|
|
Transactional Leadership |
Description of Transactional Leadership. Explanation. |
|
Definition of Transactional Leadership. Description.
Transactional Leadership is the idea that effective leadership is based on a reciprocal exchange between leaders and followers. "Quid pro Quo". Conventional reward and punishment are used to gain compliance from the employees.
Transactional leadership involves giving employees something in return for their compliance and acceptance of authority, usually in the form of incentives such as pay raises or an increase in status. The theory was propounded in the 1970's by James McGregor Burns, building on earlier work of Max Weber (1947). The theory is is closely linked with its antithesis, Transformational Leadership, which involves moral, rather than tangible, rewards for compliance.
The transactional leader often uses Management by Exception, working on the principle that if something is operating to defined (and hence expected) performance then it does not need attention.
Typical Transactional Leadership behaviors
Assumptions of Transactional Leadership
Modern organizational experts or theorists would probably
not recommend this approach to leadership anymore, although it is probably
still quite prevalent. ForumCompare with: Management by Exception | Leadership Continuum | Covert Leadership | Charismatic Leadership | Seven Surprises for New CEOs (Porter) | Active Listening | Storytelling | Chain of Command | Chairman of the Board | Chief Executive Officer | Management by Exception | Span of Control | Transformational Leadership | Seven Habits (Covey) | Level 5 Leadership (Collins) | EPIC ADVISERS | Core Group Theory | Strategic Stakeholder Management | SMART | Path-Goal | Leadership Continuum | Situational Leadership | Theory X Theory Y | 4 Dimensions of Relational Work | Leadership Styles (Goleman) | Strategic Intent | Results-Based Leadership |
| Return to Management Hub: Leadership
More on Management | Return to Management Dictionary | |
|
End of description Transactional Leadership. An explanation. |
|
|
|
|