Theory E and Theory O

Knowledge Center

   

Description of Theory E and Theory O of M. Beer and N. Nohria. Explanation.

Contributed by: Jerry Watson

Contents

  1. Summary
  2. Forum
  3. Best Practices
  4. Expert Tips
  5. Resources
  6. Print
 

Definition Theory E and Theory O. Description.


Theory E and Theory O are two different approaches to deal with organizational change. According to M. Beer and N. Nohria they should be combined.

In their article "Cracking the Code of Change" (Harvard Business Review, May-June 2000: 133-141), the authors describe two theories:

  • Theory E: Theory E change strategies are aimed at realizing Economic value. Hence the E. In this “Hard” approach to change, Shareholder Value is the only legitimate concern. Change usually involves heavy use of economic incentives, drastic layoffs, Downsizing, and Restructuring.

  • Theory O: Theory O change strategies are aimed at improving the Organization. Hence the O. Managers using Theory O believe if they focus exclusively on the price of their stock, they might harm their organizations. In this “Soft” approach to change, the goal is to develop Corporate Culture and human capability through individual and Organizational Learning. This theory is the process of changing, obtaining feedback, reflecting, and making further changes. Companies that follow this approach have a strong, long-held, commitment-based psychological contract with their employees.

The key differences between Theory E and Theory O are:
 

Dimension of Change Theory E Theory O Theories E and O Combined
Goals Maximize shareholder value Develop organizational capabilities Explicitly embrace the paradox between economic value and organizational capability.
Leadership Manage from the top down Encourage participation from the bottom up Set direction from the top and engage the people below
Focus Emphasize structure and systems Build up corporate culture; employees’ behavior and attitudes Focus simultaneously on the hard (structures and systems) and the soft (corporate culture)
Process Plan and establish programs Experiment and evolve Plan for spontaneity
Reward system Motivate through financial incentives Motivate through commitment – use pay as fair exchange Use incentives to reinforce change but not to drive it
Use of Consultants Consultants analyze problems and shape solutions Consultants support management in shaping their own solutions Consultants are expert resources who empower employees


Instead of using only one theory or sequencing both theories, a company should implement both Theory E and Theory O at the same time. The simultaneous use of both theories is more likely to be the source of Sustainable Competitive Advantage. The company should explicitly confront the tension between E and O goals and embrace the paradox between the two theories. This should become a balancing act between initiating actions that follow one theory and then contradict that theory.

The company should be lead by a leader at the top who clearly sets and organizes company changes. At the same time, this leader should listen and look for input from the lower levels of the company by shifting power from the company’s headquarters to where the company does business.

Theory E and Theory O Forum
  Theory E in Extreme Hurts the Human Capital
In a mid-sized organization (450 employees) where I worked earlier for 7 years, the management staff are "penny pinchers" especially in building human capital. The staff turnover is about 40% per annum, and the organization is perennially at the bott...
     
 
  Examples / Cases of Theory E
Can you suggest companies that practice Theory E in today's economy? How they do it?...
     
 

Theory E and Theory O Special Interest Group


Special Interest Group

 

Best Practices - Theory E and Theory O Premium

Expert Tips - Theory E and Theory O Premium
 

The Relationship between Organizational Learning and Performance

In a paper by Sara J. Singer and Amy C. Edmondson of HBS, the complexities of the relationship between learning and performance are explored. Why is t...
Usage (application): Tensions and Remedies
 
 
 

How to Measure Intangible Assets?

Karl-Erik Sveiby suggests following indicators to measure intangible assets with the help of the IAM:
1. EXTERNAL ...
Usage (application): Measuring Intangible Assets, Best Practices, Intangible Assets Indicators
 
 
 

Measuring the Immeasurable: Finding the Value of Intangibles

In his book "How to Measure Anything: Finding the Value of Intangibles in Business", Douglas W. Hubbard argues that what is commonly believed to be...
Usage (application): Measuring Intangible Assets, Best Practices, Intangible Assets Indicators
 
 

Resources - Theory E and Theory O Premium

Theory E and O Holding Hands

Picture from Beer and Nohria in which Theory O and E are joined. Note that the O really likes the 'marriage', while the E is holding hands reluctantly...
Usage (application): Combined Economic and Organizational Strategy
 
 

News

Theory E And Theory O
     
 

Videos

Theory E And Theory O
     
 

Presentations

Theory E And Theory O
     
 

More

Theory E And Theory O
     

Compare with: Dialectical Enquiry  |  Delphi Method  |  Systems Thinking  |  Gestalt Theory

Special Interest Group Leader

You here


 

Return to Management Hub: Change & Organization  |  Human Resources  |  Knowledge & Intangibles  |  Leadership  |  Strategy


More on Management  |  Return to Management Dictionary  | 

 

This ends our Theory E and Theory O summary and forum.

About 12manage | Advertising | Link to us | Privacy | Terms of Service
Copyright 2016 12manage - The Executive Fast Track. V14.0 - Last updated: 25-8-2016. All names tm by their owners.