A Balanced Scorecard with 6 Perspectives

Balanced Scorecard > Forum Log in

A Balanced Scorecard with 6 Perspectives
Dawei ZHANG, Chine
What is important for an enterprise willing to deploy a BSC tool, is to adapt this concept to its strategic management purpose. I am now helping a freight forwarding company to implement a BSC. Due to the specificities in this sector, I find it necessary to add two other perspectives (vendor, socio-regulatory) in the BSC applicable in this company. With these six perspectives, it seems that we can measure the company's performance globally. I'm interested in listening to your fresh ideas about the BSC, thanks.

A 6-perspective BSC?
Richard, UK
I think what you have developed is a Performance Prism, which is basically a BSC with stakeholder measures - good luck - it should work well

A 6-perspective BSC is OK!
Midas Sekgabo, Head - Strategy and Projects, Botswana
Hi Dawei, I tried to resort to the dictionary meaning of "perspective" and find it not very helpful.
In their book, "Translating Strategy into Action - the BSC", Kaplan and Norton indicate that:
"...the four perspectives should be considered a template, not a strait jacket. No mathematical theorem exist that four perspectives are both necessary and sufficient..."
This has left us in a compromising position as we now have to individually define the proper perspectives, hence the point as raised by Richard. Test the new perspectives for causal relationship with the rest and if you have alignment - you have another day. Thought provoking though.

A 6-perspective Balanced Scorecard is OK... But
Paul Maguire, Business Consultant, United States
Dawei, my first reflection is that in implementing the Balanced Scorecard, we should develop a structure that has meaning and understanding amongst the management team. In other words, if this makes sense, go with it. Gain experience with it in the organization and then adjust it as the organization begins to make it work for them.
With that said, and not knowing the linkage between your perspectives, it seems to me that the “vendor” perspective is an aspect (theme? objective?) within the internal perspective (e.g., “innovative partnerships”, “effective channel strategy”, etc.) whereas the social-regulatory is more of a lens that the organization should consider in developing strategies and tactics against – either to take advantage or to overcome challenges that the organization finds itself in.
See the PESTEL framework as an analysis tool. Best of luck!


    Do you wish to study further? You can learn more from the summary, forum, discussions, lessons, courses, training, instructions, expert tips, best practices and education sources. Register.  

Special Interest Group Leader

You here

More on Balanced Scorecard
Best Practices

Expert Tips


About 12manage | Advertising | Link to us | Privacy | Terms of Service
Copyright 2016 12manage - The Executive Fast Track. V14.1 - Last updated: 29-10-2016. All names tm by their owners.