direct batch costs(making combinations with other products or buying some components), other decision maybe to make relationships with suppliers who can supply the product and making a minimum margin on the product. You all must always minimize all fixed or semi-fixed costs or I would say also constrained variable resources on the less profitable or unprofitable products and try to redistribute them to the profitable ones. You may set goals - if the trend is that for example in 70-80% or more of the orders in which the unprofitable product is bought and this product is 10-15 % or less of the order price, you have good margins." |
Enter your Reaction. |
Enter your Reaction. |